This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Lopez-Jacuinde v. Holder
‘Aggravated felony’ subjecting defendant to removal, includes illicit trafficking of controlled substance offense, and does not require use of firearm.
Immigration Apr. 13, 2010
Mutuku v. Holder
Immigration judge improperly finds that petitioner no longer had well-founded fear of returning to Kenya because conditions were less dangerous for Democratic Party members.
Immigration Apr. 12, 2010
Ramirez-Villalpando v. Holder
Alien who commits grand theft of property categorically commits aggravated felony, which subjects him to removal.
Immigration Apr. 12, 2010
Delgado-Ortiz v. Holder
‘Returning Mexicans from United States’ do not qualify as particular, narrow social group qualifying for asylum.
Immigration Apr. 8, 2010
Morales-Izquierdo v. Dept. of Homeland Security
Discretionary waiver cannot cure inadmissibility of alien who is barred from readmission based on prior removal.
Immigration Apr. 5, 2010
Padilla v. Kentucky
Counsel is constitutionally deficient by failing to advise client of deportation risk associated with plea.
Immigration Apr. 1, 2010
Guerrero-Silva v. Holder
Alien’s California conviction for giving or offering to give marijuana to minor over 14-years-old qualifies as removable offense.
Immigration Apr. 1, 2010
Ledezma-Galicia v. Holder
Alien convicted of sexually abusing 10-year-old girl before Nov. 18, 1988 is not removable as alien convicted of aggravated felony.
Immigration Mar. 30, 2010
Chawla v. Holder
Court accepts petitioner's testimony as credible where immigration judge failed to articulate legitimate basis to question credibility.
Immigration Mar. 29, 2010
Lee v. Holder
Petitioner's appeal fails because immigration judge does not have authority to decide application for U visa interim relief.
Immigration Mar. 25, 2010
Tamang v. Holder
Asylum claim is untimely where petitioner failed to show ineffectiveness of counsel led to justified delay.
Immigration Mar. 16, 2010
Tijani v. Holder
Credit card fraud in violation of California Penal Code Section 532a(1) constitutes crime of moral turpitude, which makes alien removable.
Immigration Mar. 11, 2010
Najmabadi v. Holder
Motion to reopen removal proceedings based on changed conditions in Iran is denied where petitioner failed to introduce previously unavailable, material evidence.
Immigration Mar. 9, 2010
Tampubolon v. Holder
BIA errs in failing to apply disfavored group analysis to Indonesian Christians where record showed that Christians in Indonesia are disfavored group.
Immigration Mar. 9, 2010
S-Yong v. Holder
Removal order reversed where immigration judge relied on alien's admissions to establish fact of previous conviction.
Immigration Mar. 9, 2010
U.S. v. Arias-Ordonez
Alien’s due process rights are violated when order to appear for removal proceedings falsely stated no administrative relief was available to him.
Immigration Mar. 8, 2010
Lanuza v. Holder
Court declines to review decision to pretermit applications for cancellation of removal under Section 203 of Nicaraguan and Central American Relief Act.
Immigration Mar. 7, 2010
Kazarian v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Alien cannot receive visa for ‘extraordinary ability’ when he provided two examples of extraordinary accomplishments, rather than statutory requirement of three.
Immigration Mar. 4, 2010
Rice v. Holder
Nonpermanent resident’s expunged state conviction for using or being under influence of controlled substance does not prohibit his seeking cancellation of removal.
Immigration Mar. 1, 2010
Alvarez-Reynaga v. Holder
California conviction for receipt of stolen vehicle constitutes aggravated felony, but does not qualify as crime involving moral turpitude.
Immigration Feb. 21, 2010
Kin v. Holder
Aliens are properly denied asylum relief when their testimony as to arrest in Cambodia conflicted with that of Cambodian senator.
Immigration Feb. 18, 2010
Zetino v. Holder
Court lacks jurisdiction to review discretionary decision of BIA without sufficiently meaningful standard to determine abuse of discretion.
Immigration Feb. 18, 2010
Nunez v. Holder
Indecent exposure is not necessarily crime of moral turpitude that would prohibit alien from applying for cancellation of removal.
Immigration Feb. 11, 2010
Aguilar-Ramos v. Holder
Under Convention Against Torture, BIA must consider country’s conditions in determining whether petitioner would be tortured if removed.
Immigration Feb. 5, 2010
Corona-Mendez v. Holder
Waiver of deportability for fraud under Immigration and Naturalization Act is unavailable for person who is inadmissible on additional grounds.
Immigration Feb. 4, 2010
Esquivel-Garcia v. Holder
Denial of application for cancellation of removal is improper where record did not identify controlled substance involved in petitioner's conviction.
Immigration Jan. 29, 2010
Kawashima v. Holder
BIA must determine type of evidence in determining loss before finding act of assisting in false tax returns is aggravated felony.
Immigration Jan. 28, 2010
Velasco-Cervantes v. Holder
Government material witnesses do not constitute particular social group for purposes of asylum.
Immigration Jan. 28, 2010
Anaya-Ortiz v. Holder
Alien’s drunk driving conviction is ‘particularly serious crime’ that prohibits withholding of his removal.
Immigration Jan. 26, 2010
Kucana v. Holder
Appeals Court has jurisdiction to review Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of alien’s motion to reopen removal proceedings.
Immigration Jan. 21, 2010