For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Sign up for Daily Journal emails
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Sidhu v. INS
Adverse credibility finding withstands appellate review where applicant's credibility is questioned and applicant fails to produce corroborating evidence. 		Immigration Sep. 27, 2000
U.S. v. Armenta-Castro
Unusually vigorous prosecution for re-entering country after deportation does not justify departing downward from sentencing guidelines. 		Immigration Sep. 20, 2000
Zahedi v. INS
Refugee facing persecution in home country for distribution of political literature is eligible for asylum. 		Immigration Sep. 13, 2000
Chanchavac v. INS
Alien is entitled to asylum based on evidence of pervasive violence against alien by homeland military forces. 		Immigration Sep. 11, 2000
United States v. Garza-Sanchez
Immigration Judge does not have duty to advise respondent of potential constitutional challenges to immigration laws. 		Immigration Aug. 31, 2000
Pichardo v. INS
Alien must have intent to engage in drug trade before being deported for drug trafficking. 		Immigration Aug. 31, 2000
Navas v. INS
Murders of family members for political reasons establishes statutory eligibility for asylum when persecutors know of petitioner's similar political activities. 		Immigration Aug. 31, 2000
Hernandez-Montiel v. INS
Gay man who dresses as woman is granted asylum because he has well-founded fear of persecution in Mexico. 		Immigration Aug. 31, 2000
Barapind v. Reno
Board of Immigration Appeals may hold alien's asylum in abeyance pending completion of extradition proceedings. 		Immigration Aug. 31, 2000
Garcia v. INS
Personal service of notice of hearing on alien's counsel constitutes adequate notice of deportation. 		Immigration Aug. 29, 2000
Ladha v. INS
BIA cannot require corroborative evidence to support credible testimony of aliens at asylum hearing. 		Immigration Aug. 25, 2000
Alberto-Gonzalez v. INS
Alien sentenced to 79 days imprisonment for burglary conviction not deportable as aggravated felon under Immigration and Naturalization Act. 		Immigration Aug. 25, 2000
Ye v. INS
Under immigration laws, vehicular burglary not aggravated felony for purposes of removal. 		Immigration Aug. 25, 2000
Ladha v. INS
BIA cannot require corroborative evidence to support credible testimony of aliens at asylum hearing. 		Immigration Aug. 24, 2000
Chand v. INS
Alien persecuted on protected ground who faces significant continuing violence in home country in years after coup is eligible for asylum. 		Immigration Aug. 15, 2000
Jara v. INS
Order 		Immigration Aug. 15, 2000
U.S. v. Olafson
Court may admit hearsay statement and isn't required to allow phone depositions even though it would've avoided safety and administrative concerns. 		Immigration Aug. 5, 2000
Belayneh v. INS
Political view and activities of asylum applicant's former spouse are insufficient to support claim of well-founded fear of persecution. 		Immigration Aug. 5, 2000
Rivera-Moreno v. INS
Guerrilla retaliation against nurse because of her refusal to provide medical care does not qualify her for asylum or withholding of deportation. 		Immigration Aug. 5, 2000
Ontiveros-Lopez v. INS
Denying motion to reopen deportation proceedings without considering explanation of failure to submit supporting documents is abuse of discretion. 		Immigration Aug. 5, 2000
Singh v. INS
BIA may not rely on previously unannounced evidentiary standard to deny motion to reopen in absentia deportation proceeding. 		Immigration Aug. 5, 2000
Beltran-Tirado v. INS
Use of false Social Security number to further otherwise legal behavior is not crime of 'moral turpitude' under Immigration and Nationality Act. 		Immigration Aug. 5, 2000
Castillo-Perez v. INS
Alien entitled to relief from deportation is not preclued from applying for it by failing to meet formal administrative pleading and proof requirements. 		Immigration Aug. 5, 2000
Avetova-Elisseva v. INS
In asylum proceedings, well-founded fear of persecution, if supported by substantial evidence, may justify granting asylum or withholding of deportation. 		Immigration Aug. 5, 2000
United States v. Pacheco-Medina
Evidence of entry is required to support conviction for federal crime of being found in United States following deportation. 		Immigration Aug. 5, 2000
Sulit v. Schiltgen
Immigration and Naturalization Services' failure to follow its own procedural rules for rescinding an individual's adjustment of status does not preclude deportation. 		Immigration Aug. 5, 2000
Maini v. INS
Asylum seekers from interfaith family prove past persecution on account of religion even though persecutors are from multi-religious political party. 		Immigration Aug. 5, 2000
Escobar-Grijalva v. INS
Failure to allow alien to select her own counsel during asylum hearing violates due process. 		Immigration Aug. 5, 2000
Avetova-Elisseva v. INS
In asylum proceedings, well-founded fear of persecution, if supported by substantial evidence, may justify granting asylum or withholding of deportation. 		Immigration Aug. 5, 2000
Andres Flores-Miramontes v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Federal district courts have habeas corpus jurisdiction to consider challenges to removal orders brought by aliens. 		Immigration Aug. 4, 2000
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.