For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
People v. Law
Defendant was not entitled to relief under Penal Code Section 1170.95 because he was a major participant and acted with reckless indifference to human life. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/2 May 7, 2020
In re Mary C.
Courts are not required to find children 'generally' adoptable, rather the children must 'likely' be adopted within a reasonable time. 		Dependency 1DCA/4 May 7, 2020
Waller v. FCA US LLC
Plaintiff's expert testimony was not admissible because the testimony failed to establish any basis for his observation. 		Evidence 2DCA/2 May 7, 2020
Center for Biological Diversity v. Esper
NHPA Section 402 compliance does not require agency to consult with specific parties or permit direct public participation. 		Environmental Law 9th May 7, 2020
Hiona v. Superior Court (2154 Taylor LLC)
Under Code of Civil Procedure Section 403.040(e), the superior court was not required to reclassify claims as limited under the circumstances. 		Civil Procedure 1DCA/5 May 7, 2020
Gruber v. Gruber
Plaintiff's malicious prosecution claim did not lack 'minimal merit' because defendants' claim in previous lawsuit lacked probable cause. 		Anti-SLAPP 2DCA/2 May 6, 2020
Patel v. Chavez
Section 1983 does not preempt application of the anti-SLAPP statute to Section 1983 claims in state court. 		Anti-SLAPP 2DCA/1 May 6, 2020
Caldera v. Dept. of Corrections & Rehabilitation
When hiring out-of-town counsel, trial courts must consider counsel's 'home market rate' instead of local rate when determining compensation. 		Remedies 4DCA/3 May 6, 2020
Modification: Communities for a Better Environment v. South Coast Air Quality Management District
Agency's choice of using near-peak baseline was sound because it followed the practice of the federal Environmental Protection Agency. 		Environmental Law 2DCA/8 May 6, 2020
Modification: Coast Community College Dist. v. Commission on State Mandates
Minimum condition regulations imposed requirements on community college districts in connection with underlying programs legally compelled by the state. 		Education 3DCA May 6, 2020
In re D.B.
Father's violence, verbal abuse, racism, impulsivity, and lack of insight created substantial evidence that daughter faced substantial risk of serious emotional damage. 		Dependency 2DCA/8 May 6, 2020
People v. Triplett
Juries should be informed or reminded of their right to readback of testimony upon request to review testimony but such error was harmless here. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 2DCA/1 May 6, 2020
Robertson v. Saadat
Plaintiff was not entitled to use her deceased husband's stored sperm for conception because decedent never expressed an intent to do so. 		Torts 2DCA/1 May 6, 2020
People v. Edwards
Courts may review records of conviction and other information in determining if petitioners meet requirements under Penal Code Section 1170.95. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 1DCA/3 May 6, 2020
In re I.A.
Prosecutors must show dominion and control over a gun to establish a minor was in actual or constructive possession. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 2DCA/6 May 6, 2020
Lopez v. Escamilla
Judgments may be amended to add alter ego defendants either by a subsequent complaint or motion in the original action. 		Civil Procedure 2DCA/6 May 6, 2020
In re S.O.
No joint recommendation report was required under Welfare and Institution code Section 241.1 because the matter was three years into dual status jurisdiction. 		Dependency 4DCA/2 May 6, 2020
People v. Torres
Trial court erred in admitting testimony from preliminary hearing because prosecution failed to establish its due diligence in making the witness available. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 2DCA/8 May 6, 2020
Kinder Morgan Energy v. Upstate Forever
Order 		USSC May 6, 2020
CIC Services LLC v. Internal Revenue Service
Order 		USSC May 6, 2020
Edwards v. Vannoy
Order 		USSC May 6, 2020
Empire Health Foundation v. Azar
Health and Human Services' rulemaking process for its 2005 rule, while not perfect, satisfied APA's notice-and-comment requirements but was substantively invalid. 		statutory_interpretation 9th May 6, 2020
Aguilar Fermin v. Barr
Substantial evidence supported denial of relief and Notice to Appear for removal proceedings need not contain time, date, and location to vest immigration courts with jurisdiction. 		Immigration 9th May 6, 2020
Modification: In re J.H.
Restitution orders imposed in delinquency proceedings are not subject to 10-year enforcement period of Code of Civil Procedure Section 683.020. 		Juveniles 3DCA May 5, 2020
In re A.N.
Fourth truancy report must be issued to attendance supervisor or school superintendent to establish juvenile court jurisdiction. 		statutory_interpretation CASC May 5, 2020
People v. Flores
Jury reasonably concluded defendant committed murder because defendant was with victim, he shot someone near his van, and returned without victim. 		Criminal Law and Procedure CASC May 5, 2020
U.S. v. Yang
No privacy rights exist in rental vehicle's historical location data if company's firm return policy is not adhered to. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 9th May 5, 2020
Romero-Millan v. Barr
Order 		9th May 5, 2020
John Doe #1 v. Trump
Order 		9th May 5, 2020
Amended Opinion: Daniels v. The Walt Disney Co.
Using colors to represent a mood or emotion is an idea that does not fall within the protection of copyright; thus, plaintiff's characters were not protected. 		Copyright 9th May 5, 2020
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.