For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
People v. Kaiser
Record doesn't support trial court's finding that defendant's waiver of 'Miranda' rights wasn't knowing and intelligent. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 16, 2001
People v. Martinez
Supreme Court refuses to review determinations on questions of fact by member of death penalty sentencing panel. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 15, 2001
People v. Scott
Claims that court erred in denying motion for self-representation and improperly imposed sentence for firearm-use enhancement are without merit. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 15, 2001
People v. Andreotti
Trial court did not have authority to approve deferred entry of judgment absent motion by district attorney calling for such action. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 15, 2001
People v. Fannin
Bicycle chain qualifies as 'slungshot' in violation of Dangerous Weapons Control Law. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 15, 2001
People v. Morgan
Defense counsel has duty to determine whether prior out-of state convictions are strikes under California law before plea bargain. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 15, 2001
People v. Gomez
Defendant's conviction is reversed due to prosecution's discriminatory use of peremptory challenge to exclude Hispanics from jury. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 15, 2001
People v. Stevens
Trial court errs in directing defendant to report to specific parole office in another county upon his release from prison. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 15, 2001
State v. Smith
No confrontation clause violation when state did not provide closed-circuit television for 'unavailable' child witness. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 15, 2001
State v. Breazeale
Among other things, court has statutory authority to vacate conviction records dismissed pursuant to RCW 9.95.240. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 15, 2001
State v. Ward
To establish felony violation of no-contact order, state doesn't have to prove that predicate assault wasn't first or second-degree assault. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 15, 2001
State v. Silva
Conviction reversed because pro se defendant wasn't informed of maximum possible sentence and therefore didn't validly waive right to counsel. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 14, 2001
State v. O'Cain
Police dispatch regarding stolen car must be shown to be reliable to justify search. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 14, 2001
Everett v. Abbey
Collateral estoppel is improper where defendant did not have opportunity to litigate issues of breach and duty in prior criminal proceeding. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 14, 2001
In re Williams M.
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 11, 2001
In re William
Amended statute requiring defendant to continue to register as a sex offender after rehabilitation doesn't violate ex post facto clause. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 11, 2001
U.S. v. Holloway
All elements of robbery offense must be established in order to sustain conviction. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 9, 2001
U.S. v. Trinidad-Aquino
Court properly declines to enhance defendant's sentence when previous state law conviction is not aggravated felony as defined by federal statute. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 9, 2001
Canon v. Gibson
Death penalty affirmed for man who was involved in murder of 84-year old woman. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 9, 2001
U.S. v. Buckland
Plain error found for sentence imposed in accordance with statute found by Supreme Court to be 'facially unconstitutional.' 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 9, 2001
People v. Leon
Testimony by defendant's interpreter regarding defendant's act of touching his crotch while his young victim testified was unduly prejudicial. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 9, 2001
People v. American Contractors Indemnity Co.
Exoneration of bail bond is proper where clerk fails to comply with statutorily imposed notice provisions. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 9, 2001
People v. Williams
Mental state for assault requires knowledge that defendant's act by its nature will probably and directly result in injuring another. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 9, 2001
People v. Cervantes
Evidence of proximate cause was insufficient to support gang member's conviction for provocative act murder. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 9, 2001
U.S. v. Luppi
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 8, 2001
People v. Weaver
Death sentence is affirmed against defendant who murdered two people and committed rape because voices told him to commit crimes. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 8, 2001
U.S. v. Bailey
Court retains jurisdiction over individual in violation of supervised release when hearing held within reasonable time after relapse term has expired. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 8, 2001
U.S. v. Monroe
Court didn't err in applying criminal sexual abuse guideline in case where minor was abducted. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 8, 2001
State v. Sepulveda
'Apprendi' does not apply retroactively to post-conviction proceedings in cases that have become final. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 8, 2001
State v. Sierra-Cervantes
Although self-defense jury instruction was incorrect, it did not confuse or mislead jury and caused no fundamental error requiring reversal. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 8, 2001
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.