Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S267746
|
Allied Premier Ins. v. United Financial Casualty Co.
An uncancelled certificate of insurance that remains on file with the DMV does not cause the corresponding insurance policy to remain in effect in perpetuity. |
Insurance |
|
C. Corrigan | Jul. 25, 2023 |
A163848
|
Rosenberg-Wohl v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.
Plaintiff's Unfair Competition Law claim was time barred by the one-year limitation provision in her homeowner insurance policy because the gravamen of her claim arose out of the parties' contractual relationship. |
Insurance |
|
J. Richman | Jul. 13, 2023 |
A162893
|
Wong v. Stillwater Insurance Co.
Married couple was not covered for "direct physical loss" by their insurance policy since there was no direct evidence that their stored embryos had gone through a demonstrable physical alteration. |
Insurance |
|
J. Richman | Jul. 5, 2023 |
A166049
|
Bennett v. Ohio National Life Assurance Corp.
Statutes of limitation for insured's breach of contract and covenant of good faith claims against insurance company did not begin to run until the company stopped making disability payments. |
Insurance |
|
V. Rodriguez | Jun. 21, 2023 |
B314780
|
Dua v. Stillwater Insurance Company
Because dog bite lawsuit against insured was potentially covered, insurance company was required to investigate and negate all facts leading to coverage before denying coverage. |
Insurance |
|
E. Lui | May 8, 2023 |
B313518
|
Starlight Cinemas, Inc. v. Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company
Business interruption policy that covered physical loss and damages precluded coverage for losses resulting from government-ordered suspension of operations during COVID-19 pandemic. |
Insurance |
|
G. Feuer | May 3, 2023 |
B320834
|
Santa Ynez Band of Chumash v. Lexington Insurance Co.
Summary judgment for insurer on property damage claim was appropriate where insured provided no evidence of what specific covered property had been damaged. |
Insurance |
|
A. Gilbert | May 1, 2023 |
G061040
|
Coast Restaurant Group, Inc. v. AmGUARD Insurance Company
Although government shutdown order due to COVID-19 caused direct physical loss of property, the loss was excluded from policy's coverage under other exclusions. |
Insurance |
|
T. Delaney | Apr. 11, 2023 |
H047394
|
Santa Clara Valley Water Dist. v. Century Indemnity Co.
Water district's act of unilaterally agreeing to Consent Decree in regards to mercury contamination claim barred it from seeking indemnification under third-party insurance contract's No Voluntary Payment provision. |
Insurance |
|
P. Bamattre-Manoukian | Apr. 3, 2023 |
G060532
|
California Capital Insurance Co. v. Employers Compensation Insurance Co.
Employer's workers' compensation insurer was not liable for equitable compensation because its policy did not cover the same bodily injury risk as employer's general liability insurer's policy. |
Insurance |
|
T. Goethals | Mar. 22, 2023 |
B312459
|
State of California ex. rel. Sills v. Gharib-Danesh
Limitations period was stayed for the 962 days the insurance fraud complaint was under seal while under agency investigation because plaintiff could not take any litigative action during this time. |
Insurance |
|
G. Weingart | Feb. 28, 2023 |
D079927
|
Best Rest Motel, Inc. v. Sequoia Insurance Co.
No insurance coverage for hotel's lost business income where the evidence indicated the loss was not directly caused by physical loss or damage caused by COVID-19. |
Insurance |
|
W. Dato | Feb. 27, 2023 |
A162709
|
Modification: John's Grill v. Hartford Financial Services Group
Insurance policy's limited coverage for viruses was so broadly written as to make coverage for any virus illusory. |
Insurance |
|
Jan. 25, 2023 | |
B302426
|
State of California v. Encino Hospital Medical Center
Hospital's general acute care license was sufficient and a separate chemical dependency license was unnecessary to bill insurers for detox services. |
Insurance |
|
V. Chaney | Jan. 24, 2023 |
B313907
|
Shusha, Inc. v. Century-National Insurance Co.
