| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
00-56521
|
Majoy v. Roe
Conviction where key witness admits to lying about defendant's involvement in crime may override defendants untimely petition for federal habeas review. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
01-10179
|
U.S. v. Lee
Defendant who unlawfully copied computer Website did not deserve sentence enhancement for possessing special computer skills. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
01-1007
|
Johnson v. Atherton
Petition for writ of habeas corpus is properly denied when ineffective assistance of counsel claim does not implicate voluntariness of plea. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
99-50760
|
U.S. v. Jimenez-Dominguez
District court did not commit plain error by failing to inquire whether guilty plea was result of discussions with prosecutor. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
01-30065
|
U.S. v. Huggins
Because government conducted thermal imaging search in good faith reliance on facially valid warrant, Fourth Amendment does not compel suppression of images. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
99-10170
|
U.S. v. Valensia
Despite multiple errors by government and court, defendant's sentence is affirmed based on overwhelming and uncontroverted evidence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
01-50081
|
U.S. v. Geston
Conviction is reversed because prosecutor improperly asked witness to comment on truthfulness of other witnesses. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
01-3185
|
Sternberg v. Secretary, Dept. of Health and Human Services
Sentencing agreement does not obligate government to exclude defendant's participation in Medicare program for period no longer than his incarceration. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
01-50263
|
U.S. v. Diaz-Suarez
Based on totality of circumstances, investigatory stop was warranted by reasonable suspicion defendant was involved in criminal activity. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
01-50468
|
U.S. v. Marcucci
Grand jury charge that does not directly state the jury may refuse to indict if probable cause exists is constitutional. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
00-10643
|
U.S. v. Adamson
District court violated defendant's constitutional right of confrontation by prohibiting him from attacking his brother's credibility. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
00-56697
|
Pagtalunan v. Galaza
District court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing habeas petition for failure to prosecute and comply with court order. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
00-6204
|
Hawkins v. Mullin
Court's interpretation that first-degree felony murder statute included kidnapping for extortion as underlying felony is foreseeable. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
01-7097
|
U.S. v. Sparks
Probable cause existed for search warrant for defendant's home because defendant's arrest was valid and residence was located near scene of crime. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
01-1261
|
U.S. v. Jose-Gonzalez
Court reasonably departed upward from guidelines to account for multiple deaths and injuries resulting from defendant's conduct of transporting unlawful aliens. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
01-6071
|
Willingham v. Mullin
Denial of habeas petition is proper where manslaughter instruction was given without second-degree murder instruction. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 9, 2002 | |
|
01-3211
|
U.S. v. Mendez-Zamora
Expert testimony regarding roles in drug conspiracies did not attempt to take ultimate issue of guilt away from jury. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 9, 2002 | |
|
01-1299
|
Saiz v. Burnett
Federal court failed to analyze state court's decision to exclude testimony for objective reasonableness. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 9, 2002 | |
|
01-5221
|
U.S. v. Erwin
Prohibition of commercial fishing is improper condition for supervised release for felon in possession of ammunition. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 9, 2002 | |
|
01-50288
|
U.S. v. Beckman
Improper cross-examination of defendant regarding prior arrest and conviction constituted harmless error. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 8, 2002 | |
|
S018815
|
People v. Gurule
Substantial evidence supports that defendant was given 'Miranda' warnings despite lack of recording. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 8, 2002 | |
|
C025971
|
People v. Wright
Ambiguous assault instruction is harmless error where defendant admitted to reckless driving and intent to scare victims. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 8, 2002 | |
|
S092179
|
People v. Wutzke
Quasi-familial relationship does not make convicted child molester a 'relative' for sentencing purposes. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 8, 2002 | |
|
S089120
|
People v. Acosta
Sentence may be based on Three Strikes Law and enhancements under Penal Code Section 667(a) notwithstanding defendant's eligibility under One Strike Law. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 8, 2002 | |
|
S018634
|
People v. Gutierrez
Convictions and death sentence for first-degree murder and other offenses are upheld. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 8, 2002 | |
|
01-55841
|
Luna v. Cambra
Trial counsel's failure to interview and subpoena two alibi witnesses and one exonerating witness is prejudicial error. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 8, 2002 | |
|
01-50615
|
U.S. v. Chavez-Miranda
Forcible entry by police after waiting 20 to 30 seconds, did not violate the 'Knock and Announce Rule.' |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 8, 2002 | |
|
00-57051
|
Packer v. Hill
Trial judge violated defendant's due process rights by coercing jury to render guilty verdict. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 7, 2002 | |
|
S097765
|
People v. Garcia
Shooter's conviction is not required to impose sentencing enhancement on accomplice for gun use allegation where crime is for benefit of street gang. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 7, 2002 | |
|
S017657
|
In re Andrews
Counsel's decision not to further investigate mitigating evidence over defendant's objection is reasonable under Sixth Amendment. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 7, 2002 |
