This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury (Non-Vehicular)
Medical Malpractice
No Consent

Krystina Wisniowska v. Richard Kornberg, M.D.

Published: Mar. 22, 1997 | Result Date: Feb. 10, 1997 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 694868 –  $0

Judge

Robert C. Baxley

Court

San Diego Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Dean B. Jacobsen


Defendant

Michael I. Neil
(Neil, Dymott, Frank, McCabe & Hudson)


Experts

Plaintiff

Abel Torres
(medical)

Constance Nagy
(medical)

Defendant

Don E. Miller
(technical)

Paul M. Goldfarb
(medical)

Dominick Addario
(medical)

Joseph College
(medical)

Facts

On Aug. 17, 1995, plaintiff Krystina Wisniowska, a 47-year old woman on disability, presented to defendant Dr. Kornberg with a tumor on her right upper lip which had been present for at least two years. On Sept. 5, 1995, Dr. Kornberg did an incisional biopsy. The plaintiff claimed that the surgery was performed without her consent, and she thought she was going to have a simple biopsy to diagnose her condition. Thereafter, the plaintiff presented on three follow-up visits and on the second follow-up complained that she did not consent to the incisional biospy, that she expected only a small biopsy, and that she was unhappy about the disfiguring scar. The pathology report indicated the margins were not clear, so the plaintiff was scheduled for reconstructive surgery with a plastic surgeon on Dec. 8, 1995, but walked out of the surgical suite. The plaintiff claimed that the doctor was unable to communicate well enough to assure her that he would be able to remove all the cancer which remained after the surgery. She subsequently had a MOHS procedure performed by another doctor in February 1996 and reconstructive plastic surgery at the University of California at San Diego Medical Center the following day. The plaintiff had two subsequent plastic surgery revisions and a third is scheduled. The plaintiff brought this action against the defendant doctor based on medical negligence, medical malpractice, battery, fraud and intentional infliction of emotional distress theories of recovery.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff made a C.C.P. º998 settlement demand for $249,000. The defendant made no settlement offers.

Specials in Evidence

$3,000 (balance paid by insurance) $7,500

Injuries

The plaintiff alleged she sustained a disfiguring scar on her upper lip, temporarily impairing her speech and ability to find employment. The plaintiff also claimed emotional distress due to her disfigurement.

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately one year and two months after the case was filed.

Deliberation

1+ hours

Poll

not taken

Length

6 days


#101368

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390