For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Mejia v. City of Los Angeles (California Home Development LLC)
Home developer planning project that would affect traffic and wildlife must submit environmental impact report. 		Environmental Law Aug. 30, 2005
Save Our Sonoran Inc. v. Flowers
Court conducted proper analysis in finding potential for environmental injury existed in waterway project. 		Environmental Law Aug. 23, 2005
City of Arcadia v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Federal agency was authorized to approve state limits on dumping trash in Los Angeles River even after establishing its own limits. 		Environmental Law Aug. 23, 2005
Arc Ecology v. U.S. Dept. of the Air Force
Statutory presumption against extraterritoriality precludes foreign claimants from requesting relief under CERCLA. 		Environmental Law Aug. 23, 2005
Sierra Club v. California Coastal Commission (Catellus Residential Group)
Coastal commission need not consider environmental effects of portions of construction project outside coastal zone when issuing development permit. 		Environmental Law Aug. 19, 2005
Salmon Protection and Watershed Network v. County of Marin (Hedlund)
County cannot grant categorical exemption from review of project that may significantly effect environment. 		Environmental Law Aug. 11, 2005
County Sanitation District No. 2 of Los Angeles County v. County of Kern
County must prepare environmental impact report for ordinance restricting application of sewage sludge. 		Environmental Law Aug. 9, 2005
City of Burbank v. State Water Resources Control Board
Regional water board need not consider economic cost of complying with pollutant restrictions that are less stringent than federal standards. 		Environmental Law Aug. 9, 2005
Center for Biological Diversity v. Veneman
U.S. Forest Service had mandatory duty under Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to consider rivers identified in its report in planning process. 		Environmental Law Aug. 8, 2005
Great Basin Mine Watch v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Protection Agency was authorized to grant permission to state of Nevada to split clean air area. 		Environmental Law Jul. 26, 2005
Muzzy Ranch v. Solano County Airport Land Use Commission
Compatibility rather than precise conformity is required between proposed project and standards created in study under Public Utilities Code section 21675(b) 		Environmental Law Jul. 26, 2005
The Lands Council v. Powell
Federal watershed restoration project in Idaho Panhandle National Forest violates environmental protection laws. 		Environmental Law Jul. 25, 2005
Sierra Club v. West Side Irrigation District (City of Tracy)
Two assignments by different water districts are separate and independent projects under state environmental laws. 		Environmental Law Jun. 20, 2005
Leavitt v. County of Madera
Requirement that petitioner request hearing in writ of mandate proceeding must be construed literally. 		Environmental Law Jun. 17, 2005
Building Industry Association of San Diego County v. State Water Resources Control Board
Water Resources Control Board has authority under federal law to include permit provisions requiring compliance with state water quality standards. 		Environmental Law Jun. 17, 2005
Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of Bakersfield
City must assess both individual and cumulative environmental impact of two shopping centers located 3.6 miles apart. 		Environmental Law Jun. 17, 2005
Alaska v. United States
Special Master correctly recommended that Alaska shall not take title to certain submerged lands. 		Environmental Law Jun. 13, 2005
Cooper Industries v. Aviall Services
Private party who voluntarily undertakes cleanup may not obtain contribution from other liable parties. 		Environmental Law Mar. 23, 2005
Ocean Advocates v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
District court must reevaluate whether issuance of permit to build addition to oil refinery dock violates Magnuson Amendment. 		Environmental Law Mar. 14, 2005
Maintain Our Desert Environment v. Town of Apple Valley (Pluto Development Inc.)
Town was authorized to approve development project without disclosing that Wal-Mart would be eventual user. 		Environmental Law Feb. 15, 2005
High Sierra Hikers v. Blackwell
Forest Service did not comply with National Environment Policy Act when it issued multi-year special-use permits. 		Environmental Law Feb. 14, 2005
The Pocket Protectors v. City of Sacramento (Regis Homes of Northern California Inc.)
Because there is sufficient evidence that housing project may have significant effects on environment, environmental impact report must be prepared. 		Environmental Law Feb. 14, 2005
Grand Canyon Trust v. Tucson Electric Power Co.
Environmental group may sue power company for operating coal plant in violation of Clean Air Act. 		Environmental Law Feb. 14, 2005
Cetacean Community v. Bush
Sea animals lack standing to bring environmental suit under own name. 		Environmental Law Feb. 14, 2005
Building Industry Association of San Diego County v. State Water Resources Control Board
Water Resources Control Board has authority under federal law to include permit provisions requiring compliance with state water quality standards. 		Environmental Law Feb. 13, 2005
The Lands Council v. Powell
Federal watershed restoration project in Idaho Panhandle National Forest violates environmental protection laws. 		Environmental Law Feb. 8, 2005
High Sierra Hikers Assoc. v. Blackwell
Forest Service did not comply with National Environment Policy Act when it issued multi-year special-use permits. 		Environmental Law Jan. 18, 2005
Save Our Sonoran Inc. v. Flowers
Court conducted proper analysis in finding potential for environmental injury existed in waterway project. 		Environmental Law Jan. 18, 2005
Sierra Club v. County of Napa (Beringer Wine Estates)
Permit allowing wine maker to develop land within Napa Valley does not violate California Environmental Quality Act. 		Environmental Law Jan. 18, 2005
Vigil v. Leavitt
Environmental agency will reconsider whether state used adequate measures to minimize diesel emissions. 		Environmental Law Jan. 18, 2005
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.