Robert S. Rad, Elena Rad, Iran Moosiki Inc. v. Trifish LLC, Hooshang Namvar
Published: Jul. 16, 2011 | Result Date: Sep. 8, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: BC413602 Verdict – Defense
Court
L.A. Superior Central
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Daniel E. Park
(Daniel E Park Law Corporation)
Defendant
Richard H. Lee
(Salisian Lee LLP)
Facts
On Jan. 9, 2006, Robert and Elena Rad, and Iran Moosiki Inc., agreed to lend Trifish LLC $1,000,000. Trifish then executed a promissory note through Hooshang Namvar, payable to the Rads and Iran Moosiki, for $1 million plus interest. Namvar verbally personally guaranteed the loan.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The Rads and Iran Moosiki alleged that when the note was due, Namvar and Trifish defaulted.
DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Namvar and Trifish alleged that Trifish was lent a total of $4 million, and after paying back $3 million, the parties executed a new note for the remaining balance. They further contended that they paid $1 million to Namco Capital Group Inc., which then assumed the promissory note through an assignment expressly consented to by the Rads and Iran Moosiki. Namvar and Trifish stated that the plaintiffs accepted interest payments from Namco from Nov. 2007 until the company filed bankruptcy in 2008.
Result
The jury rendered a verdict for the defense.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390