Sustaining demurrer was not appropriate where complaint alleged that the COVID-19 virus adhered to and physically changed surfaces in insured's restaurant into fomities. |
Insurance |
|
G. Feuer | Jan. 9, 2023 |
C093414
|
LaBarbera v. Security National Insurance Company
Indemnitee of insured construction company was not a third-party beneficiary of insurance policy's indemnitee defense clause and was thus not entitled to recover expenses incurred in underlying personal injury suit against both parties. |
Insurance |
|
E. Duarte | Dec. 30, 2022 |
A162709
|
John's Grill v. Hartford Financial Services Group
Insurance policy's limited coverage for viruses was so broadly written as to make coverage for any virus illusory. |
Insurance |
|
J. Streeter | Dec. 29, 2022 |
D079265
|
Olson v. La Jolla Neurological Associates
Neurosurgeon and his professional corporation were not liable as "debt collectors" under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act for hiring a third-party billing service to collect medical payments. |
Insurance |
|
M. Buchanan | Nov. 25, 2022 |
21-55465
|
Collier v. Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
Adopting rationale for denying disability claim that was not presented to the claimant during the administrative process during de novo review was error that undermined ERISA protections. |
Insurance |
|
R. Paez | Nov. 22, 2022 |
G060210
|
Cover Right Roofing, Inc. v. State Compensation Insurance Fund
Workers' compensation insurer was not obligated to provide notice to insured employer of higher base rate resulting from employer's change of governing classification. |
Insurance |
|
E. Moore | Nov. 21, 2022 |
S253593
|
Yahoo Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, PA
Violating a person's right to privacy may fall under general commercial liability insurance policy containing ambiguous provisions. |
Insurance |
|
M. Jenkins | Nov. 18, 2022 |
B304970
|
Randle v. Farmers New World Life Insurance Co.
Since insurance policy's requirements for changing ownership do not control over the provisions of a contract of which the insurer has notice, summary judgment was improper where dispute existed over insurance company's knowledge. |
Insurance |
|
E. Grimes | Nov. 9, 2022 |
20-35890
|
Bliss Sequoia Insurance & Risk Advisors Inc. v. Allied Property & Casualty Insurance Co.
Under Oregon law, the phrase "because of bodily injury" in insurance policy included only damages reasonably or foreseeably resulting from bodily injury, not just any that may arise in lawsuits connected to someone's injury. |
Insurance |
|
E. Miller | Oct. 28, 2022 |
A163300
|
Apple Annie, LLC v. Oregon Mutual Ins. Co.
Restaurants' business interruption claim failed because mere loss of use of physical property to generate business income, without physical impact on the property, did not give rise to insurance coverage for direct physical loss. |
Insurance |
|
J. Richman | Sep. 7, 2022 |
A163670
|
24th & Hoffman Investors, LLC v. Northfield Ins. Co.
Insurer was not obliged to defend insured against tenants' lawsuit because tenants' claims were excluded under policy's provision excluding liability for violations of insured's duty of habitability. |
Insurance |
|
A. Tucher | Sep. 1, 2022 |
20-56315
|
Mull v. Motion Picture Industry Health Plan
ERISA did not prevent a plan fiduciary from implementing a self-help remedy under the terms of a health care plan since ERISA merely excluded other unauthorized causes of action. |
Insurance |
|
R. Clifton | Jul. 26, 2022 |
A161949
|
Thompson v. Crestbrook Insurance Company
Issue preclusion applied to subsequent litigation against different insurers where the prior litigation was based on the same underlying facts and concerned an identical issue of policy coverage. |
Insurance |
|
S. Pollak | Jul. 18, 2022 |
B316501
|
Marina Pacific Hotel and Suites, LLC v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.
Insurance policy that covered "direct physical loss or damage" to properties may have covered COVID-19 damages since plaintiffs alleged a distinct physical alteration of the property caused by the virus. |
Insurance |
|
D. Perluss | Jul. 14, 2022 |
C090436
|
Williams v. National Western Life Insurance Co.
Insurer was liable for agent's misconduct since an agent submitting a life insurance policy is the insurer's agent under Insurance Code Section 1704.5, even when the agent violates restrictions on his authority. |
Insurance |
|
V. Raye | May 11, 2022 |
B311310
|
Ghukasian v. Aegis Security Insurance Company
Policyholder's mistake regarding property lines did not make her renovation damage to neighbor's property an accident for the purposes of coverage. |
Insurance |
|
B. Currey | May 6, 2022 |