| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
99-5021
|
Pickens v. Gibson
Videotaped confession of prior murder, obtained in violation of defendant's rights, cannot be shown to jury during sentencing phase of current murder case. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 15, 2000 | |
|
97-1023
|
Chambers v. Colorado Department of Corrections
Inmate's due process rights are violated when prison officials withhold monthly earned time credit without first conducting hearing. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 15, 2000 | |
|
00-6079
|
LaFevers v. Gibson
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 15, 2000 | |
|
98SC794
|
Garcia v. People
If court interrupts jury deliberations and suspends fact-finding functions to investigate alleged juror misconduct, its inquiry may not intrude into deliberative process. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 15, 2000 | |
|
99-0189
|
State v. Gaffney
Accused need not be informed of consequences of refusing to submit to blood and urine test where accused readily agrees to such. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 14, 2000 | |
|
98-0627
|
State v. Mach
Psychiatrist with child sexual abuse expertise need not be stricken as juror in trial for sexual acts with minor. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 14, 2000 | |
|
99-35269
|
U.S. v. Colvin
Limitations period for filing habeas petition begins to run when time has passed for appealing district court's entry of amended judgment. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 13, 2000 | |
|
97-50508
|
U.S. v. Newman
Defendant's prison sentence may not be reduced by amount of time spent in drug-treatment facility while on pre-trial release. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 9, 2000 | |
|
99-99007
|
Ashmus v. Woodford
Expedited habeas corpus procedure under Antiterrorism and Death Penalty Act requires state system for appointment, compensation and qualification of death penalty counsel. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 9, 2000 | |
|
H020554
|
Butler v. Superior Court (People)
Under Sexually Violent Predators Act, petition for recommitment must contain evaluations by two psychologists or psychiatrists. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 8, 2000 | |
|
98-1441
|
Roe v. Flores-Ortega
Counsel must consult defendant about appeal if either a rational defendant would want to appeal, or defendant shows interest in appealing. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2000 | |
|
99CA0568
|
People v. James
Access to sealed records is to be determined by division of court that decides appeal. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2000 | |
|
97CA2236
|
People v. Farrell
Admission of codefendant's statement violated defendant's constitutional right to confront and cross-examine witnesses. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2000 | |
|
98CA2085
|
People v. Whatley
Self-defense not allowed as an affirmative defense where there was no credible evidence to support the defense. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2000 | |
|
99-0211
|
State v. Cordova
Pellet gun can be deadly weapon. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2000 | |
|
99-0406
|
State v. Maggio
Probation terms forbidding defendant from contacting or residing with children are not unenforceable for vagueness. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2000 | |
|
F028540
|
People v. Borrelli
Stalking statute, which requires victim to suffer substantial emotional distress, is constitutional. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 3, 2000 | |
|
B129910
|
People v. McHenry
Restitution fines aren't subject penalty assessments under Penal Code Section 1464(a) and Government Code Section 76000(a). |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 3, 2000 | |
|
S078207
|
People v. Watson
Police decoy operation, that entices car theft by leaving keys in car ignition, is not entrapment. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 3, 2000 | |
|
F031127
|
People v. Guzman
Punishment enhancement proper when driver's drunken state is direct cause of passenger's 'great bodily injury.' |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 3, 2000 | |
|
B123817
|
People v. Flynn
Displaying gun after simple taking is sufficient cause to return conviction for robbery, rather than grand theft. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 3, 2000 | |
|
B126008
|
People v. Ranger Insurance Co.
Mailing of forfeiture notice extends time that summary judgment may be entered against bail bond. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 3, 2000 | |
|
D032206
|
People v. Stewart
Out-of-state conviction for attempted robbery with deadly weapon does not qualify as serious felony for enhancement under three strikes law. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 3, 2000 | |
|
C030480
|
People v. Young
Failure to obtain certificate of probable cause to challenge maximum sentence imposed based on plea agreement precludes constitutional challenge to sentence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 3, 2000 | |
|
S025880
|
People v. Phillips
Spontaneous declaration is properly excluded when there is no indication that declaration was from personal observation or repetition of someone else's statement. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 3, 2000 | |
|
A083712
|
People v. Roundtree
Rape is committed even when victim initially consents and then withdraws consent during sexual intercourse but is forced to complete the act. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 3, 2000 | |
|
D032206
|
People v. Stewart
Out-of-state conviction for attempted robbery with deadly weapon does not qualify as serious felony for enhancement under three strikes law. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 3, 2000 | |
|
B126008
|
People v. Ranger Insurance Co.
Mailing of forfeiture notice extends time that summary judgment may be entered against bail bond. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 3, 2000 | |
|
E024710
|
Price v. Superior Court (People)
Penal Code Section 784.7, which allows consolidation of certain cases arising in different counties, isn't constitutionally defective. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 3, 2000 | |
|
98-50674
|
U.S. v. Rodriguez-Lopez
District court has authority to reduce sentence on offer to stipulate to deportation even where government fails to consent through fast track plea agreement. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 3, 2000 |
