For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
NetJets Aviation Inc. v. Guillory
Assessment of personal property tax against managers of fractionally owned aircraft is constitutional, but may not be applied retroactively. 		Taxation Jun. 21, 2012
People v. Tom
Order 		Jun. 21, 2012
People v. Gray
Order 		Jun. 21, 2012
Brinkley v. Public Storage
Order 		Jun. 21, 2012
Bradley v. Networkers International
Order 		Jun. 21, 2012
Faulkinbury v. Boyd & Associates
Order 		Jun. 21, 2012
Brookler v. Radioshack Corporation
Order 		Jun. 21, 2012
Hernandez v. Chipotle Mexican Grill
Order 		Jun. 21, 2012
Tien v. Tenet HealthCare
Order 		Jun. 21, 2012
United Parcel Ssrvice Wage & Hour Cases
Order 		Jun. 21, 2012
Lamps Plus Overtime Cases
Order 		Jun. 21, 2012
Santos v. Vitas HealthCare
Order 		Jun. 21, 2012
United Parcel Service Wage and Hour Cases
Order 		Jun. 21, 2012
Zelasko-Barrett v. Brayton-Purcell
Order 		Jun. 21, 2012
Aleman v. Airtouch Cellular
Order 		Jun. 21, 2012
Muldrow v. Surrex Solutions
Order 		Jun. 21, 2012
Direct Shopping Network LLC v. James
Collateral estoppel bars plaintiff from relitigating anti-SLAPP motion where court found that first motion was unsupported and allowed new evidence on second. 		Civil Procedure Jun. 21, 2012
Cadlerock Joint Venture L.P. v. Lobel
Holder of junior lien that is extinguished during nonjudicial foreclosure may sue debtor for amount owed where lienholders have different interests. 		Real Property Jun. 21, 2012
Southern Union Co. v. U. S.
Maximum punishment authorized for particular crime must be proved to jury beyond reasonable doubt where criminal fine is substantial enough to trigger Sixth Amendment’s jury-trial guarantee. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 21, 2012
Knox v. Service Employees International Union Local 1000
Public-sector union violates First Amendment rights by requiring nonunion employees to pay into fund created for political purpose without providing fresh notice. 		Labor Law Jun. 21, 2012
Dorsey v. U.S.
Fair Sentencing Act’s new, lower mandatory minimum prison terms apply to post-Act sentencing of pre-Act crack cocaine offenders. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 21, 2012
FCC v. Fox Television Stations
FCC fails to give broadcasters fair notice that fleeting expletives and momentary nudity may be found actionably indecent. 		Constitutional Law Jun. 21, 2012
Manriquez (Abelino) on H.C.
Order 		Jun. 21, 2012
Krusan (Sara J.) on H.C.
Order 		Jun. 21, 2012
Kurwa v. Kislinger
Order 		Jun. 21, 2012
People v. S.C. (Valle)
Order 		Jun. 21, 2012
People v. Correa
By its plain language, Penal Code Section 654 does not bar multiple punishment for multiple violations of same criminal statute. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 21, 2012
People v. Jones
Defendant may not be punished separately for being felon in possession of firearm, carrying concealed firearm, and carrying loaded firearm based on single act. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 21, 2012
Parks v. MBNA America Bank N.A.
California banking statute is preempted by federal law when it impairs national bank's authority by requring specific disclosure language on convenience checks. 		Banking Jun. 21, 2012
U.S. v. Mak
Defendant who conspired to violate export control laws is properly convicted under Arms Export Control Act, which is not unconstitutionally vague because it is content neutral. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 21, 2012
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.