For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Sign up for Daily Journal emails
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Johnson v. Rodriguez
Federal court improperly dismisses claim based upon erroneous conclusion that it could not review state court's judgment. 		Civil Procedure Sep. 19, 2000
Baxter v. Williams
Order 		Civil Procedure Sep. 19, 2000
Luman v. Williams
Order 		Civil Procedure Sep. 19, 2000
Kincaid v. Standridge
Order 		Civil Procedure Sep. 19, 2000
Blair v. Apfel
Order 		Civil Procedure Sep. 19, 2000
U.S. v. Garcia-Enriquez
Order 		Civil Procedure Sep. 19, 2000
Isbell v. State
Court did not err in admitting into evidence Arizona Corporation Commission order that identified unsafe railroad crossing. 		Civil Procedure Sep. 5, 2000
Association of American Medical Colleges v. United States
Medical associations' challenge to audits of Medicare billing practices is not ripe for adjudication when there has been no final agency action. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 31, 2000
Bishop Creek Lodge v. Scira
Trial court's interlocutory order denying enforcement of restrictive covenant is not appealable. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 31, 2000
Lobatz v. US. West Cellular of California Inc.
Class member has standing to challenge class counsel's fee and cost award, although award payable by defendant independently, and not from class settlement. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 31, 2000
Andrews v. Superior Court (Thomas)
Court cannot order counsel to pay both sanctions and client's share of discovery referee's fee when not authorized by statue. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 30, 2000
County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court (Axelrad)
Prior discovery rulings do not prevent disclosure of documents under California Public Records Act petition when elements of collateral estoppel not present. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 30, 2000
Metropolitan Philip v. Steiger
Trial court must abide by ecclesiastical authority's ruling on dispute between two church factions. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 30, 2000
Glue-Fold Inc. v. Slautterback Corp.
Statutory limitation period for misappropriation of trade secrets begins tolling when party is first aware or should first be aware of potential violation. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 30, 2000
Rosasco v. Commission on Judicial Performance
Retroactive application of amendments to law are impermissible without clear statement from legislature. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 30, 2000
Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.
Order denying class certification cannot stand when based upon improper judgment of case's legal merits and erroneous legal assumptions. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 30, 2000
Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.
Order denying class certification cannot stand when based upon improper judgment of case's legal merits and erroneous legal assumptions. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 30, 2000
Rothchild v. Tyco International (US) Inc.
Plaintiff's unfair competition action is not barred by pendency of another suit under False Claims Act based on same underlying factual allegations. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 30, 2000
Sonora Diamond Corp. v. Sonora Union High School District'
Failure to prove minimum contacts renders arm of California courts too short to reach Canadian corporation. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 30, 2000
Sonora Diamond Corp. v. Sonora Union High School District'
Failure to prove minimum contacts renders arm of California courts too short to reach Canadian corporation. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 30, 2000
Collection Bureau of San Jose v. Rumsey
Probate code provides one year statute of limitations period for causes of action rendering surviving spouse personally liable for debts of deceased spouse. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 30, 2000
Michelson v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.
Northridge earthquake victim not allowed to recover from insurance company because statute of limitations expires. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 29, 2000
State v. Superior Court (Clements)
Eight-person jury does not have to reach unanimous verdict to commit accused as sexually violent predator. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 29, 2000
Monterey Plaza Hotel v. Local 483
Hotel fails to establish RICO predicate against union because union did not attempt to obtain hotel property by deception during strike. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 25, 2000
Morales v. City of Los Angeles
Statute of limitations for denial of access claim begins to run when trial court enters final judgment. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 25, 2000
Rosasco v. Commission on Judicial Performance
Retroactive application of amendments to law are impermissible without clear statement from legislature. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 25, 2000
Kendrick v. City of Eureka
A state claim filed more than 30 days after dismissal by a federal court is barred by California's one-year limitations period. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 25, 2000
Ludgate Insurance Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
Trial court errs in granting plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings when complaint alleges that actual and justiciable controversy exists. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 25, 2000
Ramos v. Countrywide Home Loans
If trial court decides to enhance lodestar amount by a multiplier, it must precisely articulate why increment is appropriate. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 25, 2000
Fischer v. P.D. Inc.
Blind person who has obtained injunctive relief under ADA is prevailing party entitled to attorney-fee award. 		Civil Procedure Aug. 25, 2000
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.