Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
H044960
|
Bruno v. Hopkins
Trial court has jurisdiction to award attorneys' fees against party who sought to remove the trustee of a trust in bad faith. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
M. Greenwood | Jun. 16, 2022 |
B311507
|
Welch v. Welch
Surviving spouse's right to inherit from deceased spouse was waived when the circumstances evinced that the marital separation agreement was a complete property settlement. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
C. Moor | Jun. 2, 2022 |
B309376
|
Autonomous Region of Narcotics Anonymous v. Narcotics Anonymous World Services Inc.
Probate Code Section 15800 did not provide standing for a regional delegate to sue trustee when the regional delegate is one of many groups that collectively constituted the trust's settlor. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
J. Wiley | Apr. 27, 2022 |
B306918
|
Modification: Chui v. Chui
A settlement agreement was not unconscionable because appellant's theory of "winning by losing at trial" was based on a misconception of law. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
F. Rothschild | Mar. 30, 2022 |
B306918
|
Chui v. Chui
A settlement agreement was not unconscionable because appellant's theory of "winning by losing at trial" was based on a misconception of law. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
F. Rothschild | Mar. 7, 2022 |
A162222
|
Balistreri v. Balistreri
Under Probate Code Section 15402, when a trust specifies a method of amendment, that method must be followed for the amendment to be effective. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
V. Rodriguez | Feb. 28, 2022 |
E075232
|
Ring v. Harmon
An estate's personal representative has standing to bring a financial elder abuse claim in her individual capacity. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
M. Raphael | Dec. 16, 2021 |
D078049
|
Haggerty v. Thornton
Amendment to a trust was valid because the trust did not distinguish between revocation and modification, did not reject the general rule, and was not explicitly exclusive. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
P. Guerrero | Sep. 20, 2021 |
F080403
|
Pearce v. Briggs
Because a will's operative language did not reflect an unequivocal intent to irrevocably sever a joint tenancy, the joint tenancy interest was not severed. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
M. Smith | Sep. 2, 2021 |
C087730
|
Estate of Wall
Evidence Code Section 662 prevails over Family Code Section 760 when determining character of decedent's real property in probate matter. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
H. Hull | Aug. 26, 2021 |
B301382
|
Amended Opinion: Breslin v. Breslin
Defendants forfeited their interest in settlement between appearing beneficiaries when defendants failed to participate in mediation ordered by probate court. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
A. Gilbert | Jul. 8, 2021 |
D077561
|
Dunlap v. Mayer
Probate court abused its discretion when it dismissed petition at case management conference, without evidentiary hearing to resolve contested facts. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
P. Benke | Apr. 27, 2021 |
B301382
|
Amended Opinion: Breslin v. Breslin
Defendants forfeited their interest in settlement between appearing beneficiaries when defendants failed to participate in mediation ordered by probate court. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
Apr. 7, 2021 | |
A157962
|
Eyford v. Nord
Trial court properly denied petition to invalidate appellants' grandmother's trust because evidence showed grandmother was lucid in period when she signed her trust. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
C. Fujisaki | Mar. 22, 2021 |
A151468
|
Keading v. Keading
Probate Code Section 859 authorizes double damages for elder financial abuse without requiring separate finding of bad faith. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
C. Fujisaki | Feb. 22, 2021 |
B301382
|
Breslin v. Breslin
Defendants forfeited their interest in settlement between appearing beneficiaries when defendants failed to participate in mediation ordered by probate court. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
A. Gilbert | Jan. 28, 2021 |
C084032
|
Modification: Capra v. Capra
Trial court erred by concluding that probate court had 'exclusive jurisdiction' under Probate Code Section 17000 over plaintiff's wrongful ownership claim. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
H. Hull | Jan. 20, 2021 |
C084032
|
Capra v. Capra
Trial court erred by concluding that probate court had 'exclusive jurisdiction' under Probate Code Section 17000 over plaintiff's wrongful ownership claim. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
H. Hull | Dec. 24, 2020 |
C089338
|
Modification: Gomez v. Smith
Trial court applied correct legal standard for mental capacity under Probate Code Sections 811 and 812. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
Oct. 20, 2020 | |
C089338
|
Gomez v. Smith
Trial court applied correct legal standard for mental capacity under Probate Code Sections 811 and 812. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
R. Robie | Sep. 24, 2020 |
B290526
|
Rallo v. O'Brian
Trustor was not prevented from expressing his intent to disinherit potential heirs living at the time--even if unknown to trustor--by including general disinheritance clause in his trust. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
A. Egerton | Aug. 5, 2020 |
B295609
|
Estate of Timothy W. Eimers
Where trust beneficiary creates will giving away his trust shares without specifically referring to power of appointment as required by trust, court may not amend will to include 'specific reference.' |
probate_and_trusts |
|
M. Stratton | May 19, 2020 |
G056951
|
Tubbs v. Berkowitz
Successor trustee's power of appointment enabled him to act in non-fiduciary capacity, thus permitting him to transfer trust assets to himself. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
R. Ikola | Apr. 9, 2020 |
B293127
|
Donkin v. Donkin
Trustees seeking instructions from probate proceedings in order to effectuate intent of trustor may represent themselves without engaging in unauthorized practice of law. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
F. Rothschild | Apr. 7, 2020 |
B294530
|
Wilkin v. Nelson
Substantial evidence supported probate court's decision to equitably reform pour-over will to provide for testamentary control and disposition of testator's separate property only. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
S. Perren | Mar. 2, 2020 |
A155742
|
Roth v. Jelley
When the rights of beneficiaries to a trust are inevitably affected, they are entitled to notice and are indispensable parties. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
M. Miller | Feb. 26, 2020 |
S251574
|
Barefoot v. Jennings
Probate Code Sections 17200 and 17202 grant standing to a petitioner who seeks to invalidate trust amendments procured through fraud, if the challenge would render the petitioner a trust beneficiary. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
M. Chin | Jan. 24, 2020 |
B292747
|
Sachs v. Sachs
Transferor's contemporaneous record which kept track of amounts he distributed to beneficiaries satisfied requirements of Probate Code Section 21135. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
M. Tangeman | Jan. 8, 2020 |
G055631
|
Modification: Placencia v. Strazicich
Probate court did not err by denying petitioner's right of survivorship to joint bank account because decedent left clear statements in his will that he did not want petitioner to have the right of survivorship. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
R. Ikola | Dec. 26, 2019 |
G055631
|
Placencia v. Strazicich
Probate court did not err by denying petitioner's right of survivorship to joint bank account because decedent left clear statements in his will that he did not want petitioner to have the right of survivorship. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
R. Ikola | Dec. 2, 2019 |