| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
98-35026
|
Pawlyk v. Wood
Defendant who raises insanity defense may expect compelled disclosure of psychiatric examinations. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 17, 2001 | |
|
D033527
|
People v. Englebrecht
Injunction against street gang member does not violate constitutional rights. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 17, 2001 | |
|
00-50107
|
U.S. v. Velasco-Heredia
In defendant's conspiracy to distribute marijuana case, drug quantity is fact government must prove beyond reasonable doubt. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 17, 2001 | |
|
00-15074
|
Fenner v. U.S. Parole Commission
Parolee is subject to term of special parole because order modifying sentence only referred to term of imprisonment. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 17, 2001 | |
|
00-5023
|
U.S. v. Korman
Government had discretion not to request sentence reduction despite defendant's assistance in investigation of others. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 17, 2001 | |
|
99-4088
|
United States v. Haber
Conviction and sentence for mail fraud affirmed where defendant could not show trial errors or where error was harmless. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 17, 2001 | |
|
00-50186
|
U.S. v. Kentz
Defendant who committed offense while awaiting trial may receive sentence enhancement despite not being warned by judge. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 17, 2001 | |
|
00-30149
|
U.S. v. Caperna
District court cannot depart from sentencing guidelines because of sentence disparity between co-defendants unless co-defendants were convicted of same crime. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 17, 2001 | |
|
00-10416
|
U.S. v. Carbullido
Federal statute only permits either commitment or unconditional release, not conditional release. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 17, 2001 | |
|
45798-5-I
|
State v. Westling
Multiple counts of second degree arson may result from one fire if malice is proved against each of the victims. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 16, 2001 | |
|
00-6251
|
Moore v. Gibson
Oklahoma does not recognize prisoner mailbox rule, and late filing of state habeas petition failed to toll limitations period for federal petition. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 16, 2001 | |
|
B139382
|
People v. Ly
Code section prohibiting presentence custody credits doesn't apply to murder that occurred prior to section's operative date. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 16, 2001 | |
|
01-0089
|
State v. Powers
Hit and run accident scene with two victims may only be counted as one accident scene. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 16, 2001 | |
|
46089-7-I
|
State v. Deman
Defendant's prior drunk driving convictions are not 'washed out' for the purpose of sentencing enhancement. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 15, 2001 | |
|
70003-6
|
State v. Cienfuegos
Defense attorney's failure to request jury instruction regarding diminished capacity was not prejudicial. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 15, 2001 | |
|
19111-7-III
|
State v. Glas
Voyeurism statute that doesn't define term 'hostile intrusion' is neither vague nor overbroad when term is given ordinary meaning. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 15, 2001 | |
|
19168-1-III
|
State v. Rainey
Defendant who was convicted after her attorney refused to allow her to testify at trial may have received ineffective assistance of counsel. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 15, 2001 | |
|
44935-4-I
|
State v. Ross
Police officer did not violate statute by transferring defendant to other jurisdiction rather than taking him to nearest jail to set bail. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 15, 2001 | |
|
67342-0
|
State v. Elledge
When defendant's waiver of direct right to appeal conviction and sentence was made knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently, death sentence affirmed. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 15, 2001 | |
|
B143513
|
People v. Valdez
Sufficient evidence supports trial court's finding that defendant qualified for mentally disordered offender status. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 12, 2001 | |
|
G025414
|
People v. Tillett
Court's instruction to jury defining personal use of firearm during robbery is error, therefore personal discharge of gun enhancement must be stricken. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 12, 2001 | |
|
E026720
|
People v. Stewart
Defendant may not challenge prison sentence that allegedly violated plea bargain without certificate of probable cause. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 12, 2001 | |
|
E029271
|
People v. Tafoya
Jury properly finds defendant guilty of obstructing telephone line or apparatus connected therewith based on removal of battery from cordless phone. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 12, 2001 | |
|
B147822
|
Collins v. Superior Court (People)
Defendant who lies at deposition does not commit perjury unless the document is delivered. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 12, 2001 | |
|
B141709
|
People v. Salas
Personal-use-of-firearm sentence enhancement cannot be applied unless it is determined that defendant actually used firearm in commission of offense. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 12, 2001 | |
|
H020689
|
People v. Coelho
If court cannot determine beyond reasonable doubt facts jury relied on, it should assume facts that allow discretion to impose concurrent term. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 12, 2001 | |
|
00CA1211
|
People v. Chavez
Resentencing of defendant which included period of parole did not violate his double jeopardy rights. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 11, 2001 | |
|
00-5012
|
U.S. v. Iiland
Government did not offer sufficient evidence to sustain conviction for possession of firearm in furtherance of drug trafficking. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 11, 2001 | |
|
00-3101
|
Simpson v. Bouker
Penalty and criminal conviction for failure to pay tax on large amounts of marijuana do not violate Double Jeopardy Clause. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 10, 2001 | |
|
00SC481
|
Navarro v. People
Trial court erred in admitting hearsay statements under co-conspirator exception where there is no evidence that defendant conspired with drug dealer. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 10, 2001 |
