This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

New Rules of Professional Conduct


Oct. 30, 2018

Professional Responsibility

Commentaries from California attorneys on the first major overhaul of the California Rules of Professional Conduct, set to take effect Nov. 1, 2018.


In This Issue:

Rule 1.0.1

Terminology

Rule 1.0

Purpose and Function of the Rules of Professional Conduct

Rule 1.10

Imputation of Conflicts of Interest: General Rule

Rule 1.11

Special Conflicts of Interest for Former and Current Government Officials and Employees

Rule 1.1

Competence

Rule 1.12

Former Judge, Arbitrator, Mediator Or Other Third-Party Neutral

Rule 1.13

Organization as Client

Rule 1.14

[Reserved] (Rule 1.14 has not been adopted in California.)

Rule 1.15

Safekeeping Funds and Property of Clients and Other Persons

Rule 1.16

Declining Or Terminating Representation

Rule 1.17

Sale of a Law Practice

Rule 1.18

Duties To Prospective Client

Rule 1.2.1

Assisting, Soliciting, or Inducing Violations (Rule Approved by the Supreme Court Pending the State Bar's Submission of Additional Revisions)

Rule 1.2

Scope of Representation and Allocation of Authority

Rule 1.3

Diligence

Rule 1.4.1

Communication of Settlement Offers

Rule 1.4

Communication with Clients

Rule 1.4.2

Disclosure of Professional Liability Insurance

Rule 1.5.1

Fee Divisions Among Lawyers

Rule 1.5

Fees for Legal Services

Rule 1.6

Confidential Information of a Client

Rule 1.7

Conflict of Interest: Current Clients

Rule 1.8.10

Sexual Relations With Current Client

Rule 1.8.11

Imputation of Prohibitions Under Rules 1.8.1 to 1.8.9

Rule 1.8.1

Business Transactions with a Client and Pecuniary Interests Adverse to a Client

Rule 1.8.2

Use of Current Client's Information

Rule 1.8.3

Gifts From Client

Rule 1.8.4

[Reserved] (Rule 1.8.4 has not been adopted in California.)

Rule 1.8.5

Payment of Personal or Business Expenses Incurred by or for a Client

Rule 1.8.6

Compensation from One Other Than Client

Rule 1.8.7

Aggregate Settlements

Rule 1.8.8

Limiting Liability to Client

Rule 1.8.9

Purchasing Property at a Foreclosure or a Sale Subject to Judicial Review

Rule 1.9

Duties to Former Clients

Rule 2.1

Advisor

Rule 2.2

[Deleted] (Rule 2.2 has not been adopted in California. The ABA rejected and deleted the rule in 2002.)

Rule 2.3

[Reserved] (Rule 2.3 has not been adopted in California.)

Rule 2.4.1

Lawyer as Temporary Judge, Referee, or Court-Appointed Arbitrator

Rule 2.4

Lawyer as Third-Party Neutral

Rule 3.10

Threatening Criminal, Administrative, or Disciplinary Charges

Rule 3.1

Meritorious Claims and Contentions

Rule 3.2

Delay of Litigation

Rule 3.3

Candor Toward the Tribunal*

Rule 3.4

Fairness to Opposing Party and Counsel

Rule 3.5

Contact With Judges, Officials, Employees, and Jurors

Rule 3.6

Trial Publicity

Rule 3.7

Lawyer as Witness

Rule 3.8

Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor

Rule 3.9

Advocate in Nonadjudicative Proceedings

Rule 4.1

Truthfulness in Statements to Others

Rule 4.2

Communication With a Represented Person*

Rule 4.3

Communicating with an Unrepresented Person*

Rule 4.4

Duties Concerning Inadvertently Transmitted Writings*

Rule 5.1

Responsibilities of Managerial and Supervisory Lawyers

Rule 5.2

Responsibilities of a Subordinate Lawyer

Rule 5.3.1

Employment of Disbarred, Suspended, Resigned, or Involuntarily Inactive Lawyer

Rule 5.3

Responsibilities Regarding Nonlawyer Assistants

Rules 5.4

Financial and Similar Arrangements with Nonlawyers

Rule 5.5

Unauthorized Practice of Law; Multijurisdictional Practice of Law

Rule 5.6

Restrictions on a Lawyer's Right to Practice

Rule 5.7

[Reserved] (Rule 5.7 has not been adopted in California.)

Rule 6.1

[Reserved] (Rule 6.1 has not been adopted in California.)

Rule 6.2

[Reserved] (Rule 6.2 has not been adopted in California.)

Rule 6.3

Membership In Legal Services Organization

Rule 6.4

[Reserved] (Rule 6.4 has not been adopted in California.)

Rule 6.5

Limited Legal Services Programs

Rule 7.1

Communications Concerning a Lawyer's Services

Rule 7.2

Advertising

Rule 7.3

Solicitation of Clients

Rule 7.4

Communication of Fields of Practice and Specialization

Rule 7.5

Firm* Names and Trade Names

Rule 8.1.1

Compliance with Conditions of Discipline and Agreements in Lieu of Discipline

Rule 8.1

False Statement Regarding Application for Admission to Practice Law

Rule 8.2

Judicial Officials

Rule 8.3

[Reserved] (Rule 8.3 has not been adopted in California.)

