This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Disability Discrimination
Retaliation

Maria C. Martinez v. Rite Aid, Kien Chu

Published: Nov. 6, 2010 | Result Date: Oct. 5, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC401746 Verdict –  $8,200,000

Court

L.A. Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

James Urbanic
(Urbanic & Associates)

Carney R. Shegerian
(Shegerian & Associates Inc.)


Defendant

Thomas K. Hockel
(Klein, Hockel, Iezza & Patel PC)

Annmarie M. Liermann

Jonathan Allan Klein
(Klein, Hockel, Iezza & Patel PC)


Experts

Plaintiff

Craig Snyder
(medical)

Facts

In 1983, plaintiff Maria Martinez began working for a Thrifty Drug store, which became a Rite-Aid in 1998. In 2003, Martinez took a series of disability leaves of absence, after she began having symptoms of a psychiatric illness.

Martinez's employment was terminated in 2007. Martinez filed suit against Rite-Aid, alleging disability discrimination and retaliation.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Martinez alleged after she returned from leave, her supervisors constantly reprimanded and harassed her, calling her a "basket case." She further contended that, after being moved from one of Rite Aid's stores in Pasadena to Arcadia, her boss falsely accused her of giving medication to a customer, calling her "bipolar" and "crazy." Martinez stated that her supervisor, Kien Chau, and other employees rebuffed her claim that a manager had touched her inappropriately outside of work in 2006. She contended that Rite Aid failed to take sufficient action against the manager when she filed a complaint against him.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Rite-Aid alleged that Martinez had a poor work history, including arguing with supervisors. Rite-Aid contended that Martinez was issued a written warning in 2005 for counseling a customer about using medication, in violation of the law, which limits such a task to pharmacists. Rite-Aid claimed Martinez was terminated for poor work performance and attitude issues.

Damages

Martinez sought damages for discrimination, retaliation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Result

The jury rendered a verdict in favor of Martinez, finding defendants liable for disability, medical leave and sexual harassment retaliation in violation of public policy and invasion of privacy, awarding her $3,400,000 in compensatory damages and $4,800,000 in punitive damages. The jury also found Chau individually liable for intentional infliction of emotional distress, awarding Martinez an additional $50,000.

Other Information

FILING DATE: November 2008.

Deliberation

1.5 days (liability phase); 2.5 hours (damages phase)

Length

22 days


#100058

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390