Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
98-1295
|
Rice v. Christopher
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 10, 1999 | |
98-5096
|
Harjo v. Kaiser
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 10, 1999 | |
97-2247
|
Gonzales v. Lytle
Failure to allow the jury to consider the recantation of testimony incriminating a defendant, is error. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 10, 1999 | |
98-5021
|
Riggs v. California
Although petty offenses don't qualify as serious 'strike' crimes, certiorari is denied where habeas relief is possible. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 10, 1999 | |
S074229
|
People v. Krantz
Undercover agent's alleged offer to pay for protected artifacts doesn't support entrapment defense. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 10, 1999 | |
S074317
|
People v. Contreras
Miscarriage of justice requiring reversal results from prosecutor's misconduct and exclusion of opinion evidence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 10, 1999 | |
S074299
|
People v. Diaz
Court's failure to instruct jury immediately prior to deliberations doesn't constitute reversible error. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 10, 1999 | |
98-6072
|
U.S. v. Fletcher
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 9, 1999 | |
97-1427
|
Morgan v. Gertz
A defendant's constitutional rights aren't violated by the destruction of evidence where defendant is acquitted. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 9, 1999 | |
98-7085
|
U.S. v. Hensley
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 9, 1999 | |
97-1313
|
U.S. v. Norman
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 8, 1999 | |
98-6304
|
U.S. v. Veal
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 8, 1999 | |
98-6018
|
U.S. v. McIntyre
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 5, 1999 | |
98-5045
|
U.S. v. Chaney
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 5, 1999 | |
98-5039
|
U.S. v. Kirtman
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 5, 1999 | |
97-6105
|
Cooks v. Ward
Ineffective assistance of counsel in death penalty sentencing hearing wasnt prejudicial because result wasnt affected. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 4, 1999 | |
98-6263
|
Moore v. Ward
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 4, 1999 | |
98-5017
|
U.S. v. Leonard
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 4, 1999 | |
98-5171
|
Dreher v. Hargett
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 4, 1999 | |
98-7048
|
U.S. v. McIntosh
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 4, 1999 | |
98-3161
|
U.S. v. Draine
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 4, 1999 | |
98-6266
|
Moore v. Klinger
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 4, 1999 | |
98-2093
|
Blackburn v. Williams
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 4, 1999 | |
98-1294
|
Bishop v. Romer
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 4, 1999 | |
98-6264
|
U.S. v. Perez-Campos
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 4, 1999 | |
97-0843
|
Arizona v. Vigil
Admission of two prior bad acts to prove identity and motive constitutes error, where neither is at issue. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 3, 1999 | |
98-6326
|
Batten v. Fields
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 3, 1999 | |
98-6024
|
U.S. v. Washington
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 3, 1999 | |
98-6002
|
U.S. v. Tucker
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 3, 1999 | |
98-1319
|
Perko v. United States of America
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 3, 1999 |