Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
97-3111
|
Ramirez v. IBP, Inc.
Order |
Employment Law |
|
May 21, 1998 | |
97-3101
|
Sperry Marketing Inc. v. Newco Inc.
Order |
Contracts |
|
May 21, 1998 | |
97-3263
|
Strachan v. City of Huntsville
Order |
Prisoners Rights |
|
May 21, 1998 | |
97-0576
|
Little v. Little
Ex-spouse's pursuit of law degree is change of circumstances warranting modification of child support. |
Family Law |
|
May 21, 1998 | |
97-0328
|
Wiseman v. Dynair Tech of Arizona Inc.
Temporary employee's implied consent to contract of hire limits his remedies to workers' compensation. |
Labor Law |
|
May 21, 1998 | |
97-0250
|
State v. Leyva
$10 million forfeiture violates Eighth Amendment as excessive fine. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 21, 1998 | |
97-0384
|
Sedona Private Property Owners Association v. City of Sedona
City council can repeal local initiative that wasn't passed by a majority of registered voters. |
Government |
|
May 21, 1998 | |
96-0938
|
State v. Bowers
Defendant needn't demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of acquittal to challenge plea on ineffective assistance of counsel basis. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 21, 1998 | |
97SA390
|
O'Neill v. Simpson
Suit contesting court's subject matter jurisdiction in earlier case is barred by res judicata and collateral estoppel. |
Real Property |
|
May 20, 1998 | |
97-3149
|
U.S. v. Atterberry
Trial court's mere mention of right to appeal doesn't nullify appeal waiver in written plea agreement. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 20, 1998 | |
97-5028
|
Lowe v. Town of Fairland
District court's failure to rule on asserted qualified immunity defense is immediately appealable. |
Government |
|
May 20, 1998 | |
95CA1128
|
In the Interest of G.W.R.
Order |
|
May 20, 1998 | ||
97-3125
|
O'Toole v. Olathe District Schools Unified School District No. 233
Kansas special education statutes do not impose greater obligation on the state than federal legislation. |
Education |
|
May 20, 1998 | |
95-2272
|
Roberts v. Kling
Absolute immunity is properly granted to District Attorney investigator for execution of criminal complaint against parent. |
Government |
|
May 20, 1998 | |
97-5175
|
Wilder v. Oklahoma Department of Human Services
Order |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 19, 1998 | |
96SC716
|
Hansen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Trial court isn't required to rewrite inaccurate jury instruction after rejecting it. |
Insurance |
|
May 19, 1998 | |
97SA145
|
Bayer v. Crested Butte Mountain Resort Inc.
Ski lift operators owe passengers the highest duty of care commensurate with practical operation of lifts. |
Torts |
|
May 19, 1998 | |
96SC828
|
People v. Birdsong
Court needn't advise defendant pleading guilty that sex offender treatment requires admission of sexual intent. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 19, 1998 | |
96-9548
|
National Labor Relations Board v. I.W.G. Inc.
Opinion |
|
May 19, 1998 | ||
97-1026
|
Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
Employer demonstrating remedial and preventative actions were reasonably calculated to end harassment avoids liability. |
Employment Law |
|
May 19, 1998 | |
97-1099
|
Bankruptcy of Hamilton Creek Metropolitan District
Municipal district isn't insolvent and doesn't qualify for bankruptcy relief. |
Bankruptcy |
|
May 19, 1998 | |
97-1321
|
U.S. v. Escamilla-Cazares
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 19, 1998 | |
97-2170
|
Bankert v. Shanks
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 19, 1998 | |
97-2173
|
U.S. v. Pearce
U.S. can appeal final order in Section 2255 proceeding and need not obtain certificate of appealability. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 19, 1998 | |
97-3120
|
In re Grand Jury Subpoenas
Limited privilege between corporate officer and attorney creates standing to intervene and move to quash testimony. |
Attorneys |
|
May 19, 1998 | |
97-1025
|
Maher v. Durango Metals Inc.
Investor suing alleged control persons must establish facts showing actual control of primary violator. |
Securities |
|
May 19, 1998 | |
97-2106
|
Aragon v. Shanks
Appeal by probationer challenging constitutionality of good time credits is moot. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
May 19, 1998 | |
97-3139
|
Lowe v. Angelo's Italian Foods Inc.
Order |
Civil Rights |
|
May 19, 1998 | |
97-6004 and 97-6102
|
Okland Oil Co. v. Conoco Inc.
Award of both pre-judgment interest and punitive damages isn't impermissible double penalty. |
Contracts |
|
May 19, 1998 | |
96-3243
|
Cross v. United States of America
Order |
Taxation |
|
May 19, 1998 |