Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
20-71480
|
National Labor Relations Board v. Nexstar Broadcasting Inc.
Collective bargaining agreement must explicitly provide for survival of expired contract rights. |
Labor Law |
|
A. Hurwitz | Jul. 13, 2021 |
20-35037
|
Columbia Export Terminal v. International Longshore and Warehouse Union
Section 301 of Labor Management Relations Act precluded adjudication of RICO claims because resolution of claims required interpretation of underlying collective bargaining agreement, which provided for arbitration. |
Labor Law |
|
R. Clifton | Jun. 29, 2021 |
D077133
|
Usher v. White
Company owner's summary judgment motion was properly granted because she was not personally involved in company's decision to classify plaintiffs as independent contractors. |
Labor Law |
|
P. Benke | Jun. 1, 2021 |
19-16184
|
Magadia v. Wal-Mart Associates
Plaintiff lacked Article III standing to seek Private Attorneys General Act claim for meal-break violations because he was uninjured party suing on behalf of other employees. |
Labor Law |
|
P. Bumatay | Jun. 1, 2021 |
D076601
|
Department of Industrial Relations v. Built Pacific, Inc.
Civil Code Section 1671(b) addresses validity of liquidated damages provisions in contracts, but does not apply to Civil Wage Penalty Assessments. |
Labor Law |
|
T. Do | Apr. 8, 2021 |
19-16863
|
Garcia v. Service Employees International Union
Plaintiff's claims sought to vindicate rights created solely by Labor Management Relations Act Section 301 labor contracts and were thus preempted. |
Labor Law |
|
J. Nguyen | Apr. 6, 2021 |
B296566
|
Parada v. East Coast Transport Inc.
'Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court' applies retroactively; thus, because trial court ruled it did not apply retroactively, judgment was reversed and remanded. |
Labor Law |
|
E. Lui | Apr. 5, 2021 |
B297425
|
Jones v. Quality Coast
Plaintiff was not entitled to protection under Displaced Janitor Opportunity Act because he was supervisory employee at air traffic control facility. |
Labor Law |
|
L. Baker | Mar. 25, 2021 |
A153072
|
Sargent v. Bd. of Trustees of the California State Univ.
A viable claim under the Private Attorneys General Act can be asserted against defendant, but only when the statutes upon which the claims are premised themselves provide for penalties. |
Labor Law |
|
J. Humes | Mar. 9, 2021 |
19-15382
|
Amended Opinion: Bernstein v. Virgin America
Summary judgment to plaintiffs on their claims for minimum wage and payment for all hours worked was reversed because defendant's compensation scheme based on block time did not violate California law. |
Labor Law |
|
M. Smith | Mar. 9, 2021 |
S253677
|
Donohue v. AMN Services, LLC
Defendant improperly rounded time records for meal periods using timekeeping system, and failed to pay premium wages for noncompliant meal periods. |
Labor Law |
|
G. Liu | Feb. 26, 2021 |
19-15382
|
Bernstein v. Virgin America
Summary judgment to plaintiffs on their claims for minimum wage and payment for all hours worked was reversed because defendant's compensation scheme based on block time did not violate California law. |
Labor Law |
|
M. Smith | Feb. 24, 2021 |
19-55784
|
Clarke v. AMN Services
Defendant failed to demonstrate that its per diem benefits may be excluded from Fair Labor Standards Act regular rate of pay under Section 207(e)(2). |
Labor Law |
|
M. Berzon | Feb. 9, 2021 |
16-16415
|
Ward v. United Airlines
Applying Labor Code Section 226 in accordance with test set forth by California Supreme Court under 'Ward v. United Airlines, Inc.' does not violate dormant Commerce Clause. |
Labor Law |
|
P. Watford | Feb. 3, 2021 |
C085463
|
Rojas-Cifuentes v. Superior Court (American Modular Systems)
Trial court erred in granting respondent's motion for summary adjudication because petitioner's Private Attorneys General Act notice supplied sufficient facts and theories to support his claims. |
Labor Law |
|
C. Blease | Dec. 23, 2020 |
G057740
|
Semprini v. Wedbush Securities, Inc.
