Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A155955
|
In re Friend
Certificate of appealability as to claims in defendant's second habeas petition, pursuant to Proposition 66, was denied because defendant failed to allege specific facts that showed ineffective assistance. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
C. Fujisaki | Mar. 23, 2022 |
B309273
|
People v. Edwards
Requirement for witnesses to wear masks while testifying did not violate the confrontation clause. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Wiley | Mar. 22, 2022 |
E072463
|
Modification: People v. E.H.
Changes to the gang-enhancement statute merited reversal of conviction because it was not conclusive that the jury instructions were harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Slough | Mar. 22, 2022 |
E076045
|
In re Harper
Jury's robbery-murder special circumstance finding was upheld because substantial evidence showed defendant was a major participant in the robbery despite defendant's youth at the time of the crime. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
A. McKinster | Mar. 21, 2022 |
E073965
|
Modification: People v. Clements
Although admitting a factual summary from a prior appellate decision was improper, the trial court's ruling was upheld because defendant failed to identify any portions of the appellate opinion the trial court relied on. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Slough | Mar. 18, 2022 |
20-71709
|
Munoz Gonzalez v. U.S.
Courts must utilize an objective pragmatic approach to determine whether an argument was "previously unavailable" to a prisoner seeking to file a second habeas request under 28 U.S.C. Section 2255. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. Forrest | Mar. 18, 2022 |
F080831
|
Gann v. Acosta
Because the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations is conferred broad quasi-legislative authority for prison administrative purposes, denial of inmate's spousal overnight visit was within its authority. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Snauffer | Mar. 17, 2022 |
B311548
|
People v. Guerrero
Courts must consider youth-related mitigating factors enumerated in Penal Code Section 190.3 to adequately exercise sentencing discretion. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. Perluss | Mar. 16, 2022 |
B311611
|
People v. Magana
Defendant had a colorable equal protection challenge where involuntary commitments for sexually violent predators lacked the jury right advisements required for other involuntary commitments. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
G. Feuer | Mar. 16, 2022 |
B313533
|
In re Brown
Courts must apply *Humphrey* framework for bail determinations even where defendants are charged with serious, violent felonies and it does not require unusual circumstances to merit its use. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. Perluss | Mar. 16, 2022 |
B317228
|
People v. Lopez
The trial court had discretion to impose concurrent, rather than consecutive, sentences on defendant's specified felony sex crime convictions. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Segal | Mar. 16, 2022 |
D078191
|
People v. Harden
A Penal Code Section 1170.95 petition to vacate a felony murder conviction must be denied if legal determinations from a prior appellate opinion refute defendant's petition as a matter of law |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. McKinney | Mar. 15, 2022 |
A163715
|
Tan v. Superior Court (People)
Vehicle Code Section 23640's prohibition on misdemeanor diversion for DUIs supersedes Penal Code Section 1001.95's allowance for diversion of non-enumerated misdemeanors |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
S. Margulies | Mar. 14, 2022 |
B307726
|
People v. Diaz
Defendant could not vacate his plea agreement since he could not prove that he did not understand the plea's immigration consequences and would have rejected it had he understood. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
C. Moor | Mar. 11, 2022 |
G059322
|
People v. Breceda
A trial court did not violate defendant's right to a fair trial by denying his motion for a mistrial based on a 73-day delay after the close of the prosecution's case-in-chief caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
K. O'Leary | Mar. 11, 2022 |
S107900
|
Modification: People v. Wright
Denial of defendant's motion to represent himself at trial for being untimely was not an abuse of discretion when the motion was made two days before trial and appeared to be an attempt at an unjustifiable delay. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
T. Cantil-Sakauye | Mar. 11, 2022 |
G059940
|
People v. Pacheco
Denial of defendant's petition to vacate his murder conviction was reversed because the jury instruction did not require jurors to find that defendant directly aided and abetted the target crime of murder. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
E. Moore | Mar. 10, 2022 |
20-5279
|
Wooden v. U.S.
Determining whether felonies are part of the same occasion under the Armed Career Criminal Act's requires a multi-factored inquiry that includes timing, location, and the character and relationship of the offenses. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
E. Kagan | Mar. 8, 2022 |
E075758
|
People v. Pixley
Where defendant entered into a plea bargain with a stipulated sentence, he was not eligible for resentencing based on military-service-related post-traumatic stress disorder. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Ramirez | Mar. 8, 2022 |
E073987
|
People v. Gonzalez
A statute criminalizing possession of a loaded, operable firearm while also in possession of controlled substances did not violate the Second Amendment right to bear arms. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Slough | Mar. 7, 2022 |
A163992
|
Hernandez-Valenzuela v. Superior Court (People)
Court delays because of case backlogs due to COVID-19 pandemic was an extraordinary and exceptional circumstance that warranted speedy trial rights exceptions. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
I. Petrou | Mar. 7, 2022 |
19-17038
|
Flemming v. Matteson
Defendant's federal claims were untimely under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act's one-year statute of limitations because his state habeas petitions were untimely. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
L. VanDyke | Mar. 7, 2022 |
F078864
|
People v. Rodriguez
Increased evidentiary requirements to prove gang-related crimes and enhancements must be applied retroactively and requires proof that the benefit to the street gang is more than just reputational. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Snauffer | Mar. 3, 2022 |
A159026
|
People v. Faial
Assembly Bill 1950, which generally limits probation terms to two years, does not apply retroactively when the trial court's revocation and termination of defendant's probation occurred before the bill's effective date. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
C. Fujisaki | Mar. 2, 2022 |
A163307
|
Kuhnel v. Superior Court (People)
When defendant was validly on probation when her probation was revoked and the probation violation hearing never occurred, Assembly Bill 1950 does not apply and the probation period is tolled until the formal probation hearing occurs. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
A. Tucher | Mar. 2, 2022 |
E072463
|
Modification: People v. E. H.
Changes to the gang-enhancement statute merited reversal of conviction because it was not conclusive that the jury instructions were harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Slough | Mar. 2, 2022 |
A156387
|
People v. Phillips
Evidence of defendant's prior involvement in a similar crime may be used to negate claims of innocence especially where circumstances were factually analogous. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
T. Stewart | Mar. 1, 2022 |
20-15396
|
Hoffman v. Preston
The court extended the Bivens remedy to allow suit against a guard who allegedly created a substantial risk of harm to plaintiff prisoner. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
L. Rosenthal | Mar. 1, 2022 |
F078228
|
Modification: People v. Vasquez
A gang enhancement did not require a showing that an umbrella gang and local subset were connected, because the umbrella gang alone satisfied the requirements. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
C. Poochigian | Feb. 28, 2022 |
A164257
|
People v. Flores
The probative value of defendant's prior acts evidence concerning his propensity to commit domestic violence outweighed any danger of undue prejudice. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
V. Rodriguez | Feb. 28, 2022 |