| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
B293625
|
Betancourt v. OS Restaurant Services, LLC
Plaintiff was not entitled to attorney fees because her claims were based solely on nonprovision of meal or rest periods. |
Remedies |
|
E. Grimes | May 26, 2020 |
|
E073284
|
In re E.E.
Dependency jurisdiction does not require actual neglect; rather there must be a 'substantial risk' that the child will be neglected. |
Dependency |
|
M. Slough | May 26, 2020 |
|
B299607
|
People v. Bonilla-Bray
Under Assembly Bill 865 defendant should have been provided resentencing hearing in which court takes into account mitigating factors related to military service. |
statutory_interpretation |
|
L. Lavin | May 26, 2020 |
|
19-35172
|
U.S. v. Dade
The 9th Circuit decides if the appellant should be released from detention due to the risks of COVID-19. The motion for release on bail pending approval is denied. Berzon dissents. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 26, 2020 | |
|
19-55295
|
Cooper v. Tokyo Electric Power Company
International comity doctrine factors weighed in favor of dismissing lawsuit because Japanese law applied and Japan had a stronger interest. |
International Law |
|
J. Bybee | May 26, 2020 |
|
A155891
|
People v. Smolkin
Appellant's conviction under Penal Code Section 69 based on threatening speech was unconstitutional because his speech was not 'true threat.' |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Simons | May 22, 2020 |
|
S253295
|
Hart v. Keenan Properties, Inc.
Witness observations of names and logos were not hearsay because they were relevant to prove disputed link between defendant and pipes and were not offered for truth of their content. |
Evidence |
|
C. Corrigan | May 22, 2020 |
|
S248125
|
In re Christopher Lee White
Trial court's exercise of discretion in denying bail under California Constitution Article I, Section 12(b) did not constitute abuse of discretion. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Cuéllar | May 22, 2020 |
|
S251706
|
People v. Rodriguez
Prosecutors must generally avoid raising subject of future perjury prosecutions in their closing arguments to avoid improper vouching. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Groban | May 22, 2020 |
|
14-99003
|
Smith v. Baker
Petitioner successfully argued his counsel's performance was deficient but failed to show he was prejudiced by it. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Christen | May 22, 2020 |
|
H044587
|
Modification: Pott v. Lazarin
Civil Code Section 3344.1 prohibits only commercial speech and does not extend to solicitation of funds for advocacy. |
Civil Procedure |
|
N. Mihara | May 22, 2020 |
|
E071361
|
People v. Valles
Courts have discretion to strike greater enhancements only when imposed enhancement was legally inapplicable or unsupported by evidence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Ramirez | May 21, 2020 |
|
E073322
|
Changsha Metro Group Co., Ltd. v. Xuefeng
Proper procedure to follow for plaintiff's attorneys' fees request for opposing anti-SLAPP motion was procedure set forth in Code of Civil Procedure Section 128.5 subdivision (a) and (c). |
Anti-SLAPP |
|
D. Miller | May 21, 2020 |
|
B298750
|
Modification: In re D.B.
Father's violence, verbal abuse, racism, impulsivity, and lack of insight created substantial evidence that daughter faced substantial risk of serious emotional damage. |
Dependency |
|
J. Wiley | May 21, 2020 |
|
A153421
|
Lowery v. Kindren Healthcare Operating, Inc.
Trial court properly excluded expert witness because his declaration provided no explanation as to why he opined that defendant's alleged lack of untimely treatment caused decedent's death. |
Evidence |
|
S. Pollak | May 20, 2020 |
|
D075723
|
Carlsbad Police Officers Assn. v. City of Carlsbad
Trial court abused its discretion in conditioning intervention on interveners striking their request for attorney's fees because they intervened as of right. |
Civil Procedure |
|
W. Dato | May 20, 2020 |
|
A156095
|
Six4Three, LLC v. Facebook, Inc.
No statutory provision, or 'sealing rules' authorizes appeal from order striking documents; thus, portion of court's order striking documents was not appealable. |
Civil Procedure |
|
S. Pollak | May 20, 2020 |
|
H047068
|
Willow Glen Trestle Conservancy v. City of San Jose
City's actions in connection with Streambed Alteration Agreement could not be construed as 'approval of project' requiring further environmental review under CEQA. |
Environmental Law |
|
N. Mihara | May 20, 2020 |
|
19-867
|
Wexford Health v. Garrett
Order |
|
May 19, 2020 | ||
|
19-864
|
Beers v. Barr
Order |
|
May 19, 2020 | ||
|
17-1268
|
Opati v. Republic of Sudan
Plaintiffs in federal causes of action under Section 28 U.S.C. 1605A(c) may seek punitive damages for preenactment conduct because Congress explicitly authorized it. |
statutory_interpretation |
|
N. Gorsuch | May 19, 2020 |
|
B298642
|
People v. Smith
Courts may not defer to jury's pre-'Banks/Clark' factual findings when determining petitioner's eligibility for resentencing under Penal Code Section 1170.95. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
C. Moor | May 19, 2020 |
|
A157038
|
Younan v. Fleming Distribution Company
Defendant waived its right to arbitrate by its repeated choice to forego compelling arbitration in trial court, coupled with its full participation in Labor Commissioner proceedings. |
Arbitration |
|
I. Petrou | May 19, 2020 |
|
19-15566
|
In re NCAA Athletic Grant-in-Aid CAP Antitrust Litigation
NCAA's rules that restricted education-related benefits were unlawful restraints of trade because there was no procompetitive justification and less restrictive alternatives were feasible. |
Antitrust |
|
S. Thomas | May 19, 2020 |
|
B295609
|
Estate of Timothy W. Eimers
Where trust beneficiary creates will giving away his trust shares without specifically referring to power of appointment as required by trust, court may not amend will to include 'specific reference.' |
probate_and_trusts |
|
M. Stratton | May 19, 2020 |
|
19A1034
|
Valentine v. Collier
Inmates in a Texas geriatric prison allege the facility failed to protect them from the dangers of COVID-19. The district court issued an injunction requiring the prison to follow an extensive safety protocol, and the Fifth Circuit stayed that injunction. Application to vacate stay is denied. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 18, 2020 | |
|
B289202
|
Shuler v. Capital Agricultural Property Services, Inc.
Nonsettling tortfeasors were not entitled to contribution from settling tortfeasors but could only be credited amount paid by the settling tortfeasors. |
Remedies |
|
K. Yegan | May 18, 2020 |
|
17-15065
|
In re Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation
When class counsel secures appointment as interim lead counsel by proposing fee structure in competitive bidding process, that bid becomes starting point for determining reasonable fee. |
Attorneys |
|
M. Christen | May 18, 2020 |
|
17-70329
|
Lona v. Barr
Petitioner not entitled to equitable tolling because she untimely failed to act with due diligence in raising errors. |
Immigration |
|
C. Callahan | May 18, 2020 |
|
18-1086
|
Lucky Brand Dungarees, Inc. v. Marcel Fashions Group, Inc.
Claim preclusion generally does not bar claims predicated on events that postdate the filing of the initial complaint. |
Civil Procedure |
|
S. Sotomayor | May 15, 2020 |