Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
B168989
|
Orozco v. Superior Court (People)
Order recommitting sexually violent predator need not be obtained prior to expiration of first term of confinement. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 25, 2004 | |
C044357
|
Canal Insurance Co. v. Tackett
Party was not entitled to recover attorney fees from interest on interpleader funds. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 25, 2004 | |
C044210
|
Greenbriar Homes Communities Inc. v. Superior Court (Couris)
Construction defect claims brought by original purchasers of homes must be determined by judicial referee pursuant to sales agreement. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 25, 2004 | |
C043040
|
Bardis v. Oates
Punitive damage award against land developer is modified because it exceeded single digit ratio to amount of compensatory damages awarded to plaintiffs. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 25, 2004 | |
S107154
|
Marriage of Goddard
Failure of trial court to introduce notice of trial as evidence was harmless error. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 25, 2004 | |
D041829
|
Carver v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Defendant that prevailed on issues that 'inextricably overlapped' Cartwright Act cannot recover attorney fees. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 25, 2004 | |
G032085
|
Bramalea California Inc. v. Reliable Interiors Inc.
Defendant is not entitled to recovery of attorney fees when it did not pay the fees out of its own pocket. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 25, 2004 | |
B165939
|
Yeung v. Soos
Although evidentiary hearing in quiet title action was not properly conducted, default judgment is valid. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 25, 2004 | |
S105909
|
Hagberg v. California Federal Bank FSB
Bank employee's statements to police regarding customer's possession of counterfeit check are absolutely privileged. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 23, 2004 | |
S105483
|
Mulder v. Pilot Air Freight
Privilege applies to communications made to local police if designed to prompt action by that entity. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 23, 2004 | |
D040393
|
Jennings v. Palomar Pomerado Health Systems Inc.
Expert's testimony that retractor left in plaintiff's abdominal cavity caused infection was conclusory. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 23, 2004 | |
B158894
|
Weinberg v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America
Because husband and wife did not have single, indivisible injury, defendant's joint and unapportioned offer to compromise was not valid. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 23, 2004 | |
E033453
|
Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Sparks Construction Inc.
Defendants subjected themselves to court's personal jurisdiction by making general appearance despite being improperly named and served. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 23, 2004 | |
C042125
|
Independent Roofing Contractors of California Unilateral Apprenticeship Committee v. California Apprenticeship Council
Authorization to expand roofing apprenticeship program that lacked notice to existing programs was invalid. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 23, 2004 | |
A101512
|
OXY Resources California LLC v. Superior Court (Calpine Natural Gas LP)
Documents contained in parties' joint defense agreement are discoverable unless they contain privileged information. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 23, 2004 | |
B165218
|
Tremper v. Quinones
Good faith improver granted relief must protect landowner from pecuniary losses incurred, including attorney fees and costs. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 23, 2004 | |
E033737
|
People v. Henderson
Dismissal isn't warranted when prosecution requests continuance within 60-day limit of Penal Code Section 859b. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 23, 2004 | |
B157527
|
Hernandez v. Department of Transportation
Court erred in granting summary judgment where conflicting evidence existed regarding design immunity for lack of guardrails at accident site. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 22, 2004 | |
B162513
|
American Airlines Inc. v. Superior Court (Di Marco)
Union representative's discussions with members are not privileged in wrongful termination case. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 22, 2004 | |
A097873
|
In re Renderos
Prosecution was not barred from applying extension to existing statute of limitations under newly enacted law. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 22, 2004 | |
S111253
|
MacDonald v. Gutierrez
Unsworn statement by arresting officer is admissible in administrative per se review hearing conducted by DMV. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 22, 2004 | |
B168117
|
Krupnick v. Duke Energy Morro Bay LLC
New statute that extended statute of limitations for personal injury actions does not apply retroactively. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 22, 2004 | |
C038678
|
Hagan Engineering Inc. v. Mills
Trial court lacked jurisdiction to enforce settlement agreement in case that had been dismissed with prejudice. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 22, 2004 | |
B159815
|
Dickens v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Co.
Malicious prosecution action alleging defendants were instrumental in bringing criminal prosecution against plaintiff is subject to anti-SLAPP statute. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 22, 2004 | |
F042967
|
Kim v. Southern Sierra Council Boy Scouts of America
Plaintiff's lawsuit seeking promotion to Eagle Scout from Boy Scouts of America failed to state valid cause of action. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 22, 2004 | |
C045847
|
K.R.L. Partnership v. Superior Court (Pemberton)
Cross-defendant cannot seek change of established venue based on improper venue claim as determined by reference to compulsory cross-complaint. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 21, 2004 | |
E031426
|
People v. American Contractors Indemnity Co.
Surety's collateral attack on summary judgment on bail bond is barred by doctrines of estoppel and disfavor of collateral attack. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 21, 2004 | |
02-16594
|
U.S. v. Alisal Water Corp.
Allegedly impaired ability to collect judgment arising from past claim does not solely support right of intervention. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 21, 2004 | |
02-57049
|
Butler v. San Diego District Attorney's Office
Court incorrectly assumed factual allegations in complaint to be true when defendant moved for summary judgment. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 21, 2004 | |
02-16543
|
Irwin v. Mascott
Debt collector is liable for violating injunction against sending misleading collection letters. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 21, 2004 |