For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
Davis v. United States
Order 		Jul. 2, 2012
Hoitt v. Dept. of Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation Appeals Board does not abuse its discretion by limiting student's tuition reimbursement to rate charged by public institution that would meet student's needs. 		Education Jul. 2, 2012
Kwon v. California
Order 		Jul. 2, 2012
Robinson v. United States
Order 		Jul. 2, 2012
In re Lira
Defendant is not entitled to credit for period of continued incarceration following erroneous denial of parole, but is entitled to credit following Governor’s erroneous veto. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 2, 2012
Ryan K., a Minor
Juvenile court may consider issues beyond those in remittitur where new developments affecting interests of child arise during appeal. 		Juveniles Jul. 2, 2012
Press Democrat v. Sonoma County Herald Recorder
Newspaper is not 'newspaper of general circulation' because it is not printed in place of publication and does not qualify for exemption. 		Government Jul. 2, 2012
Holcomb v. United States
Order 		Jul. 2, 2012
Mercado v. California
Order 		Jul. 2, 2012
Vance v. United States
Order 		Jul. 2, 2012
Moses v. United States
Order 		Jul. 2, 2012
Bagu v. United States
Order 		Jul. 2, 2012
Rickmon v. United States
Order 		Jul. 2, 2012
Moore v. United States
Order 		Jul. 2, 2012
U.S. v. Alvarez
Stolen Valor Act, which prohibited false claims of receipt of military medals, violates First Amendment by regulating speech even where no legal injury is present. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 29, 2012
M.M., a Minor
For purposes of misdemeanor of resisting public officer, school security officers are 'public officers' because their duties are related to law enforcement. 		Juveniles Jun. 29, 2012
United Teachers of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles Unified School District
In dispute over charter school conversion, courts should refuse to compel arbitration of collective bargaining provisions in conflict with Education Code. 		Education Jun. 29, 2012
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's individual mandate, which required individuals to maintain health insurance coverage, is constitutional under Taxing Clause. 		Health Care Jun. 29, 2012
First American Financial v. Edwards
Order 		Jun. 29, 2012
Nian v. Holder
Court has jurisdiction to consider denial of alien crew member’s petition for asylum in asylum-only proceedings because decision was functional equivalent of final order of removal. 		Immigration Jun. 29, 2012
People v. Thomas
Order 		Jun. 29, 2012
Lefort v. S.C. (People)
Order 		Jun. 29, 2012
Rigby v. S.C. (People)
Order 		Jun. 29, 2012
Gordon v. S.C. (People)
Order 		Jun. 29, 2012
Chambers v. S.C. (People)
Order 		Jun. 29, 2012
Smith v. S.C. (People)
Order 		Jun. 29, 2012
Quintero v. S.C. (People)
Order 		Jun. 29, 2012
Yancy v. S.C. (People)
Order 		Jun. 29, 2012
Lunday v. S.C. (People)
Order 		Jun. 29, 2012
W.M. Barr & Co. Inc. v. South Coast Air Quality Management District
Labeling requirement is not preempted by Federal Hazardous Substances Act because hangtag does not constitute directions for use under federal labeling requirements. 		Environmental Law Jun. 29, 2012
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.