Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
99-2203
|
Phillips v. Widnall
Order |
Employment Law |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
99-3239
|
Scherer v. G.E. Capital Corp.
Order |
Employment Law |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
98-1085
|
Heno v. Sprint/United Management Co.
In employment discrimination suit, failure to seek jury clarification regarding inconsistent verdict forms, requires new trial. |
Employment Law |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
99-5088
|
Ketcher v. City of Tulsa
Order |
Employment Law |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
97-6226, 97-6249 and 98-6020
|
Deboard v. Sunshine Mining and Refining Co.
Former employees, promised lifetime insurance benefits, are entitled to the same type and level of benefits provided to current salaried employees. |
Employment Law |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
99-2125
|
Silva v. Good will Industries of New Mexico
Order |
Employment Law |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
99-5080
|
Bradley v. Gear Products
Order |
Employment Law |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
98-4074
|
Stone v. Autoliv Asp Inc.
Single discriminatory comment is not sufficient to find that discharge decision was discriminatory. |
Employment Law |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
98-5262
|
Tutton v. ABC Supply Co.
Order |
Employment Law |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
98-0229
|
Najar v. State of Arizona
Employee, alleging unlawful retaliation based on denial of promotion, must show retaliatory motivation or intent. |
Employment Law |
|
Apr. 10, 2000 | |
99-6219
|
Humphrey v. Widnall
Order |
Employment Law |
|
Apr. 5, 2000 | |
99-5099
|
Coker v. Ball Janitor Service Inc.
Order |
Employment Law |
|
Apr. 5, 2000 | |
99-1006
|
Armendariz v. City and County of Denver
Order |
Employment Law |
|
Apr. 5, 2000 | |
A080976 and A082259
|
Begnal v. Canfield & Associates Inc.
When jury finds employer guilty of age discrimination, older replacement for terminated employee doesn't warrant judgment notwithstanding verdict. |
Employment Law |
|
Mar. 31, 2000 | |
C031652
|
Robison v. City of Manteca
Recovery agreement between employer and employee is valid when employee cannot substantiate claims of undue influence and unconscionability. |
Employment Law |
|
Mar. 31, 2000 | |
B129578
|
Ware v. WCAB
Injured golf caddie is employee entitled to workers' compensation benefits. |
Employment Law |
|
Mar. 31, 2000 | |
B122436
|
Taylor v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
Employee of civilian contractor operating on federal military enclave may pursue state whistleblower claim against contractor. |
Employment Law |
|
Mar. 31, 2000 | |
98-16437
|
Santa Maria v. Pacific Bell
When employee should've known of possible disability discrimination claim, equitable tolling won't excuse untimely filing of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission charge. |
Employment Law |
|
Mar. 30, 2000 | |
99-5014
|
Qualls v. Apfel
Employee is not entitled to disability benefits where evidence substantially shows employee can perform limited light and sedentary work. |
Employment Law |
|
Mar. 29, 2000 | |
S085021
|
Hovanec v. Van Nuys Airport Corp.
Restaurant worker alleging unlawful discrimination is denied relief for failure to file timely claim. |
Employment Law |
|
Mar. 23, 2000 | |
98CA2263
|
McIntosh v. Board of Education of School District No. 1
School board may not dismiss probationary teacher who acted in compliance with boards disciplinary policy. |
Employment Law |
|
Mar. 22, 2000 | |
98SC304
|
Bodaghi v. Department of Natural Resources
Where prima facie case of discrimination is proven and factfinder disbelieves employer's stated lawful purpose, factfinder may infer unlawful discriminatory conduct. |
Employment Law |
|
Mar. 16, 2000 | |
97-2099
|
Migneault v. Peck
University officials are immune from equal protection claim when it exists independent of Age Discrimination Employment Act claim. |
Employment Law |
|
Mar. 15, 2000 | |
99-2181
|
Creusere v. Murphy
Order |
Employment Law |
|
Mar. 15, 2000 | |
98CA1271
|
Mohr v. Kelley
Congressional candidate is not liable for wages owed to campaign workers because the campaign is a separate legal entity. |
Employment Law |
|
Mar. 6, 2000 | |
98-1370
|
Smoke v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
Order |
Employment Law |
|
Mar. 3, 2000 | |
98-6412
|
Sturdivan v. Tri-State Feeders Inc.
Order |
Employment Law |
|
Mar. 3, 2000 | |
99-2126
|
Montoya v. State of New Mexico
Order |
Employment Law |
|
Mar. 3, 2000 | |
99-1122
|
Geary v. Dames and Moore Corp.
Order |
Employment Law |
|
Mar. 3, 2000 | |
98-16141
|
Marchisheck v. San Mateo County
Employee's son did not have "serious health condition" which would allow time off from work under federal and state statutes. |
Employment Law |
|
Mar. 3, 2000 |