| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
00-1146
|
US v. Smith
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 12, 2000 | |
|
00-1088
|
Hayes v. Novak
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 12, 2000 | |
|
00-6108
|
Castera v. Kaiser
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 12, 2000 | |
|
00-5063
|
Hoskins v. Hargett
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 12, 2000 | |
|
00-2184
|
Gardner v. Williams
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 12, 2000 | |
|
00-2148
|
Mieritz v. Williams
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 12, 2000 | |
|
00-2141
|
Marquez v. Williams
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 12, 2000 | |
|
00-2051
|
United States v. Wiseman
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 12, 2000 | |
|
99-4125
|
United States v. Goodman
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 12, 2000 | |
|
00-6241
|
Teague v. Hines
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 12, 2000 | |
|
99-8101
|
U.S. v. Rubio
10th Circuit may not review district cour'ts denial of downward adjustment where accused waived right to appeal in plea agreement. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 12, 2000 | |
|
00-4001
|
U.S. v. Berrocal
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 12, 2000 | |
|
99-2059
|
U.S. v. Fuentez
Trial court's limitation of accused's cross-examination of government's primary witness is not abuse of discretion. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 12, 2000 | |
|
98-3361
|
U.S. v. Becker
Court's admission of incriinating out-of-court statement by non-testifying confidential information is harmless error. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 12, 2000 | |
|
99-4115
|
U.S. v. Millet
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 12, 2000 | |
|
97-3229
|
U.S. v. Chanthadara
Lack of evidence of aggravating factors supporting death penalty combined with juror's exposure to judges comment was not harmless error. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 12, 2000 | |
|
98-8101
|
U.S. v. Johnson
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 12, 2000 | |
|
00-6076
|
U.S. v. South
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 12, 2000 | |
|
00-4014
|
U.S. v. Archuletta
Defendant who defrauded bank does not deserve enhanced sentence for engaging in 'more than minimal planning' for offense. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 12, 2000 | |
|
00-3182
|
Perkins v. Nelson
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 12, 2000 | |
|
00-7037
|
Brewer v. Gibson
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 12, 2000 | |
|
99-6362
|
US v. Harris
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 12, 2000 | |
|
00-2095
|
US v. Peters
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 12, 2000 | |
|
99-0468
|
State v. Bass
Unidentified bystanders' statements made at wreckage scene regarding defendant's fast driving at point prior to accident isn't within excited utterance exception to hearsay rule. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 9, 2000 | |
|
99-0937
|
State v. Smith
Defendant who violates probation for selling drugs must receive prison sentence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 6, 2000 | |
|
99-0324
|
State v. Welch
Defendant convicted of manufacturing methamphetamine may not be convicted separately for possession of chemicals and equipment. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 6, 2000 | |
|
99-0962
|
State v. Roark
Court may redact invalid language of search warrant and suppress only evidence seized pursuant to invalid portions. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 6, 2000 | |
|
99-4196
|
US v. Danhauer
Denial of motion to suppress upheld when good-faith exception applies even though affidavit in support of search warrant lacked probable cause. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 6, 2000 | |
|
00-3069
|
US v. Wheeler
Court can impose sentence above statutory mandatory minimum provided U.S. v. Belize criteria are met and its calculation methods are followed. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 6, 2000 | |
|
00-3186
|
U.S. v. Washington
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 6, 2000 |
