This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

REPLACEMENT COPY OF TUESDAY, AUGUST 19, 2025

Name Category Published
In re Rashad D.
Parent must appeal not only from jurisdiction finding and disposition order but also from orders terminating jurisdiction and modifying parent's prior custody status for appellate court to provide effective relief.
Dependency 2DCA/7 Apr. 21, 2021
Speier v. The Advantage Fund, LLC
Because arbitrator did not fail to make required disclosure, trial court did not err by confirming arbitration award.
Arbitration 4DCA/3 Apr. 21, 2021
In re Murray
Penal Code Section 3051 does not violate equal protection by affording juveniles sentenced to life without possibility of parole youth offender parole hearing but denying that hearing to youthful LWOP offenders.
statutory_interpretation 1DCA/2 Apr. 21, 2021
Modification: People v. Abelino
Person of ordinary prudence could have entertained reasonable suspicion that mayhem, battery, and assault were natural and probable consequences of target crime of riot.
Criminal Law and Procedure 1DCA/4 Apr. 21, 2021
City of Oakland v. Wells Fargo & Company
Order
9th Apr. 21, 2021
Golub v. Gigamon
'Omnicare' standards for pleading falsity of opinion apply to claims arising under Section 14(a) of Securities Exchange Act, as implemented by Securities Exchange Commission Rule 14a-9.
Securities 9th Apr. 21, 2021
Ironhawk Technologies v. Dropbox
There was genuine dispute of material fact as to likelihood of consumer confusion under reverse confusion theory of infringement.
Intellectual Property 9th Apr. 21, 2021
People v. Secrease
Prior felony-murder special-circumstance finding does not bar Penal Code Section 1170.95 relief.
Criminal Law and Procedure 1DCA/4 Apr. 21, 2021
Whatley v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Prison
Order
USSC Apr. 20, 2021
Brown v. Polk County
Order
USSC Apr. 20, 2021
La Boom Disco Inc. v. Duran
Order
USSC Apr. 20, 2021
PA Higher Education Assistance v. Allan
Order
USSC Apr. 20, 2021
Bognet v. Degraffenreid
Order
USSC Apr. 20, 2021
Hemphill v. New York
Order
USSC Apr. 20, 2021
U.S. v. Do
Invoking the Assimilative Crimes Act while also assimilating Oregon's unlawful use of a weapon is precluded since both statutes punish approximately the same wrongful behavior.
statutory_interpretation 9th Apr. 20, 2021
Seachris v. Brady-Hamilton Stevedore Company
An administrative law judge's determination of attorney's fees must be supported by substantial evidence.
Remedies 9th Apr. 20, 2021
Wilson v. Craver
When general economic principals are alleged in a breach of duty-of-prudence claim, context-specific allegations must be plead.
statutory_interpretation 9th Apr. 20, 2021
In re E.F.
Juvenile Temporary Restraining Orders are properly issued without notice when applicants show a need to avoid great or irreparable injury and comply with applicable procedures.
Juveniles CASC Apr. 20, 2021
People v. Vasquez
Although rape is lesser included offense of aggravated sexual assault by means of rape, it carries longer prison term; thus, defendant's conviction for rape would stand, while the other was vacated.
Criminal Law and Procedure 5DCA Apr. 19, 2021
Salisbury v. City of Santa Monica
Discrimination claims under Fair Housing Amendments Act only apply in cases involving a 'sale' or 'rental' of a dwelling to a buyer or tenant.
Civil Rights 9th Apr. 19, 2021
Poulsen v. Dept. of Defense
Complainant need not show causal connection between Freedom of Information Act lawsuit and government's changed position to show he 'substantially prevailed' for purposes of attorneys' fees.
Remedies 9th Apr. 19, 2021
Marinelarena v. Garland
Order
9th Apr. 19, 2021
Modification: People v. Brugman
Trial court properly refused defense counsel's proffered pinpoint instruction because it was potentially confusing at best, and, at worst, an incorrect statement of the law.
Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/1 Apr. 19, 2021
Modification: Lent v. California Coastal Commission
Coastal Commission did not violate plaintiffs' due process rights by imposing larger penalty than its staff recommended, because Commission specifically advised plaintiffs it could impose penalty of up to $8 million.
Administrative Agencies 2DCA/7 Apr. 19, 2021
Antelope Valley Groundwater Cases
Plaintiff was subject to provisions of trial court's Physical Solution because he had not shown the extent or reasonableness of his claimed beneficial uses of water.
Water Rights 5DCA Apr. 16, 2021
Modification: Sweeney v. San Francisco Bay Conservation
Public Resources Code's permit exceptions were inapplicable to project that went beyond repair and maintenance, and that was inconsistent with local protection plan.
Administrative Agencies 1DCA/3 Apr. 16, 2021
People v. Renteria
Order
CASC Apr. 16, 2021
Amended Opinion: U.S. v. State of Washington
HB 1723 falls within 40 U.S.C. Section 3172's waiver of federal government's immunity from state workers' compensation laws and thus did not violate doctrine of intergovernmental immunity.
Government 9th Apr. 16, 2021
Bafford v. Northrop Grumman
Plaintiffs' state-law professional negligence and negligent misrepresentation claims were not preempted by ERISA since they did not have 'reference to or connection with' ERISA plan.
Constitutional Law 9th Apr. 16, 2021
Adir International v. Starr Indemnity & Liability Company
California Insurance Code Section 533.5(b), which nullifies insurance company's duty to defend, does not facially violate party's due process right to retain counsel.
Insurance 9th Apr. 16, 2021