For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
U.S. v. Smith
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 15, 2000
Free v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 15, 2000
U.S. v. Woodlee
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 15, 2000
Plantz v. Massie
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 15, 2000
U.S. v. Glover
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 15, 2000
Lawrence v. Peters
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 15, 2000
U.S. v. Morales-Alejo
Pretrial detention does not toll a previously imposed term of parole. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 15, 2000
U.S. v. Gigley
Sentence should be based on actual quantity of methamphetamine, rather than quantity of methamphetamine-containing mixture, when the former results in longer sentence. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 14, 2000
Castillo v. United States
Words 'machine gun' in criminal statute create offense separate from other offenses under same statute. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 14, 2000
United States v. Hubbell
In prosecution for matters related to immunized testimony, prosecution has duty to prove proposed evidence is derived from independent source. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 14, 2000
U.S. v. Delreal-Ordones
Evidence is sufficient to support district court's deliberate-ignorance jury instruction. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 14, 2000
Stouffer v. Reynolds
Constitutional error is committed when new evidence creates reasonable doubt that did not otherwise exist. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 14, 2000
U.S. v. Mojica
Base level offense reduction should be considered when accused demonstrates firearm possession associated with lawful sporting purpose. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 14, 2000
U.S. v. Velarde
Court errs in refusing to make reliability determination prior to admitting expert testimony. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 14, 2000
U.S. v. Jackson
Police are not required to obtain warrant before conducting video surveillance that recorded activity easily observable to any passerby. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 14, 2000
U.S. v. Peterson
Government's legal arguments at sentencing hearing violate plea agreement but constitute harmless error. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 14, 2000
Welch v. City of Pratt
Instruction advising jury not to consider defendant's silence in arriving at verdict does not violate Fifth Amendment, even when it contains no warning against drawing adverse inferences. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 14, 2000
People v. Sherwood
Crime of vehicular eluding does not require that elusive behavior occur simultaneously with reckless driving. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 14, 2000
United States v. Morgan
Sentencing Guidelines for sexual abuse apply to alleged 'date rape' where both defendant and victim were intoxicated. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 14, 2000
People v. Deptowicz
Trial court's failure to impose mandatory restitution fine will not be corrected where prosecutor remained silent. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 14, 2000
U.S. v. Ayon-Meza
Police use of 'walk and talk' procedure to question defendant isn't tantamount to Fourth Amendment violation. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 14, 2000
U.S. v. Mett
ERISA trustee has right to invoke attorney-client privilege in criminal prosecution for embezzlement of pension funds. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 14, 2000
U.S. v. Du Bo
Indictment for violation of the Hobbs Act must specify the necessary criminal intent required. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 14, 2000
U.S. v. Monzon-Valenzuela
Sentence enhancement for obstruction of justice can't be based on contradiction between guilty verdict and defendant's trial testimony cited in presentence report. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 14, 2000
U.S. v. Perreault
Each act of downloading child pornography from the Internet is a separate crime for sentencing purposes. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 14, 2000
People v. Harris
5-year sentence enhancement is inappropriate where defendant doesn't admit and court never inquires whether defendant suffered a prior felony conviction. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 14, 2000
People v. Rivera
Since direct restitution to victim is compensatory, and not a fine or penalty, defendant isn't subject to penalty assessments. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 14, 2000
Fetterly v. Paskett
Extensive pretrial publicity discussing factual aspects of charges doesn't require change of venue in capital case. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 14, 2000
People v. Parker
Order for direct restitution isn't required where victim didn't testify as to how much, if any, money was taken from her. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 14, 2000
People v. Parker
Order for direct restitution isn't required where victim didn't testify as to how much, if any, money was taken from her. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 14, 2000
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.