Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A153521
|
Duncan v. Kihagi
Complaints from other tenants were not considered character evidence regarding the landlord because they countered attempts to depict plaintiff as an overly sensitive tenant. |
Evidence |
|
J. Humes | Sep. 3, 2021 |
B297023
|
Modification: Zuniga v. Alexandria Care Center, LLC
Trial court erred in rejecting expert testimony simply because it was based on inadmissible evidence, without further consideration of reliability of data used, and error was prejudicial. |
Evidence |
|
D. Perluss | Aug. 17, 2021 |
B297023
|
Zuniga v. Alexandria Care Center, LLC
Trial court erred in rejecting expert testimony simply because it was based on inadmissible evidence, without further consideration of reliability of data used, and error was prejudicial. |
Evidence |
|
D. Perluss | Aug. 16, 2021 |
D076708
|
Mai v. HKT Cal, Inc.
Attorney invoices can be used to corroborate plaintiff's testimony that amount billed was paid and as evidence of amount's reasonability. |
Evidence |
|
W. Dato | Jul. 14, 2021 |
19-10017
|
U.S. v. Lopez
Although government's redacted interrogation clips risked misleading jury because it truncated defendant's explanation, error was harmless given strength of government's evidence, and mitigating effect of defendant's trial testimony. |
Evidence |
|
C. Bea | Jul. 7, 2021 |
19-10133
|
United States v. Charley
There was no logical connection between prior incidents and charged assault other than implication that defendant has propensity for violence. |
Evidence |
|
C. Bea | Jun. 14, 2021 |
A158179
|
Amended Opinion: People v. Hardy
Defendant's conviction reversed because trial court erred in admitting Shotspotter evidence without first holding 'Kelly/Frye' hearing. |
Evidence |
|
T. Stewart | Jun. 11, 2021 |
A157205
|
People v. Lund
Trial court did not err by admitting expert testimony that relied on software using hash value data because that data was not offered for truth of matter asserted. |
Evidence |
|
T. Brown | Jun. 3, 2021 |
19-16636
|
Hardeman v. Monsanto
District court did not abuse its discretion in admitting International Agency for Research on Cancer's classification of glyphosate as 'probably carcinogenic.' |
Evidence |
|
R. Nelson | May 17, 2021 |
B302236
|
People v. Gray
Admission of bodycam footage containing excited utterance by unavailable declarant did not violate due process in probation violation hearing. |
Evidence |
|
B. Hoffstadt | May 4, 2021 |
C090172
|
People v. Thomas
Trial court did not err when it allowed propensity evidence from co-defendant to show defendant had a propensity to commit child abuse. |
Evidence |
|
R. Robie | Apr. 30, 2021 |
C089046
|
People v. Clark
Trial court erroneously admitted into evidence Defendant's prior uncharged act of constructive possession of a firearm because there was no connected motive between the current offenses. |
Evidence |
|
W. Murray | Apr. 8, 2021 |
A158179
|
Modification: People v. Hardy
Defendant's conviction reversed because trial court erred in admitting Shotspotter evidence without first holding 'Kelly/Frye' hearing. |
Evidence |
|
T. Stewart | Mar. 23, 2021 |
A158179
|
People v. Hardy
Defendant's conviction reversed because trial court erred in admitting Shotspotter evidence without first holding 'Kelly/Frye' hearing. |
Evidence |
|
T. Stewart | Feb. 26, 2021 |
S084996
|
People v. Chhoun
Trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting evidence of other similar crimes to show defendant's state of mind. |
Evidence |
|
C. Corrigan | Feb. 12, 2021 |
D077483
|
In re Morse
Trial court erred in sustaining petitioner's hearsay objection at Welfare and Institution Code Section 6602 probable cause hearing because Section 6602 is an implied exception to hearsay rule. |
Evidence |
|
P. Benke | Jan. 7, 2021 |
S154459
|
People v. Turner
Defendant's conviction for fetal murder was reversed because trial court's admission of hearsay testimony about fetus's viability was harmful error. |
Evidence |
|
C. Corrigan | Dec. 1, 2020 |
A157917
|
People v. Williams
Trial court did not err in determining that it could consider hearsay information contained in this court's prior opinion on defendant's appeal because hearsay information contained therein was reliable. |
Evidence |
|
I. Petrou | Nov. 23, 2020 |
H047473
|
Modification: Menifee v. Superior Court (The People)
Although certain components of gang expert's testimony were inadmissible under 'People v. Sanchez,' remaining admissible evidence presented at preliminary hearing was sufficient to hold defendant to answer. |
Evidence |
|
E. Premo | Nov. 19, 2020 |
H047473
|
Menifee v. Superior Court (The People)
Although certain components of gang expert's testimony were inadmissible under 'People v. Sanchez,' remaining admissible evidence presented at preliminary hearing was sufficient to hold defendant to answer. |
Evidence |
|
E. Premo | Nov. 17, 2020 |
G057657
|
Modification: People v. Son
An officer who has extensively reviewed a video may offer a narration, pointing out particulars that a casual observer might not see. |
Evidence |
|
R. Ikola | Nov. 10, 2020 |
18-50120
|
U.S. v. Bacon
When panel of this court concludes that district court committed non-harmless 'Daubert' error, panel has discretion to impose remedy 'as may be just under circumstances.' |
Evidence |
|
S. Thomas | Nov. 6, 2020 |
C077992
|
People v. Winkler
During murder trial of defendant's third wife, trial court erred by presenting evidence of defendant's second wife's death in 1999, but error was harmless given strength of admissible evidence. |
Evidence |
|
W. Murray | Nov. 4, 2020 |
C083250
|
Carroll v. Commission on Teacher Credentialing
Trial court abused its discretion by permitting plaintiff's counsel to question defendant witnesses on, and asking jury to draw negative inferences from, defendant's exercise of attorney-client privilege. |
Evidence |
|
H. Hull | Oct. 26, 2020 |
G057657
|
People v. Son
An officer who has extensively reviewed a video may offer a narration, pointing out particulars that a casual observer might not see. |
Evidence |
|
R. Ikola | Oct. 21, 2020 |
E074417
|
People v. Villa
While evidence of victim's application for U visa was relevant to show motive to testify falsely, trial court did not abuse its discretion by excluding it under Evidence Code Section 352. |
Evidence |
|
M. Slough | Oct. 20, 2020 |
B298637
|
People v. DelRio
Evidence of victim's previous domestic violence arrests was admissible when defendant claimed self-defense in homicide case. |
Evidence |
|
J. Wiley | Sep. 2, 2020 |
18-10446
|
U.S. v. Berckmann
District court did not abuse its discretion by admitting evidence pertaining to other attacks as non-propensity evidence. |
Evidence |
|
J. Owens | Aug. 21, 2020 |
18-10500
|
U.S. v. Lague
A medical professional's practice-wide prescription data is probative of unlawful intent in a 21 U.S.C. Section 841 charge. |
Evidence |
|
J. Wallace | Aug. 21, 2020 |
A156843
|
People v. Liggins
Defendant's due process right to confront witness was violated at his probation revocation hearing when hearsay statements were admitted without a showing of witness unavailability or good cause. |
Evidence |
|
J. Streeter | Aug. 10, 2020 |