This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Valenzuela Gallardo v. Barr
8 U.S.C. Section 1101(a)(43)(S), which describes an aggravated felony 'offense relating to obstruction of justice,' requires a nexus to an ongoing or pending proceeding or investigation.
Immigration 9th Aug. 7, 2020
Attias v. Crandall
Appellant failed to establish that his lapse in lawful immigration status was 'through no fault of his own or for technical reasons' making him ineligible for adjustment of status.
Immigration 9th Jul. 31, 2020
Orellana v. Barr
Board of Immigration Appeals did not err in concluding that criminal stalking conviction under Penal Code Section 646.9(a) was a crime involving moral turpitude.
Immigration 9th Jul. 29, 2020
Dominguez v. Barr
Petitioner's state conviction of manufacturing marijuana was categorical match to aggravated felony drug trafficking offense under Controlled Substances Act; thus, petitioner was removable.
Immigration 9th Jul. 22, 2020
Silva v. Barr
Petitioner's three separate theft offenses in violation of California Penal Code Section 484(a) constituted crimes involving moral turpitude.
Immigration 9th Jul. 13, 2020
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr
Rule denying asylum to aliens arriving at US border with Mexico unless they first applied for, and had been denied, asylum in Mexico or another country they traveled through, was unlawful.
Immigration 9th Jul. 7, 2020
Diaz-Torres v. Barr
Petitioner's proposed social group comprised of 'Mexican professionals who refuse to cooperate with drug cartels' was not socially distinct for withholding of removal eligibility.
Immigration 9th Jun. 30, 2020
Xochihua-Jaimes v. Barr
Petitioner established requisite level of torture with acquiescence by public official by credibly testifying that she was beaten severely and threatened with death at gunpoint by drug cartel, while Mexican police laughed.
Immigration 9th Jun. 29, 2020
Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam
As applied here, Section 1252(e)(2) of Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act did not violate the Suspension Clause.
Immigration USSC Jun. 26, 2020
Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of University of California
Department of Homeland Security's decision to rescind DACA was arbitrary and capricious under Administrative Procedure Act.
Immigration USSC Jun. 19, 2020
Cordoba v. Barr
'Wealthy landowners' in Colombia do not constitute a cognizable particular social group for purposes of asylum and withholding of removal.
Immigration 9th Jun. 17, 2020
Tejeda v. Barr
Petitioner's plea agreement, charging document, and minute order were cognizable for modified categorical-approach purposes and established elements of his offense.
Immigration 9th Jun. 9, 2020
Roy v. Barr
Petitioner failed to establish equal protection violation with respect to 8 U.S.C. Section 1432(a)(3), the applicable derivative-citizenship statute.
Immigration 9th Jun. 5, 2020
Lepe Moran v. Barr
Petitioner's conviction for felony vehicular flight from pursuing police car while driving against traffic is categorically a crime involving moral turpitude that made him removable.
Immigration 9th Jun. 3, 2020
Grigoryan v. Barr
Government violated petitioners' due process rights by failing to provide them full and fair opportunity to rebut government's fraud allegations.
Immigration 9th Jun. 3, 2020
Nasrallah v. Barr
8 U.S.C. Sections 1252(a)(2)(C) and (D) do not preclude judicial review of noncitizen's factual challenges to Convention Against Torture order.
Immigration USSC Jun. 2, 2020
Lona v. Barr
Petitioner not entitled to equitable tolling because she untimely failed to act with due diligence in raising errors.
Immigration 9th May 18, 2020
Aguilar Fermin v. Barr
Substantial evidence supported denial of relief and Notice to Appear for removal proceedings need not contain time, date, and location to vest immigration courts with jurisdiction.
Immigration 9th May 6, 2020
Mero v. Barr
Nevada's possession of visual presentation depicting sexual conduct of person under 16 years of age is not a 'sexual abuse of a minor' aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. Section 1101(a)(43)(A).
Immigration 9th May 4, 2020
Perez v. Barr
Suspension Clause does not require government compensation of court-appointed counsel as long as pro bono counsel is available.
Immigration 9th Apr. 28, 2020
Barton v. Barr
For purposes of cancellation-of-removal eligibility, 8 U.S.C. Section 1182(a)(2) offense committed during initial seven years of residence does not need to be one of the offenses of removal.
Immigration USSC Apr. 24, 2020
Amended Opinion: Padilla Cuenca v. Barr
8 U.S.C. Section 1231(a)(5), which empowers an immigration officer to reinstate a prior removal order, permanently bars reopening of the prior removal order under 8 U.S.C. Section 1229a(c)(7).
Immigration 9th Apr. 15, 2020
Zerezghi v. USCIS
Board of Immigration Appeals violated due process by not disclosing that it relied on plaintiff's former spouse's rental application in making its marriage-fraud finding.
Immigration 9th Apr. 15, 2020
Aleman Gonzalez v. Barr
District court correctly determined that plaintiffs were likely to succeed on their claim that 8 U.S.C. Section 1231(a)(6) requires government to provide plaintiffs with individualized bond hearing.
Immigration 9th Apr. 8, 2020
Flores Tejada v. Godfrey
Government is not required to provide immigration detainees with additional bond hearings every six-months following their initial hearing.
Immigration 9th Apr. 8, 2020
Peters v. Barr
Regulation 8 C.F.R. Section 1245.1(d)(2) is invalid to the extent it excludes reasonable reliance on the assistance of counsel from 8 U.S.C. Section 1255(c)(2).
Immigration 9th Apr. 3, 2020
Padilla v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Noncitizens who were detained after entering United States were likely to prevail on their due process claim.
Immigration 9th Mar. 30, 2020
Guerrero-Lasprilla v. Barr
INA's Limited Review Provision's phrase 'questions of law' includes the application of legal standard to undisputed or established facts.
Immigration USSC Mar. 24, 2020
Amended Opinion: Lopez-Angel v. Barr
Permanent resident who was deported allowed to proceed with deportation appeal because he was involuntarily removed from the United States.
Immigration 9th Mar. 18, 2020
Innovation Law Lab v. Wolf
Migrant Protection Protocols, under which non-Mexican asylum seekers who present themselves at southern border of US are required to wait in Mexico while asylum applications are adjudicated, conflicts with Immigration Nationality Act.
Immigration 9th Mar. 6, 2020