Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
97-6004 and 97-6102
|
Okland Oil Co. v. Conoco Inc.
Award of both pre-judgment interest and punitive damages isn't impermissible double penalty. |
Contracts |
|
May 19, 1998 | |
97-3066
|
Rhodes v. Amoco Oil Co.
Franchiser's property sale offer to franchisee must approach fair market value to be bona fide offer. |
Contracts |
|
May 13, 1998 | |
97-5024
|
Universal Showcase Inc. v. Oklahoma Fixture Co.
Order |
Contracts |
|
Apr. 24, 1998 | |
97-6358
|
Group Management Services v. Bumps & Associates
Order |
Contracts |
|
Apr. 20, 1998 | |
96-3247
|
Wayman v. McKown
Order |
Contracts |
|
Apr. 20, 1998 | |
97-5170
|
Noram Gas Transmission Co. v. Enterprise Resource Corporation
Order |
Contracts |
|
Apr. 15, 1998 | |
96-8119
|
Brown v. Royal Maccabees Life Ins.
Non-policy promotional materials are not part of an insurance policy. |
Contracts |
|
Mar. 23, 1998 | |
96SC483
|
Fox v. I-10, Ltd.
Limited partnership agreements may provide for amendment of capital contribution requirement by majority vote. |
Contracts |
|
Mar. 23, 1998 | |
97SC199
|
Water Waste & Land Inc. v. Lanham
Opinion |
Contracts |
|
Mar. 11, 1998 | |
96-4133
|
Sine Enterprises Inc. v. Jaguar Credit Corp.
Order |
Contracts |
|
Mar. 6, 1998 | |
97-3009
|
Midwest Grain Products, Inc. v. Envirofuels Marketing Inc.
Order |
Contracts |
|
Mar. 3, 1998 | |
96-6235
|
Rich v. Med-National Inc.
Order |
Contracts |
|
Feb. 5, 1998 | |
97sa65
|
Phoenix Power Partners v. The Colorado Public Utilities Commission
Changes made to contract accomplished a novation, resulting in a new contract which must comply with bidding procedures. |
Contracts |
|
Feb. 2, 1998 | |
96-1436
|
Torrez v. BEI Graphics Corporation
Order |
Contracts |
|
Jan. 30, 1998 | |
96-1399
|
Protectors Insurance v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Damage instruction is erroneous where it permits plaintiff to obtain a double recover for breach. |
Contracts |
|
Jan. 16, 1998 | |
97-0086
|
Consumers International, Inc. v. Sysco Corp.
Enforcement of termination-at-will clause need not be for 'good cause.' |
Contracts |
|
Jan. 7, 1997 |