This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Environmental Law
Water Contamination
Negligent Disposal of Waste

Castaic Lake Water Agency, Newhall County Water District, Santa Clarita Water Co., Valencia Water Co. v. Whittaker Corp., Santa Clarita LLC, Remediation Financial Inc., Does 1-10 Inclusive

Published: Aug. 4, 2007 | Result Date: May 1, 2007 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:00-cv-12613-AHM-RZ Settlement –  $100,000,000 (estimated)

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Byron P. Gee

Melissa A. Poole

Thomas D. Long
(Judge)

Alfred E. Smith

Frederic A. Fudacz
(Nossaman LLP)


Defendant

Thomas F. Vandenburg
(Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman LLP)

William E. Halle

Joseph J. Armao

Richard A. Dongell

Matthew C. Bures

Lawrence J. Hilton

Michael E. Gallagher Jr.
(Edlin Gallagher Huie Blum LLP)


Experts

Plaintiff

David K. Todd
(technical)

Phyllis Stanin
(technical)

John A. Balistreri
(technical)

Jeffrey Zelikson
(technical)

Defendant

Randall Bell
(technical)

Randy E. Marx
(technical)

Thomas A. Delfino
(technical)

Jeffrey B. Hicks
(technical)

Thomas N. Sheahan
(technical)

Facts

In 1967, defendant Whittaker Corp. began operating a 996-acre munitions plant in Santa Clarita. The plant manufactured and stored rockets, sidewinder missiles, dynamite and explosives. The defendant shut down the plant approximately 20 years later.

In 1997, perchlorate was found in a number of wells in Santa Clarita Valley. Plaintiffs Castaic Lake Water Agency, Newhall County Water District, Valencia Water Co. and Santa Clarita Water Co. filed suit against defendant and others, alleging environmental damages. They also claimed violations of the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act and the state Hazardous Substance Account Act, in addition to negligence, negligence per se, trespass and nuisance. According to plaintiffs, defendants polluted the area with perchlorate, which was contaminating the Santa Clarita Valley water supply.

In 2003, the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment as to liability was granted. The parties also reached an interim settlement whereby defendants spent $9.5 million to create a remediation plan. Defendants also filed a counterclaim, for which they recovered $325,000.

Damages

The plaintiffs sought reimbursement damages, including $9.5 million already spent, to cover cleanup and maintenance costs.

Result

The parties reached a settlement whereby plaintiffs would conduct the cleanup, and the funding provided by defendants would be used to build replacement wells, pipeline and a treatment plant to remove perchlorate and to cover ongoing operations and maintenance expenses of the project for up to 30 years. Under the settlement terms, plaintiffs were also required to seek grants to help pay for monitoring, treatment and other costs not covered by the settlement.


#101257

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390