For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Leah B. v. Michael V.
Appellant was not permitted to use civil harassment order process to collaterally attack confidential child dependency and adoption proceeding concerning her biological daughter. 		Dependency 2DCA/6 Oct. 23, 2020
County of San Diego v. P.B.
Lower court improperly attributed nonexistent timeshare to guideline for child support calculation to penalize an allegedly non-cooperative parent. 		Dependency 4DCA/1 Oct. 20, 2020
In re Anna T.
Juvenile court's post-termination custody orders were vacated because juvenile court failed to follow procedure outlined in Welfare and Institutions Code Section 362.4. 		Dependency 2DCA/7 Oct. 15, 2020
In re N.S.
When ordering permanent plan for Indian child subject to Indian Child Welfare Act, juvenile court is not restricted to permanent plan that child's tribe selects. 		Dependency 4DCA/1 Oct. 12, 2020
In re Dominic F.
Substantial evidence supported the juvenile court's finding that the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 did not apply to minors. 		Dependency 2DCA/8 Oct. 8, 2020
In re S.S.
Juvenile court's detriment finding was based on father's poverty, which is barred by statute and case law. 		Dependency 4DCA/2 Oct. 6, 2020
In re J.P.
Pursuant to Family Code Section 7642, juvenile court had authority to determine that its prior order denying presumed parent status should be modified. 		Dependency 6DCA Oct. 5, 2020
In re Samuel A.
Trial court incorrectly characterized appellant's Welfare and Institutions Code Section 388 petition as untimely new trial motion under Code of Civil Procedure Section 659. 		Dependency 2DCA/7 Sep. 25, 2020
In re J.W.-P.
Father was prejudiced by the trial court's failure to provide him with the notice of the procedure to protect his parental rights mandated by Welfare and Institutions Code Section 316.2(b). 		Dependency 1DCA/5 Sep. 10, 2020
In re V.L.
Reasonable trier of fact could have found it highly probable that placement of minors with father would pose substantial risk of harm by exposure to future domestic violence. 		Dependency 2DCA/2 Sep. 3, 2020
In re A.C.
The absence of a relationship between father and daughter was a permissible factor in juvenile court's decision to place daughter with grandmother. 		Dependency 2DCA/8 Sep. 1, 2020
Georgeanne G. v. Superior Court (Los Angeles County Dept. of Children and Family Services)
Juvenile court may not consider a parent's 'lack of insight' at Welfare and Institutions Code Section 366.22 permanency review hearing. 		Dependency 2DCA/7 Aug. 21, 2020
In re J.W.
The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act does not regulate a California trial court's fundamental jurisdiction. 		Dependency 4DCA/2 Aug. 13, 2020
In re I.B.
Trial court did not abuse its discretion in concluding Mother demonstrated changed circumstances required under a Welfare and Institutions Code Section 388 petition. 		Dependency 4DCA/3 Aug. 12, 2020
In re S.P.
Department of Children and Family Services failed to act with due diligence in notifying father of jurisdiction but error was harmless. 		Dependency 2DCA/5 Aug. 4, 2020
Serena M. v. Superior Court (Fresno County Dept. of Social Services)
Juvenile court's order denying in-person visitation from mother was not reasonable because evidence did not support depriving mother of in-person visitation for 18-month period. 		Dependency 5DCA Jul. 28, 2020
In re T.S.
Evidence regarding custody and visitation are necessarily relevant to custody proceeding; thus court was empowered to modify prior orders, even absent Welfare and Institutions Code Section 388 petition. 		Dependency 2DCA/7 Jul. 23, 2020
In re J.M.
Parent's reformation efforts may overcome presumption that her son remaining in stable and potentially permanent foster home is in his best interests. 		Dependency 2DCA/1 Jun. 22, 2020
Conservatorship of Jose B.
Requirement under Lanterman-Petris-Short Act that trial must commence within 10 days of demand is directive, not mandatory. 		Dependency 2DCA/7 Jun. 22, 2020
In re B.P.
Orders issued before dispositional order on Welfare and Institutions Code Section 342 petition are interlocutory and not appealable. 		Dependency 2DCA/8 Jun. 4, 2020
In re Samantha H.
It is not required in adoption proceedings to inquire whether a willing adoptive parent was first advised but rejected guardianship. 		Dependency 2DCA/8 May 28, 2020
In re E.E.
Dependency jurisdiction does not require actual neglect; rather there must be a 'substantial risk' that the child will be neglected. 		Dependency 4DCA/2 May 26, 2020
Modification: In re D.B.
Father's violence, verbal abuse, racism, impulsivity, and lack of insight created substantial evidence that daughter faced substantial risk of serious emotional damage. 		Dependency 2DCA/8 May 21, 2020
In re K.T.
Substantial evidence did not support finding that non-offending Father needed to take parenting course in order to protect daughter. 		Dependency 2DCA/1 May 15, 2020
In re Mary C.
Courts are not required to find children 'generally' adoptable, rather the children must 'likely' be adopted within a reasonable time. 		Dependency 1DCA/4 May 7, 2020
In re D.B.
Father's violence, verbal abuse, racism, impulsivity, and lack of insight created substantial evidence that daughter faced substantial risk of serious emotional damage. 		Dependency 2DCA/8 May 6, 2020
In re S.O.
No joint recommendation report was required under Welfare and Institution code Section 241.1 because the matter was three years into dual status jurisdiction. 		Dependency 4DCA/2 May 6, 2020
In re M.R.
Dependency case plans must specifically identify how services will accomplish specific goals; broad language recommending future unknown services is insufficient. 		Dependency 5DCA May 1, 2020
In re G.C.
Substantial evidence supported juvenile court's order removing children from parents' custody. 		Dependency 4DCA/2 Apr. 28, 2020
In re Aubrey T.
Evidence was insufficient to support juvenile court's finding that father abandoned daughter within meaning of Family Code Section 7822. 		Dependency 2DCA/7 Apr. 28, 2020
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.