For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
People v. Palumbo
Failure to specify degree of murder in felony murder verdict doesn't require reduction to second degree. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 16, 2001
U.S. v. Marin
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 16, 2001
Rittenhouse v. Hudson
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 16, 2001
U.S. v. Navarrette-Dominguez
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 16, 2001
Jones v. Hannigan
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 16, 2001
Shaffer v. Boone
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 16, 2001
U.S. v. Khleang
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 16, 2001
Burns v. Great Lakes Higher Education Corp.
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 16, 2001
U.S. v. Ulloa-Porras
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 16, 2001
U.S. v. Estrada-Hermosillo
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 16, 2001
Jordan v. Williams
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 16, 2001
People v. Lee
Ex post facto principles bar statutory revival of an expired criminal statute of limitations. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 15, 2001
People v. Lee
Review granted 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 15, 2001
State v. Purcell
Catholic juror was excluded from trial for first degree murder based on opposition to death penalty, not religion. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 15, 2001
In re Joseph F.
Police officer did not use excessive force in restraining juvenile on middle school grounds without permission. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 15, 2001
U.S. v. Ramirez
Police cannot ignore knock and announce rule in executing warrant when no exigent circumstances exist. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 12, 2001
U.S. v. Rojas-Mendoza
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 12, 2001
U.S. v. Lahi
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 12, 2001
U.S. v. Bustillos-Munoz
Drugs found in car during traffic stop are admissible because officer had reasonable belief that traffic violation occurred. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 12, 2001
U.S. v. Keeling
Accused's five-year supervised release term is improper. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 12, 2001
U.S. v. Kelly
Courts should not treat prisoner motions as Section 2255 motions unless movant agrees to recharacterization or is given opportunity to withdraw motion. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 12, 2001
Smith v. State of Kansas
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 12, 2001
U.S. v. Al-Bataineh
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 12, 2001
McMahon v. U.S.
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 12, 2001
U.S. v. Smith
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 12, 2001
U.S. v. Friday
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 12, 2001
U.S. v. Dorris
Commerce Clause provides state authority to regulate felon's possession of firearm and Armed Career Criminal Act allows enhancement of sentence. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 12, 2001
Nixon v. Honaker
Failure to receive notice of right to proceed does not meet exceptional circumstances test for court to overturn motion under Rule 60(b). 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 12, 2001
U.S. v. Maynard
Prosecutorial misconduct will not result in mistrial unless misconduct influences jury verdict and denies defendant right to fair trial. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 12, 2001
Williams v. Rohling
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 12, 2001
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.