Rule 8.4.1

Prohibited Discrimination, Harassment and Retaliation

Rule 8.4

Misconduct

Rule 8.5

Disciplinary Authority; Choice of Law

Ethics/Professional Responsibility, Law Practice

ANALYSIS: Rule 1.18

California's new Rules of Professional Conduct, effective Nov. 1, will implement a new ethical rule imposing duties of confidentiality and fidelity on attorneys who obtain confidential information from prospective clients.
MCLE
Oct. 17, 2018

Ethics/Professional Responsibility, Law Practice

ANALYSIS: Rule 1.7

The new rules changes the rules governing conflicts involving current representations. But don't be alarmed.
MCLE
Oct. 17, 2018

Ethics/Professional Responsibility, Law Practice

ANALYSIS: Rules 5.1, 5.2 & 5.3

The new Rules of Professional Conduct include, for the first time in California, disciplinary rules specifically addressing the duties of lawyers who manage or supervise other lawyers or legal staff as well as the duties of subordinate lawyers.
MCLE
Oct. 17, 2018

Ethics/Professional Responsibility, Law Practice

ANALYSIS: Rule 1.8.5

Where the state once took a more restrictive view of the payment of client expenses under the auspices of an attorney-client relationship, beginning Nov. 1, California lawyers will be expressly permitted to pay certain costs on behalf of their indigent clients.
MCLE
Oct. 17, 2018

Ethics/Professional Responsibility, Law Practice

ANALYSIS: Rule 1.15

This might be the new rule of conduct that has the most impact on how California lawyers practice, especially solo and small firm lawyers.
MCLE
Oct. 17, 2018

Ethics/Professional Responsibility, Law Practice

The new conduct rules: a snapshot

On May 10, the California Supreme Court issued an order approving a new set of Rules of Professional Conduct, the first comprehensive overhaul of California's ethics rules since 1989.
MCLE
Oct. 17, 2018

Ethics/Professional Responsibility, Law Practice

ANALYSIS: Rule 4.4

Under the new rules, duty is just a click away: A new rule of conduct establishes an affirmative duty on the recipient to act and further the protection of privilege.

Ethics/Professional Responsibility, Law Practice

ANALYSIS: Rule 1.5

The new rules continue to remind us that there are limitations on the amount and ways we can charge our clients.

Ethics/Professional Responsibility, Law Practice

ANALYSIS: Rule 5.4

Lawyers should have professional relationships that minimize the risk that nonlawyers will interfere with their independent judgment.
MCLE
Oct. 17, 2018

Ethics/Professional Responsibility, Law Practice

ANALYSIS: Rules 3.3, 4.1

The current state bar rule of professional conduct dealing with dishonest lawyers imposes a duty of candor that is by its own terminology, is limited to the courtroom. That will change Nov. 1.

Ethics/Professional Responsibility, Law Practice

ANALYSIS: Rule 8.4

Beginning Nov. 1, California lawyers will have an entirely new definition of misconduct.

Ethics/Professional Responsibility, Law Practice

ANALYSIS: Rule 1.3

Prior to the Supreme Court’s adoption of this new rule, the duty of diligence was a component of current Rule 3-110, Failing to Act Competently.

Ethics/Professional Responsibility, Law Practice

ANALYSIS: Rule 1.9 (substantial relationship test)

New Rule 1.9 provides that a lawyer may not represent a person materially adverse to a former client, without the former client's consent, "in the same or a substantially related matter," regardless of whether the lawyer actually obtained confidential information.

Ethics/Professional Responsibility, Law Practice

ANALYSIS: Rule 8.5

The new Rules of Professional Conduct will result in a significant change regarding when California will apply its own rules of professional conduct as opposed to the rules of another jurisdiction.

Ethics/Professional Responsibility, Law Practice

ANALYSIS: Rule 1.9 (use of confidential information)

An interesting aspect of the new rule is the discussion of a lawyer's use of confidential information related to representation of a former client.

Ethics/Professional Responsibility, Law Practice

ANALYSIS: Rule 1.13

While the current rule did not undergo a complete overhaul, the intent of the drafters is clear: encourage transparency and reporting amongst legal professionals and their organizational clients.

Ethics/Professional Responsibility, Law Practice

Mind the more mundane ethical rules, too

With the new Rules of Professional Conduct set to take effect Nov. 1, it is a good moment to consider the impact of more mundane ethical violations. A recent case provides an example.

Ethics/Professional Responsibility, Law Practice

The disruptive and controversial new rules

Part one of a three-part series on the new ethics rules.
MCLE
Oct. 17, 2018

Ethics/Professional Responsibility, Law Practice

The uncontroversial, but important new rules

Part two of a three-part series on the new ethics rules.
MCLE
Oct. 17, 2018

Ethics/Professional Responsibility, Law Practice

The entirely new rules

Part three of a three-part series on the new ethics rules.
MCLE
Oct. 17, 2018

Ethics/Professional Responsibility, Law Practice

16 things to know about California’s new Rules of Professional Conduct

Run through some quick facts about the new ethics rules.