This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Retaliation
Wrongful Termination

Robin Love v. The Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan

Published: Jan. 25, 2014 | Result Date: Dec. 19, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:12-cv-05679-WHO Bench Decision –  Dismissal in part

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Briana Cummings

Jenny Chi-Chin Huang


Defendant

Tanya Cecena

David C. Anderson
(Anderson Law)

David M. Rosenberg-Wohl
(Hershenson Rosenberg-Wohl APC)

Mark A. Palley


Facts

Robin Love worked as a licensed clinical social worker for a Kaiser Permanente facility in South San Francisco. In February 2011, one of Love's patients told another therapist that he wanted to murder Love. Love requested that her employer obtain a restraining order on her behalf to protect her, however none was obtained. Love complained regarding Kaiser's failure to provide a safe environment.

The following year, Love was placed on administrative leave, and then fired. Love then filed grievances against her employer's disciplinary actions and when her grievances were denied she filed suit.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Love contended that after she complained of Kaiser's refusal to obtain a restraining order, her supervisor, Kenneth Shigematsu, initiated disciplinary proceedings against her for her alleged poor clinical care of her patients. Love argued that she was fired in retaliation for her complaints about workplace safety issues. She asserted causes of action for retaliation, discrimination, wrongful termination, breach of contract wrongful termination of hospital privileges, intentional infliction of emotional distress, violation of right to fair procedure, and injunctive relief.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendants moved to dismiss, arguing that Love had not alleged sufficient facts to support her claims.

Result

The court granted defendants' motion to dismiss with regards to Love's first and fourth causes of action, those for retaliation and breach of contract. Plaintiff's remaining five claims are set to go to trial in November.


#100229

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390