For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
Allen v. U.S.
Order 		USSC Jul. 1, 2019
Mann v. U.S.
Order 		USSC Jul. 1, 2019
Douglas v. U.S.
Order 		USSC Jul. 1, 2019
Ward v. U.S.
Order 		USSC Jul. 1, 2019
Reed v. U.S.
Order 		USSC Jul. 1, 2019
Watkins v. U.S.
Order 		USSC Jul. 1, 2019
Moody v. U.S.
Order 		USSC Jul. 1, 2019
Opati v. Sudan
Order 		USSC Jul. 1, 2019
Thole v. U.S. Bank
Order 		USSC Jul. 1, 2019
Dept. of Homeland v. Regents of University of California
Order 		USSC Jul. 1, 2019
Trump v. NAACP
Order 		USSC Jul. 1, 2019
McAleenan v. Vidal
Order 		USSC Jul. 1, 2019
Babb v. Wilkie
Order 		USSC Jul. 1, 2019
GE Energy Power Conversion v. Outokumpu Stainless
Order 		USSC Jul. 1, 2019
Kelly v. U.S.
Order 		USSC Jul. 1, 2019
Lucky Brand Dungarees Inc. v. Marcel Fashions Group Inc.
Order 		USSC Jul. 1, 2019
Espinoza v. Montana Dept. of Revenue
Order 		USSC Jul. 1, 2019
Romag Fasteners v. Fossil Inc.
Order 		USSC Jul. 1, 2019
Rodriguez v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
Order 		USSC Jul. 1, 2019
Shular v. U.S.
Order 		USSC Jul. 1, 2019
People v. Super. Ct. (Olivo)
Under Section 170.6, a party is permitted to raise peremptory challenges during the refiling of a criminal case and the trial court is required to grant them as timely. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/2 Jul. 1, 2019
Rivera v. Kent
The California Department of Health Care Services is not restricted to 45 days when making Medi-Cal eligibility determinations for applicants under Section 15926 under the Welfare & Institutions Code. 		Health Care 1DCA/4 Jul. 1, 2019
Ponderosa Telephone Co. v. CAPUC
CPUC's decision did not deny petitioners their constitutional rights because the cost of equity it determined for petitioners was not clearly unreasonable. 		Utilities 5DCA Jul. 1, 2019
Blair v. Rent-A-Center
California Supreme Court 'McGill' rule is 'generally applicable contract defense' not preempted by FAA, and invalidates arbitration clause that purports to waive an individual's right to seek public injunctive relief. 		Arbitration 9th Jul. 1, 2019
Rodriguez v. Nike Retail Services
District court erred granting summary judgment for defendant because, under 'Troester v. Starbucks Corp.', the federal de minimis doctrine does not apply to California wage and hour statutes or regulations. 		Employment Law 9th Jul. 1, 2019
Claiborne v. Blauser
Visibly shackling a criminal defendant during a jury trial is a violation of that defendant's civil rights under Section 1983. Remanded for new trial. 		Civil Rights 9th Jul. 1, 2019
People v. Koback
Defendant used car key in a manner capable of causing and likely to result in great bodily injury by lunging and swiping at man's torso with force. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/2 Jul. 1, 2019
Modification: Esparza v. Safeway, Inc.
Appellants failed to submit evidence raising triable issue of material fact regarding whether defendant's challenged conduct harmed class members in manner entitling them to restitution; thus, summary adjudication was proper. 		Labor Law 2DCA/4 Jul. 1, 2019
ValueRock TN Prop. v. PK II Larwin Square
Anti-SLAPP 'arose from' from inquiry requires defendant to show 'speech or petitioning activity itself is the wrong complained of.' 		Anti-SLAPP 4DCA/3 Jul. 1, 2019
Sweetwater Union HS Dist. v. Julian Union Elementary Sch.
Petitioner satisfied Code of Civil Procedure Section 1021.5 criteria justifying the trial court's attorney fee award, and was considered a prevailing party for fee award purposes. 		Civil Procedure 4DCA/1 Jul. 1, 2019
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.