Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
98-3176
|
Taylor v. United States Bureau of Prisons
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 23, 1999 | |
98-6386
|
Skamfer v. Doyle
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 23, 1999 | |
98-6127
|
Hogan v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 23, 1999 | |
98-5155
|
U.S. v. Fritz
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 23, 1999 | |
98-6185
|
Woods v. Klinger
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 23, 1999 | |
97-4189
|
U.S. v. Thompson
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 23, 1999 | |
98-1164
|
U.S. v. Olguin-Rivera
Covered area in back of sport utility vehicle is within scope of automobile search permitted incident to arrest. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 23, 1999 | |
98-7068
|
Parks v. Hargett
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 23, 1999 | |
98-437
|
Calderon v. Coleman
Appellate court must inquire whether instruction error has substantial injurious effect on jury prior to reversing death sentence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 23, 1999 | |
A077239
|
People v. Hatfield
Defendant's right of confrontation isn't violated by Sexually Violent Predator Act's statutory scheme. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 23, 1999 | |
B118534
|
People v. Scheer
Conviction for evading police is inadmissible to show intent and motive in felony hit and run case. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 21, 1999 | |
B118285
|
People v. Macauley
Arson suffices as crime involving "force or violence" under statute confining mentally disordered offenders. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 21, 1999 | |
B126210
|
Garcetti v. Superior Court (Lyles)
Under Sexually Violent Predator Act, trial court may hear commitment petition when defendant isn't lawfully in custody. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 21, 1999 | |
98-1352
|
Kilgore v. Neal
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 19, 1999 | |
98-3154
|
Walling v. State of Kansas
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 19, 1999 | |
98-2112
|
Conner v. Lemaster
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 19, 1999 | |
98-2056
|
U.S. v. Chavez-Huerta
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 19, 1999 | |
98-3059
|
U.S. v. Shields
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 19, 1999 | |
98-6208
|
Kiel v. Scott
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 19, 1999 | |
S075045
|
People v. Hernandez
Hearsay exception regarding threats of harm involves sufficient indicia of reliability to be constitutional. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 19, 1999 | |
S075360
|
People v. White
Courts failure to grant defendants newtrial motion based on instructional error,doesnt merit reversal of conviction. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 19, 1999 | |
D028246
|
People v. Mitchell
Assistance of counsel is ineffective when sufficiency of the evidence of a prior 'strike' isn't raised on appeal. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 19, 1999 | |
D030198
|
People v. Durant
Three strikes law requires consecutive sentences for crimes with different facts, committed on separate occasions. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 19, 1999 | |
D031565
|
People v. Figueroa
Violation of administrative regulation isn't a defense in criminal prosecutions. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 19, 1999 | |
A084054
|
People v. The Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Whitley)
Sexually violent predator whose parole is erroneously revoked is still under state's jurisdiction. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 19, 1999 | |
G021290
|
People v. Emmal
A vehicle driven 20 feet, while under defendant's control, is enough to establish element of 'transportation.' |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 19, 1999 | |
98-7072
|
U.S. v. Hurd
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 18, 1999 | |
98-1177
|
Haynie v. Furlong
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 18, 1999 | |
98-2222
|
Adams v. Lemaster
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 18, 1999 | |
98-7083
|
Ross v. United States Marshal
"Fleeing from justice" requires proof by preponderance of the evidence that the accused intended to avoid arrest. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 18, 1999 |