This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
U.S. v. Sedillo
Order
Criminal Law and Procedure May 3, 2001
Chavez v. State of Oklahoma
Order
Criminal Law and Procedure May 3, 2001
Lyons v. New Mexico Dept. of Corrections
Order
Criminal Law and Procedure May 3, 2001
U.S. v. Patron
Order
Criminal Law and Procedure May 3, 2001
Mathers v. State
Sexually violent predator may not combine total commitment with community-based treatment.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 3, 2001
State v. Jenkins
Statute setting forth registration requirements for sexually violent predators is unconstitutionally vague.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 3, 2001
State v. Jacobs
Domestic violence offender has no standing to challenge warrantless search of victim's residence.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 3, 2001
Washington v. Van Buren
State breaches plea agreement when it makes remarks to court justifying imposition of exceptional sentence.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 3, 2001
State v. Hampton
Defendant, who files false inspection form for sewage disposal system with health department, may be convicted for filing false document with public agency.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 3, 2001
Washington v. King
Speedy trial period commences when information is filed, where long and unnecessary delay occurs in bringing defendant who is amenable to process to court.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 3, 2001
State v. Kell
Jury misconduct not demonstrated just because certain jurors made calls on their cellular phones during jury deliberations.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 3, 2001
Washington v. Paul
Accused had sufficient understanding of standard range he was facing when plea agreement entered.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 3, 2001
State v. Turner
Sufficient evidence of constructive possession exists for crime of unlawfully possessing firearm where owner has control of vehicle and knows firearm inside.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 3, 2001
State v. Sutherland
Defendant's felony hit and run conviction is dismissed because state failed to allege knowledge element in charging document.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 3, 2001
State v. Smith
Routine court congestion isn't unavoidable or unforseeable, as such it is insufficient cause to extend trial date beyond requirement for speedy trial.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 3, 2001
State v. Bottrell
Evidence of post traumatic stress disorder should have been admitted to show defendant did not have intent to commit murder.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 2, 2001
State v. Pineda
Manslaughter charge dismissed when prosecution fails to prove that a crime was committed.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 2, 2001
State v. Green
Information charging bail jumping doesn't satisfy due process when document only references underlying offense by cause number.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 2, 2001
State v. Porter
Search of vehicle without warrant conducted some distance from location of arrest violates Washington Constitution.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 2, 2001
Washington v. Williams
State makes comments that effectively advocate exceptional sentence, thereby violating plea agreement to recommend sentence within standard range.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 2, 2001
State v. Johnson
Police officer's objectively reasonable belief that someone in home may need assistance is sufficient basis for entry into home without warrant.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 2, 2001
State v. Johnson
Defendant's consent to search was valid even though police officers already had search warrant.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 2, 2001
State v. Long
When conduct violates more than one criminal statute, it is within prosecution's discretion to choose which statute to charge.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 1, 2001
State v. Phillips
Information charging accused with first degree robbery adequately conveyed that accused was charged with using force to obtain property of another.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 1, 2001
State v. Reyes
Drug evidence inadmissable where state fails to show that officers would have inevitably discovered drugs during warrantless search.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 1, 2001
State v. Bauer
Search warrant based on informant's statements is legally valid where informant is reliable and has personal knowledge of accused's criminal activities.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 1, 2001
Hemby v. Hannigan
Order
Criminal Law and Procedure May 1, 2001
U.S. v. Lowe
Order
Criminal Law and Procedure May 1, 2001
U.S. v. Keifer
Order
Criminal Law and Procedure May 1, 2001
U.S. v. Helbach
Order
Criminal Law and Procedure May 1, 2001