Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
07-56511
|
Avalos v. Baca
Plaintiff must show police department engaged in policy or practice of over-detaining inmates to prevail on over-detention claim. |
Civil Rights |
|
Feb. 24, 2010 | |
08-10914
|
Wilkins v. Gaddy
Excessive force claims must be decided based on nature of force, rather than extent of injury. |
Civil Rights |
|
Feb. 22, 2010 | |
08-16330
|
Mansourian v. Regents of the University of California
Plaintiffs alleging unequal provision of athletic opportunities in violation of Title IX are not required to first provide notice and opportunity to cure. |
Civil Rights |
|
Feb. 9, 2010 | |
07-55393
|
Mortimer v. Baca
No deliberate indifference exists where police department instituted numerous policy reforms to combat over-detention issues. |
Civil Rights |
|
Feb. 8, 2010 | |
09-35133
|
Waggy v. Spokane County Washington
Prosecutor is protected by absolute immunity where she sought bench warrant that instituted defendant’s prosecution. |
Civil Rights |
|
Feb. 8, 2010 | |
A123006
|
Jankey v. Lee
Americans with Disabilities Act does not preempt mandatory attorney fee provision in Section 55 of California Disabled Persons Act. |
Civil Rights |
|
Feb. 8, 2010 | |
08-15694
|
Mahach-Watkins v. Depee
Decedent's mother is entitled to attorney fees where jury awarded nominal damages in relation to claim that officer unlawfully killed son. |
Civil Rights |
|
Feb. 2, 2010 | |
06-35669
|
Farrakhan v. Gregoire
Disenfranchisement law violates Voting Rights Act based on racial discrimination in Washington's criminal justice system. |
Civil Rights |
|
Jan. 6, 2010 | |
08-801
|
Opinion of Brown
Eligible military veterans and their registered domestic partners are entitled to state-funded veterans' housing regardless of sexual orientation or gender. |
Civil Rights |
|
Jan. 5, 2010 | |
08-15549
|
Alvarado v. Cajun Operating Co.
Punitive and compensatory damages are not available for retaliation claims brought under Americans with Disabilities Act. |
Civil Rights |
|
Dec. 14, 2009 | |
G040669
|
Howe v. Bank Of America N.A.
Bank does not arbitrarily discriminate against United States citizens when it merely applies federal regulation. |
Civil Rights |
|
Dec. 10, 2009 | |
08-15732
|
Ewing v. City of Stockton
Affidavit supporting warrant application with eyewitness statements and reliable suspect identification is sufficient for probable cause finding despite deceptive representations. |
Civil Rights |
|
Dec. 10, 2009 | |
08-17070
|
Becerril v. Pima County Assessor's Office
Plaintiff with limited ability to speak for long periods while under stress fails to allege disability under Americans with Disabilities Act. |
Civil Rights |
|
Nov. 26, 2009 | |
07-56313
|
Barker v. Riverside County Office of Education
Teacher retaliated against after advocating for disabled students has standing to sue under Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and Americans with Disabilities Act. |
Civil Rights |
|
Oct. 25, 2009 | |
07-56521
|
Lone Star Security & Video Inc. v. City of Los Angeles
City's enforcement of ordinance that is preempted by state law does not violate due process where adequate notice of enforcement was given. |
Civil Rights |
|
Oct. 21, 2009 | |
06-55837
|
McSherry v. City of Long Beach
Exonerated prisoner's civil rights claim fails where officers had probable cause to make arrest based on victim's unexpected selection of photo. |
Civil Rights |
|
Oct. 20, 2009 | |
07-16715
|
The Committee Concerning Community Improvement v. City of Modesto
Fair Housing Act applies to claim by homeowners that law-enforcement took longer to respond to emergencies in Latino neighborhoods. |
Civil Rights |
|
Oct. 9, 2009 | |
08-35278
|
Indergard v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.
Physical capacity examination constitutes 'medical examination' where occupational therapist determined that employee could not lift weight required for position. |
Civil Rights |
|
Sep. 29, 2009 | |
E046248
|
Reycraft v. Lee
Disabled person has no standing for damages when she did not present herself to business or pay standard fee for pool access. |
Civil Rights |
|
Sep. 24, 2009 | |
G041177
|
Carolyn v. Orange Park Community Association
Recreational trail provided to members of residential development does not constitute ‘public accommodation’ subject to Americans with Disabilities Act. |
Civil Rights |
|
Sep. 23, 2009 | |
08-35396
|
Sharer v. State of Oregon
Agency within judicial branch does not constitute program receiving federal assistance for purposes of disability discrimination claim. |
Civil Rights |
|
Sep. 22, 2009 | |
B210868
|
Bearman v. California Medical Board
Agency officials entitled to qualified immunity where law regarding use of medical marijuana for attention deficit disorder is not clearly established. |
Civil Rights |
|
Aug. 28, 2009 | |
07-15661
|
George v. Bay Area Rapid Transit
Transit service is not liable under Americans with Disabilities Act where facilities complied with regulations to aid visually impaired persons. |
Civil Rights |
|
Aug. 14, 2009 | |
06-55584
|
Sanchez v. Canales
Officers entitled to qualified immunity where occupants of home were detained during probation compliance search. |
Civil Rights |
|
Jul. 31, 2009 | |
07-56773
|
Desrochers v. City of San Bernardino
Sergeants' complaints about supervisor is not matter of 'public concern' warranting constitutional protection. |
Civil Rights |
|
Jul. 14, 2009 | |
07-36039
|
Stormans Inc. v. Selecky
District court incorrectly applies strict scrutiny to state law requiring all pharmacies to dispense lawfully available drugs. |
Civil Rights |
|
Jul. 9, 2009 | |
07-1428
|
Ricci v. DeStefano
Racial discrimination found where city discards test results based on claim that adoption of exams with racial disparities created possibility of liability. |
Civil Rights |
|
Jun. 30, 2009 | |
07-16326
|
Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.) Inc.
Disabled person has no standing to challenge unencountered barriers where barriers did not deter him from returning to store. |
Civil Rights |
|
Jun. 30, 2009 | |
S168047
|
Strauss v. Horton
Proposition 8 is valid amendment to California Constitution where application excludes same-sex couples from using designation of 'marriage.' |
Civil Rights |
|
Jun. 19, 2009 | |
06-35730
|
Noel v. Hall
Plaintiff has no standing to allege federal wiretap claims based on his own illegal interception of private phone conversations. |
Civil Rights |
|
Jun. 15, 2009 |