Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A127287
|
Wallace v. McCubbin
Court errs in denying defendant’s anti-SLAPP motion to strike claim that was based on unlawful detainer action where acts were protected by statute. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 28, 2011 | |
D058413
|
Hartley v. Superior Court (Monex Deposit Co.)
Court errs in granting motion to compel arbitration where parties’ agreement does not clearly and unmistakably give determination of arbitrability issue to arbitrator. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 28, 2011 | |
G043665
|
Rebmann v. Rohde
Arbitrator does not need to disclose facts about his religion and family background where such facts were entirely irrelevant to case. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 28, 2011 | |
10-76
|
Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations S.A. v. Brown
State court lacks general personal jurisdiction over foreign subsidiary companies who do not have continuous and systematic business contacts in state. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 27, 2011 | |
09-1343
|
J. McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. Nicastro
State may not exercise jurisdiction over foreign company, which never engaged in activities that revealed intent to benefit from state's laws. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 27, 2011 | |
A129584
|
Latinos Unidos de Napa v. City of Napa
Calculation of 30-day period for purposes of posting notice of determination excludes first day of posting, but includes last day. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 27, 2011 | |
S182629
|
Shalant v. Girardi
Defendants may not seek dismissal of action filed by vexatious litigant who filed litigation through counsel but lost representation while action was pending. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 23, 2011 | |
10-15276
|
Momot v. Mastro
Court errs in enjoining arbitration where parties clearly entered into agreement indicating intent to have arbitrators decide threshold question of arbitrability. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 22, 2011 | |
B224841
|
Gunderson v. Wall
Court properly denies motion for interest accrued on reversed punitive damages payment where defendants engaged in misconduct in post-judgment collection proceedings. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 22, 2011 | |
A129336
|
Aronson v. Advanced Cell Technology
Court properly applies entirety of California Civil Code Section 1717 in denying attorney fees to party in action that was voluntarily dismissed. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 21, 2011 | |
B218663
|
Cowan v. Krayzman
Court properly denies motion to vacate default judgment after finding motioning party’s counsel’s declaration of fault lacked credibility. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 20, 2011 | |
09-1205
|
Smith v. Bayer Corp.
Federal court exceeds authority under 'relitigation exception' to Anti-Injunction Act by enjoining state court from considering class certification request. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 16, 2011 | |
10-15996
|
Countrywide Home Loans Inc. v. Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corp.
Court with proper jurisdiction is required to consider party’s motion under Federal Arbitration Act before exercising discretion to remand under Declaratory Judgment Act. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 15, 2011 | |
G042806
|
Investors Equity Life Holding Co. v. Schmidt
Court properly stays action on forum non conveniens grounds where defendants were all subject to personal jurisdiction in alternative forum. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 15, 2011 | |
B208839
|
Ilshin Investment Co. Ltd. v. Buena Vista Home Entertainment Inc.
Court errs in awarding attorney fees to prevailing creditor in independent creditor’s suit where statute does not authorize such award. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 14, 2011 | |
B230666
|
Davis v. Superior Court (City of Los Angeles)
Order granting summary judgment is insufficient to dismiss plaintiff’s claims affecting his right to appeal absent express declaration of parties’ ultimate rights. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 13, 2011 | |
C063624
|
People ex rel. Harris v. Native Wholesale Supply Co.
State has personal jurisdiction over defendant that purposefully derived benefit from state through substantial cigarette sales. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 9, 2011 | |
C065406
|
Kono v. Meeker
Inventory items are not items ‘actually used’ in conducting debtor’s business and, therefore, not subject to exemption from judgment collection. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 6, 2011 | |
B208839
|
Ilshin Investment Co. Ltd. v. Buena Vista Home Entertainment Inc.
Court errs in awarding attorney fees to prevailing creditor in independent creditor’s suit where statute does not authorize such award. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 3, 2011 | |
C063783
|
Collins v. Sutter Memorial Hospital
New trial is properly granted even if ground was not specified in notice, but substantively argued in papers and understood by opposing party. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 3, 2011 | |
08-56187
|
Carijano v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.
Court errs in dismissing case under forum non conveniens where evidence from both sides failed to outweigh deference owed to plaintiffs’ chosen forum. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 2, 2011 | |
G042806
|
Investors Equity Life Holding Co. v. Schmidt
Court properly stays action on forum non conveniens grounds where defendants were all subject to personal jurisdiction in alternative forum. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 1, 2011 | |
A127191
|
Dye v. Caterpillar Inc.
30-day time limit for filing amended complaint after issuance of remittitur does not apply because court was not directed to sustain demurrer with leave to amend. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 31, 2011 | |
B222175
|
Simke, Chodos, Silberfeld & Anteau v. Athans
Attorney fee award as result of discovery sanction is proper even if not stated in complaint because it is not considered as ‘damages.’ |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 27, 2011 | |
G043745
|
Puerta v. Torres
Expert witness fees award pursuant to offer to compromise is improper because offer was not valid under statute due to lack of provision for acceptance. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 27, 2011 | |
07-36009
|
Jeff D. v. Otter
In applying contempt standard, imposition of burden of proof on plaintiffs is improper where defendants had burden of proving substantial compliance with consent decrees. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 26, 2011 | |
B224142
|
Blaich v. West Hollywood Rent Stabilization Dept.
Sending administrative record by overnight courier does not constitute 'mailing' for purposes of timeliness of filing of petition for writ of mandate. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 25, 2011 | |
B221234
|
Martinez v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Offer under Code of Civil Procedure Section 998 stating that each side will bear their own costs includes attorney fees in definition of ‘costs.’ |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 24, 2011 | |
07-15386
|
Bauman v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
Exercise of personal jurisdiction over foreign corporation is reasonable where corporation performed extensive business in California through contacts of subsidiary. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 19, 2011 | |
S181781
|
Oasis West Realty LLC v. Goldman
Inference that former attorney used confidential information gleaned from representing plaintiff in former suit is sufficient to overcome anti-SLAPP motion. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 17, 2011 |