This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Breach of Fiduciary Duty
ERISA
Employee Stock Ownership Plan

Kronzer v. Hintz

Published: Sep. 17, 2011 | Result Date: May 10, 2011 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:10-cv-01270-BZ Bench Decision –  Defense

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Thomas Easton


Defendant

Tad A. Devlin
(Kaufman, Dolowich & Voluck LLP)


Facts

Plaintiff, a participant in an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP), requested financial information after the sale for $4,475,350 of the company in 2007 regarding the purchase agreement and bank statements of a $500,000 escrow account in 2008. Defendant CEO and trustee of the ESOP refused to disclose. Plaintiff filed complaints with the Dept. of Labor. After no response, he filed a lawsuit for fiduciary abuse and for an accounting to determine whether the allocation of only 57.37% of the proceeds to the ESOP was proper.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff filed a motion for partial summary judgment for fiduciary abuse and an accounting. Defendant in response disclosed the purchase agreement and the bank statements, some 648 days after the initial request. Plaintiff requested statutory damages of $110 a day for failure to disclose and for attorney fees and costs.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant alleged that a feud by his former father-in-law was behind plaintiff cousin's lawsuit, and filed his own motion for summary judgment.

Result

The Court denied plaintiff's partial summary judgment on the ground that defendant alleged good faith and plaintiff failed to prove bad faith, but ordered the disclosure of the documents. The Court further denied attorney fees and costs as discretionary under ERISA. The Court granted defendant's summary judgment and final judgment with costs against plaintiff. Post-judgment, defendant filed his motion for attorney fees in the amount of $158,454.30 and costs of $16,813.30. The Court denied both attorney fees and costs on the grounds of defendant's refusal to disclose and that plaintiff had been accorded relief.


#100698

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390