Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C098871
|
People v. I.B.
Statute's differing sex offender registration requirements for minors already in the custody of the juvenile justice system and those committed after the system's realignment did not violate equal protection. |
Juveniles |
|
S. Mesiwala | Aug. 30, 2024 |
A169823
|
T.M. v. Superior Court (People)
Where minor's counsel declared doubt as to minor's competency, psychotherapist-patient privilege did not bar disclosure of minor's mental health records to court-appointed expert in competency proceeding. |
Juveniles |
|
D. Chou | Aug. 29, 2024 |
A166195
|
In re Brandon H.
Juvenile wardship defendant was not entitled to a sealed and dismissed petition based on his completion of probation for an unrelated offense contained within another petition. |
Juveniles |
|
I. Petrou | Aug. 7, 2024 |
C099085
|
In re J.M.
Minor originally directly charged as an adult was entitled to retroactive application of ameliorative changes in the law that made it more difficult to transfer cases to adult criminal court. |
Juveniles |
|
P. Krause | Jul. 15, 2024 |
A168834
|
In re K.M.
Record provided insufficient evidence to support juvenile court's finding that 13-year-old student understood the wrongfulness of bringing a knife to school. |
Juveniles |
|
V. Rodriguez | Jun. 24, 2024 |
B329999M
|
Modification: In re A.M.
Conviction as adult for crime committed at 14 years old was nonfinal after conditional reversal, entitling defendant to benefit from laws barring transfer of such cases to adult criminal court. |
Criminal Law and Procedure, Juveniles |
|
H. Baltodano | Jun. 19, 2024 |
B326712
|
In re Jose R.
Juvenile court did not err in applying minor's precommitment custody credits to the maximum term of confinement rather than the maximum custodial term. |
Juveniles |
|
G. Feuer | Jun. 14, 2024 |
B329999
|
In re A.M.
Conviction as adult for crime committed at 14 years old was nonfinal after conditional reversal, entitling defendant to benefit from laws barring transfer of such cases to adult criminal court. |
Criminal Law and Procedure, Juveniles |
|
H. Baltodano | Jun. 3, 2024 |
A168282
|
In re Taylor C.
Respondent was statutorily ineligible for sealing of juvenile records because of an offense requiring sex offender registration even though juvenile court dismissed his wardship petitions in the interests of justice. |
Juveniles |
|
I. Petrou | Apr. 18, 2024 |
E082250
|
Modification: In re Miguel R.
In examining the factors to determine a minor's amenability to rehabilitation, no single factor is statutorily required to be given greater weight. |
Juveniles |
|
F. Menetrez | Mar. 8, 2024 |
C099115
|
In re J.S.
Ward of the court has "satisfactorily completed" probation when there are no new findings of wardship involving moral turpitude or felony convictions during probation. |
Juveniles |
|
E. Duarte | Mar. 7, 2024 |
E082250
|
In re Miguel R.
In examining the factors to determine a minor's amenability to rehabilitation, no single factor is statutorily required to be given greater weight. |
Juveniles |
|
F. Menetrez | Mar. 4, 2024 |
A166408
|
In re M.B.
In disagreement with earlier Court of Appeal precedent, a juvenile court has jurisdiction to modify a commitment order after the term of confinement begins. |
Juveniles |
|
J. Streeter | Feb. 2, 2024 |
C098376
|
In re K.B.
Convictions must be for a felony offense or a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude to disqualify a minor from automatic dismissal of their juvenile justice petition. |
Juveniles |
|
S. Boulware Eurie | Jan. 31, 2024 |
A166850
|
Modification: In re Tony R.
Juvenile ward who had been substantially complying with his rehabilitation plan was not presumptively entitled to a six-month reduction in his baseline term of confinement. |
Juveniles |
|
T. Stewart | Jan. 30, 2024 |
A166850
|
In re Tony R.
Juvenile ward who had been substantially complying with his rehabilitation plan was not presumptively entitled to a six-month reduction in his baseline term of confinement. |
Juveniles |
|
T. Stewart | Jan. 2, 2024 |
A167385
|
In re K.B.
Department of Health and Social Services failed to use "due diligence" to locate and contact the adult relatives of parents whose children were removed from parental custody. |
Juveniles |
|
M. Markman | Dec. 1, 2023 |
F085850
|
In re Jerry R.
Disagreeing with other appellate courts, a welfare department must inquire into whether a child placed into protective custody is an Indian child. |
Juveniles |
|
K. Meehan | Sep. 13, 2023 |
E079972
|
In re: Andres R.
Department of Public Social Services' duty to ask extended family members about child's Indian status applies when the child is placed into "temporary custody," not if placed into "protective custody." |
Juveniles |
|
Aug. 25, 2023 | |
A165499
|
In re A.B.
Welfare and Institutions Code Section 781 does not bar supplemental or amended petitions to seal juvenile records. |
Juveniles |
|
G. Burns | Aug. 7, 2023 |
E080284
|
In re J.P.
Welfare and Institutions Code Section 782(a)(1) allows the juvenile court to dismiss any part of a petition against a ward and does not require dismissal of the entire petition. |
Juveniles |
|
M. Raphael | Aug. 7, 2023 |
S270907
|
In re F.M.
Juvenile court failed to comply with its express declaration requirement for wobbler allegations since it did not discuss its discretion in the hearing transcript. |
Juveniles |
|
G. Liu | May 5, 2023 |
B321655
|
Modification: K.R. v. Superior Court (People)
Although Welfare & Institutions Code Section 709 establishes a maximum period of one year of remediation, the juvenile court's jurisdiction continued for a reasonable period afterward to resolve the minor's competency. |
Juveniles |
|
G. Weingart | Apr. 27, 2023 |
E079346
|
In re T.A.
Transfer of minor from juvenile court back to court of criminal jurisdiction was proper where it was not plausible that the juvenile court's decision would have been any different had it applied the newly applicable standard of proof. |
Juveniles |
|
M. Raphael | Apr. 13, 2023 |
C097055
|
In re S.S.
It was reasonably probable the juvenile court would not have ordered minor's transfer to a court of criminal jurisdiction under the current version of Welfare and Institutions Code Section 707. |
Juveniles |
|
S. McAdam | Apr. 3, 2023 |
B321655
|
K.R. v. Superior Court (People)
Although Welfare & Institutions Code Section 709 establishes a maximum period of one year of remediation, the juvenile court's jurisdiction continued for a reasonable period afterward to resolve the minor's competency. |
Juveniles |
|
G. Weingart | Apr. 3, 2023 |
B319738
|
In re E.P.
Prosecution was entitled to new fitness hearing to determine if juvenile court had jurisdiction over gang member's case based on the amended evidentiary standard. |
Juveniles |
|
A. Gilbert | Mar. 20, 2023 |
B323404
|
M.E. v. Superior Court (People)
Deferred entry of judgment was not appropriate where the Section 602 petition was not filed until after the alleged offender was 25 years old. |
Juveniles |
|
K. Yegan | Mar. 7, 2023 |
D079942
|
In re Hunter W.
Juvenile was not entitled to retroactive, ameliorative effect of amended statute because his dispositional order could no longer be directly reviewed. |
Juveniles |
|
J. McConnell | Feb. 16, 2023 |
H050341
|
In re M.G.
Welfare and Institutions Code Section 5276 required mental disorder detention evidentiary hearing to be held within two days regardless of good cause for continuance. |
Juveniles |
|
A. Grover | Dec. 23, 2022 |