Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C099530
|
Mosley v. Superior Court (People)
Evidence recovered by warrantless automobile search should have been suppressed because totality of the circumstances did not support probable cause to believe that vehicle contained evidence of criminal wrongdoing. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Renner | Apr. 8, 2024 |
D081445
|
People v. Brown
Defendant's failure to bring a reconsideration motion was not dispositive because the ameliorative amendments to the mental health diversion statute occurred ten days prior to the hearing. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Kelety | Apr. 5, 2024 |
22-50240
|
U.S. v. Tat
Failing to challenge aspects of an initial sentence in a prior appeal did not result in waiver of right to challenge comparable aspects following de novo resentencing. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
S. Mendoza | Apr. 5, 2024 |
21-30251
|
U.S. v. Sapalasan
Inventory search was lawful where officer kept seized backpack in his police vehicle while he responded to other calls and completed the search near the end of his shift. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
R. Nelson | Apr. 2, 2024 |
A166001
|
People v. Beaudreaux
While the trial court erred in not providing counsel to defendant for his Section 1172.6 resentencing petition, the error was harmless because the jury found him to be the actual killer. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Streeter | Apr. 1, 2024 |
D082754
|
People v. Ayala
Trial court erred in admitting testimony of unavailable witness, who had been missing for over two years, but whom the prosecution did not begin searching for until two weeks before trial. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
W. Dato | Apr. 1, 2024 |
F080361
|
People v. Rojas
Though Assembly Bill 333 required reversal of defendant's active gang participation conviction, jury's gang-murder special-circumstance finding under Penal Code Section 190.2 was affirmed because substantial evidence supported that finding. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
C. Poochigian | Mar. 29, 2024 |
A169146
|
Modification: In re Seumanu
Because petitioner for habeas relief failed to adequately provide record materials and meet strict pleading requirements, all but one request for certificate of appealability was denied. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Streeter | Mar. 29, 2024 |
20-99011
|
Hart v. Broomfield
District court did not err in denying habeas relief, where California Supreme Court could have reasonably deemed potentially suppressed evidence immaterial. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
H. Thomas | Mar. 29, 2024 |
A166011
|
People v. Serrano
There was sufficient evidence of premeditation and deliberation for attempted murder since defendant fired multiple gun shots at pursuing officers. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
T. Jackson | Mar. 29, 2024 |
D081369
|
People v. McClelland
Court's ruling on 1172.6 petition after the parties agreed to submit the matter without a further evidentiary hearing did not violate defendant's due process rights. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Castillo | Mar. 28, 2024 |
B322561
|
People v. Hill
Denial of Section 1172.6 relief (felony murder amendment resentencing) does not implicate ex post facto principles. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
E. Lui | Mar. 27, 2024 |
C095986
|
Modification: People v. Barner
Despite trial court's error in using sentencing rather than commitment language, judgment was affirmed as court ultimately made the appropriate commitment order and calculation. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
L. Earl | Mar. 27, 2024 |
G061916
|
People v. Morris
Because jury's verdict encompassed findings leading to defendant being convicted under amended felony-murder statute, defendant was ineligible for resentencing under Penal Code Section 1172.6. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
T. Delaney | Mar. 25, 2024 |
21-15806
|
McLaughlin v. Oliver
Habeas corpus petitioner could not pursue claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel because he procedurally forfeited it by not first raising it in state court. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. Collins | Mar. 20, 2024 |
B328954
|
People v. Jackson
Encounter with police became an unjustified detention based on the officers' actions, including partially blocking defendant's vehicle door. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Wiley | Mar. 19, 2024 |
G062526
|
Gomez v. Superior Court (People)
Plaintiff's motion to challenge the judge who heard his resentencing petition was untimely because he filed it after she accepted his guilty plea. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
K. O'Leary | Mar. 19, 2024 |
F084751
|
People v. Carrillo
Under Penal Code Section 1473.7, defendant, seeking to vacate conviction because he did not understand possible adverse immigration consequences, may include probation violation penalties as part of his "sentence." |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. Franson | Mar. 19, 2024 |
22-340
|
Pulsifer v. U.S.
Despite the statute's use of "and" rather than "or," a criminal defendant is ineligible for safety value sentencing relief if he meets any (rather than all) of the criminal history point disqualifiers. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
E. Kagan | Mar. 18, 2024 |
C096979
|
P. v. Santos
|
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 14, 2024 | |
C096979
|
People v. Santos
Trial court did not err by not applying Three Strikes Reform Act to reduce defendant's sentence because defendant could only seek such relief through the Section 1170.126 petition process. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Renner | Mar. 15, 2024 |
H051311
|
People v. Superior Court (Woodward)
Double jeopardy did not bar refiling murder charge when the trial court's second dismissal order failed to clearly indicate that it was serving as an acquital. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
A. Danner | Mar. 15, 2024 |
C095986
|
People v. Barner
Despite trial court's error in using sentencing rather than commitment language, judgment was affirmed as court ultimately made the appropriate commitment order and calculation. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
L. Earl | Mar. 14, 2024 |
B317938
|
Modification: People v. Felix
Trial court properly denied motion to suppress defendant's confession given to undercover detective posing as jail cellmate, post-invocation of right to counsel. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
E. Grimes | Mar. 14, 2024 |
A169146
|
In re Seumanu
Because petitioner for habeas relief failed to adequately provide record materials and meet strict pleading requirements, all but one request for certificate of appealability was denied. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Streeter | Mar. 13, 2024 |
G060049
|
People v. Lewis
Sufficient evidence supported defendant's rape conviction because it was reasonable to conclude criminal defendant knew the victim's intoxication level made her incapable of consenting to sexual intercourse. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
K. O'Leary | Mar. 11, 2024 |
22-50047
|
U.S. v. Layfield
Twenty-one-day delay between defendant's detention and first appearance before a judge did not constitute a Speedy Trial Act violation. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Owens | Mar. 8, 2024 |
B317938
|
People v. Felix
Trial court properly denied motion to suppress defendant's confession given to undercover detective posing as jail cellmate, post-invocation of right to counsel. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
E. Grimes | Mar. 8, 2024 |
H050320
|
People v. Killian
A charge for tampering with a VIN under Vehicle Code Section 10802 includes a defendant who transfers the registration to himself. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
A. Danner | Mar. 7, 2024 |
A168018
|
People v. Superior Court (Farley)
Prosecution satisfied low preliminary bar of showing group was an organization, albeit informal, with a common purpose as statutorily required to proceed with prosecution of gang-related special circumstance. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
T. Brown | Mar. 7, 2024 |