This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
Due Process Violation
Anti-Gang Injunction

Manuel Vasquez, et al. v. Tony Rackauckas, et al.

Published: Jun. 11, 2011 | Result Date: May 10, 2011 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 8:09-cv-1090 Bench Decision –  Injunctive Relief

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Sarala Nagala

Peter Bibring
(ACLU Foundation of Southern California)

Jacob S. Kreilkamp
(Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP)

Belinda E. Helzer

Joseph J. Ybarra
(Halpern May Ybarra Gelberg LLP)

Laura D. Smolowe
(Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP)


Defendant

S. Frank Harrell
(Lynberg & Watkins)

Wayne W. Winthers


Facts

A class action was filed against Orange County District Attorney Tony Rackauckas and the Orange Police Dept. alleging civil rights violations for illegally placing residents under a gang injunction. Residents of Orange County complained that they were pulled into the dragnet of gang injunctions without any findings of fact to determine whether they were actually gang participants. Rackauckas sued for injunctions against alleged members of an Orange street gang, who were later dismissed before they had a chance to dispute the allegations that they were members of any gang. After the Orange County Superior Court entered judgment by default against the gang, Rackaukas served the injunction obtained by default on the same individuals he had earlier dismissed from the case.

Result

U.S. District Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank held that Rackauckas and the Dept. deprived plaintiffs "of their constitutionally protected liberty interests without adequate procedural protections" in enforcing anti-gang injunctions against plaintiffs, and enjoined them from enforcing the gang injunction against plaintiffs.


#100764

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390