Defendant's compensation plan based solely on commissions, with recoverable advances on future commissions, did not satisfy salary basis test; thus, administrative exemption did not apply. |
Labor Law |
|
T. Goethals | Nov. 11, 2020 |
B299765
|
Miles v. City of Los Angeles
Wage Order No. 9 only applies to workers in transportation industry and sanitation workers do not become part of transportation industry simply because they transport waste. |
Labor Law |
|
V. Chaney | Oct. 30, 2020 |
A160096
|
Midwest Motor Supply Co. v. Superior Court (Finch)
Labor Code Section 925 unambiguously permits employees to void forum-selection clauses in contracts modified on or after January 1, 2017. |
Labor Law |
|
T. Brown | Oct. 30, 2020 |
15-17382
|
Amended Opinion: Frlekin v. Apple
Employees' time spent on employer's premises waiting for and undergoing required exit searches of packages, bags, or personal technology devices voluntarily brought to work for personal convenience was compensable as 'hours worked.' |
Labor Law |
|
C. Marshall | Oct. 30, 2020 |
A156985
|
Garcia-Brower v. Premier Automotive Imports of CA, LLC
Trial court's grant of nonsuit was improper because reasonable jury could conclude that defendant misused employee's dismissed conviction to terminate her in violation of Labor Code Section 432.7. |
Labor Law |
|
G. Sanchez | Oct. 19, 2020 |
D076569
|
Provost v. YourMechanic, Inc.
Threshold issues involving whether plaintiff is an 'aggrieved employee' for purposes of representative PAGA-only action cannot be split into individual arbitrable and representative nonarbitrable components. |
Labor Law |
|
P. Benke | Oct. 19, 2020 |
19-70297
|
International Longshore and Warehouse Union v. National Labor Relations Board
National Labor Relations Board erred in deeming its Section 10(k) of the National Labor Relations Act decision 'dispositive' of petitioner's work preservation defense. |
Labor Law |
|
M. Hawkins | Oct. 15, 2020 |
G057371
|
Santos v. Crenshaw Manufacturing, Inc.
'Power press exception' to principle of workers' compensation exclusivity applied because machine's instruction manual required use of 'adequate guards,' which went unheeded by present user. |
Labor Law |
|
W. Bedsworth | Sep. 29, 2020 |
15-17382
|
Frlekin v. Apple
Employees' time spent on employer's premises waiting for and undergoing required exit searches of packages, bags, or personal technology devices voluntarily brought to work for personal convenience was compensable as 'hours worked.' |
Labor Law |
|
C. Marshall | Sep. 3, 2020 |
B288104
|
Li v. Dept. of Industrial Relations
Labor Code Section 1197.1's new bond requirement did not constitute retroactive application of statute because all that changed was the addition of procedural requirement. |
Labor Law |
|
D. Perluss | Aug. 21, 2020 |
18-73097
|
Delta Sandblasting v. National Labor Relations Board
Labor Management Relations Act Section 302's written agreement requirement was satisfied by parties' collective bargaining agreement. |
Labor Law |
|
M. Smith | Aug. 12, 2020 |
F077033
|
Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Bd.
Good faith bargaining duty extends, at minimum, to negotiation sessions held outside mediator's presence during Mandatory Mediation and Conciliation process. |
Labor Law |
|
T. DeSantos | Jul. 17, 2020 |
B291377
|
Mattei v. Corporate Management Solutions
Trial court erred in granting summary judgment to defendant because defendant failed to demonstrate it was not an employer within meaning of Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Order No. 12-2001. |
Labor Law |
|
D. Perluss | Jul. 16, 2020 |
A157336
|
David v. Queen of the Valley Medical Center
Defendant's meal and rest period policies complied with California law; thus, judgment was affirmed. |
Labor Law |
|
B. Jones | Jul. 1, 2020 |
S248726
|
Oman v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
Delta Air Lines satisfied minimum wage law because the compensation owed to flight attendants under their duty period credit formula exceeded minimum wage. |
Labor Law |
|
L. Kruger | Jun. 30, 2020 |