Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
19-50099
|
U.S. v. Velazquez
Prosecutor's misstatements of law during closing argument and court's failure to neutralize prejudice warranted reversal of defendant's conviction. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
R. Paez | Jun. 24, 2021 |
19-72290
|
Bogle v. Garland
Board of Immigration Appeals did not err in determining that circumstance-specific approach applies to personal-use exception to removability based on drug convictions. |
Immigration |
|
M. Bennett | Jun. 24, 2021 |
C091678
|
In re B.S.
De facto parents do not have standing to appeal juvenile court's order placing minor child with her maternal relatives. |
Juveniles |
|
A. Hoch | Jun. 23, 2021 |
A158854
|
Greenberg v. Digital Media Solutions, LLC
Plaintiffs were not precluded from filing action under Business and Professions Code Section 17529.5(a)(2) because they alleged defendant's marketing partners failed to identify themselves in email domain names. |
Cyber Law |
|
J. Humes | Jun. 23, 2021 |
B304841
|
Favila v. Pasquarella
Amending prior judgment to add judgment debtor on alter ego grounds was not barred by claim preclusion. |
Civil Procedure |
|
D. Perluss | Jun. 23, 2021 |
C089127
|
Westwood Homes, Inc. v. AGCPII Villa Salerno Member
Appellants were viewed as prevailing parties and entitled to attorney fees because trial court denied motion to amend judgment to add them as alter ego judgment debtors. |
Civil Procedure |
|
J. Renner | Jun. 23, 2021 |
D077905
|
In re Ontiveros
Inmate is not eligible for early parole consideration under Proposition 57 if inmate is convicted of violent felony, even if he was convicted of other nonviolent offenses. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
P. Guerrero | Jun. 23, 2021 |
20-15175
|
Dickinson v. Shinn
Habeas relief was properly denied because loss of more favorable standard of appellate review due to counsel's failure to object to jury instruction does not satisfy 'Strickland v. Washington's prejudice prong. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
B. Bade | Jun. 23, 2021 |
18-16700
|
Gonzalez v. Google
Plaintiff's claims that Google was directly and secondarily liable for ISIS's acts of international terrorism were barred pursuant to Section 230 of Communications Decency Act. |
Cyber Law |
|
M. Christen | Jun. 23, 2021 |
20-35333
|
Gibson v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 23, 2021 | ||
18-9639
|
Ash v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
19-5652
|
Bettcher v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
19-5325
|
Gomez v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
19-5763
|
Lara-Garcia v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
19-5908
|
Combs v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
19-6025
|
Segovia-Lopez v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
19-6186
|
Burris v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
19-6908
|
Olvera-Martinez v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
19-7684
|
Powell v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
20-5434
|
Bates v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
20-5584
|
Matthews v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
20-6130
|
Greer v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
20-6225
|
Lister v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
20-6459
|
Garrett v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
20-6539
|
Lopez-Rodriguez v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
20-6541
|
Pineda-Campuzano v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
20-6552
|
Arreola-Mendoza v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
20-7280
|
Vickers v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
19-6114
|
Anderson v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
19-6504
|
McGee v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 |