For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Sign up for Daily Journal emails
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
731 Market Street Owner, LLC v. City and County of San Francisco
Transfer of property subject to lease with remaining term of years was not a taxable 'change in ownership.' 		statutory_interpretation 1DCA/3 Jun. 22, 2020
In re Brownlee
Prisoners are not entitled to youth offender parole hearing if they are already eligible for parole under other applicable laws. 		statutory_interpretation 5DCA Jun. 18, 2020
Murray v. BEJ Minerals
Under Montana law, dinosaur fossils do not constitute 'minerals' for purpose of mineral reservation and thus, belong to surface estate. 		statutory_interpretation 9th Jun. 18, 2020
Trejo v. County of Los Angeles
Plain language of County's Civil Service Rules did not authorize Sheriff's Department's practice of extending probation by re-assigning deputies under investigation to administrative duty. 		statutory_interpretation 2DCA/1 Jun. 11, 2020
People v. Johns
Senate Bill 1437 addressed distinct areas of the law, which left Proposition 7 and Proposition 115 in the power of the Legislature to amend. 		statutory_interpretation 4DCA/2 Jun. 10, 2020
People v. Jessup
Attaching gang enhancement to marijuana-related felony conviction does not render that conviction ineligible for Proposition 64 redesignation. 		statutory_interpretation 2DCA/6 Jun. 10, 2020
Lomax v. Ortiz-Marquez
Prison Litigation Reform Act prohibits in forma pauperis litigation for prisoners with prior suits dismissed on specific grounds, with or without prejudice. 		statutory_interpretation USSC Jun. 9, 2020
Hernandez v. Dept. of Motor Vehicles
Under Vehicle Code Section 13365 DMV must receive express notification of violation of Misdemeanor Statute before suspending driver's licenses. 		statutory_interpretation 1DCA/5 Jun. 4, 2020
GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
Nothing in text of Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards conflicted with application of domestic law. 		statutory_interpretation USSC Jun. 2, 2020
People v. Prado
Legislature did not violate constitutional limitation in amending Penal Code Sections 188-89 when it passed Senate Bill 1437 because such sections are not initiative statutes. 		statutory_interpretation 4DCA/3 May 29, 2020
City of Chula Vista v. Sandoval
Passthrough payments have primacy under Health and Safety Code Section 34188 over residual Assembly Bill 8 pro rata shares. 		statutory_interpretation 3DCA May 29, 2020
National Lawyers Guild v. City of Hayward
City could not charge plaintiff for time spent deleting exempt data from video because that did not constitute data 'extraction' under California Public Records Act Section 6253.9(b)(2). 		statutory_interpretation CASC May 29, 2020
People v. Smith
Revocation of a Sexually Violent Predator's conditional release is indicative of public safety risks thus rendering him ineligible for unconditional discharge. 		statutory_interpretation 1DCA/5 May 28, 2020
People v. Bonilla-Bray
Under Assembly Bill 865 defendant should have been provided resentencing hearing in which court takes into account mitigating factors related to military service. 		statutory_interpretation 2DCA/3 May 26, 2020
Opati v. Republic of Sudan
Plaintiffs in federal causes of action under Section 28 U.S.C. 1605A(c) may seek punitive damages for preenactment conduct because Congress explicitly authorized it. 		statutory_interpretation USSC May 19, 2020
Modification: El Rovia Mobile Home Park, LLC v. City of El Monte
Cities are entitled broad discretion in selecting the base year under rent control. 		statutory_interpretation 2DCA/5 May 15, 2020
Empire Health Foundation v. Azar
Health and Human Services' rulemaking process for its 2005 rule, while not perfect, satisfied APA's notice-and-comment requirements but was substantively invalid. 		statutory_interpretation 9th May 6, 2020
In re A.N.
Fourth truancy report must be issued to attendance supervisor or school superintendent to establish juvenile court jurisdiction. 		statutory_interpretation CASC May 5, 2020
People v. Lopez
Penal Code Section 459.5(b) prohibits charging shoplifting and theft of same property even in the alternative. 		statutory_interpretation CASC May 1, 2020
El Rovia Mobile Home Park, LLC v. City of El Monte
Cities are entitled broad discretion in selecting the base year under rent control. 		statutory_interpretation 2DCA/5 Apr. 27, 2020
People v. Perez
A new appellate opinion is not newly discovered evidence as that term is used in Penal Code Section 1473.7(a)(2). 		statutory_interpretation 4DCA/2 Apr. 21, 2020
In re Facebook Inc. Internet Tracking Litigation
Because plaintiffs' data was not in electronic storage, plaintiffs' claims for relief under Stored Communications Act were insufficient. 		statutory_interpretation 9th Apr. 10, 2020
Babb v. Wilkie
A violation of ADEA Section 633a(a) does not require age to be a but-for cause of a personnel action. 		statutory_interpretation USSC Apr. 7, 2020
Early v. Becerra
Attorneys 'admitted to practice' are State Bar members regardless of their engagement in the 'actual' or 'active' practice of law. 		statutory_interpretation 3DCA Apr. 6, 2020
People v. Medeiros
Penal Code Section 12022.6. does not permit repealing enhancements; rather it permits review of the amount of loss, as part of enhancement. 		statutory_interpretation 1DCA/1 Mar. 30, 2020
People v. Mitchell
Application of Evidence Code Section 1360 is not limited based upon the specific offenses enumerated in Section 1360(c). 		statutory_interpretation 4DCA/2 Mar. 25, 2020
Uber Technologies Pricing Cases
Uber was exempt from Unfair Practices Act claim because California Public Utilities Commission had jurisdiction over it. 		statutory_interpretation 1DCA/1 Mar. 25, 2020
Citizens for Responsible etc. v. Department of Transportation
Streets and Highways Code Section 103 did not exempt Caltrans from California Environmental Quality Act's requirements. 		statutory_interpretation 4DCA/1 Mar. 25, 2020
Kahler v. Kansas
Due process did not require Kansas to adopt moral incapacity test because insanity defenses are state governance and no particular version is required. 		statutory_interpretation USSC Mar. 24, 2020
People v. Cruz
Senate Bill 1437 was constitutional and did not amend Proposition 7 because it neither added to nor took away from Proposition 7's initiatives. 		statutory_interpretation 4DCA/2 Mar. 20, 2020
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.