Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
04-631
|
Wagnon v. Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation
Kansas' nondiscriminatory motor fuel tax imposed on off-reservation transactions between non-Indians is valid and does not threaten tribe's sovereignty. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Dec. 12, 2005 | |
03-17207
|
Lewis v. Norton
Federal court lacks jurisdiction to determine whether plaintiffs are members of Indian tribe and entitled to share of casino revenue. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Dec. 11, 2005 | |
03-35911
|
Wilbur v. Locke
Action between government and individual tribe members should be dismissed in absence of joinder of tribe as necessary party. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Dec. 6, 2005 | |
01-17489
|
Means v. Navajo Nation
Law allowing Indian tribe to prosecute enrolled member of another tribe does not violate equal protection guarantees. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Nov. 15, 2005 | |
B177126
|
Alexis H., a Minor
Notice requirements of Indian Child Welfare Act do not apply to proceedings contemplating only family reunification services. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Nov. 11, 2005 | |
E036474
|
Lamere v. Superior Court (Salinas)
Trial court lacks jurisdiction to hear dispute regarding enrollment of members in Pechanga Band Indian tribe. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Nov. 2, 2005 | |
03-16940
|
Hoopa Valley Indian Tribe v. Ryan
River's restoration program does not fall within mandatory contracting provisions of Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Oct. 5, 2005 | |
04-15477
|
Doe v. Mann
California court has jurisdiction to terminate parental rights of mother of Native American child. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Oct. 5, 2005 | |
A107547
|
Worthington v. City Council of the City of Rohnert Park
City's approval of Indian gaming construction project is not subject to referendum process. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Oct. 4, 2005 | |
01-35028
|
Skokomish Indian Tribe v. United States
Indian tribe's lawsuit against city and utility for hydroelectric project that flooded tribal lands was properly dismissed. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Aug. 29, 2005 | |
03-30171
|
U.S. v. Bruce
Defendant who allegedly assaulted Indian child may have been charged under wrong statute because of own Indian status. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Aug. 9, 2005 | |
03-35145
|
United States v. State of Washington
District court abused its discretion in ruling federal recognition of tribe had no impact on its exercise of treaty fishing rights. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Aug. 8, 2005 | |
02-17048
|
Ford Motor Co. v. Todecheene
Tribal court cannot exercise jurisdiction over products liability action arising from accident that occurred on tribal trust land. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Aug. 8, 2005 | |
B175163
|
In re Glorianna K.
Department of Children and Family Services must comply with Indian Child Welfare Act's notice requirements before seeking to terminate parental rights. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Aug. 8, 2005 | |
B175555
|
Brooke C., a Minor
Violation of Indian Child Welfare Act does not constitute jurisdictional error. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Aug. 3, 2005 | |
03-855
|
City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York
Oneida Indian Nation must pay property taxes on lands repurchased after having ceded those lands in 1800s. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Apr. 6, 2005 | |
02-1472
|
Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. Leavitt
Government's promises to pay certain contract support costs are legally binding. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Mar. 14, 2005 | |
03-10516
|
U.S. v. Anderson
State of California does not have exclusive jurisdiction over all crimes committed in Indian country within its borders. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Feb. 14, 2005 | |
03-35722
|
Boozer v. Wilder
Non-Indian must exhaust tribal court remedies under Indian Child Welfare Act when child resides within reservation. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Jan. 18, 2005 | |
02-56943
|
Cabazon Band of Mission Indians v. Smith
County's prohibition on display of emergency light bars on tribe's police vehicles is discriminatory. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Jan. 9, 2005 | |
03-30482
|
U.S. v. Smith
Federal criminal laws of nationwide applicability are enforceable against Native Americans on their land. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Oct. 21, 2004 | |
03-35306
|
Smith v. Salish Kootenai College
Tribal court cannot exercise jurisdiction over negligence and spoliation of evidence claims of non-member. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Oct. 5, 2004 | |
C045118
|
Ackerman v. Edwards
California court lacks jurisdiction over dispute between tribal members and tribe. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Sep. 27, 2004 | |
03-15272
|
Peabody Coal Company v. Navajo Nation
Federal court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over action seeking enforcement of arbitration award of federally-approved lease agreement with Navajo Nation. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Sep. 2, 2004 | |
D042955
|
S.M., a Minor
Judgment terminating parental rights is reversed for lack of proper notice to tribes under Indian Child Welfare Act. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Jul. 29, 2004 | |
D043166
|
Louis S., a Minor
Agency did not comply with notice provisions of Indian Child Welfare Act. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Jul. 28, 2004 | |
C043785
|
D.T., a Minor
Juvenile court failed to ensure compliance with notice provisions of Indian Child Welfare Act. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Jul. 12, 2004 | |
02-35994
|
Bonnichsen v. United States
Ancient human remains are not Indian within meaning of Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. |
Native American Affairs |
|
May 7, 2004 | |
01-35921
|
Chickaloon-Moose Creek Native Association Inc. v. Norton
Evidence supported plain language of agreement as compromise measure that preserved some of Alaskan villages' land selections. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Apr. 26, 2004 | |
02-3448
|
Doe v. Mann
Court determined that it had proper jurisdiction over child custody case pursuant to the Indian Child Welfare Act. |
Native American Affairs |
|
Feb. 11, 2004 |