This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Breach of Contract
Breach of Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing

Michael Neumann, Katherine Neumann v. Allstate Insurance Company, and Does 1 through 100, inclusive

Published: Mar. 1, 2014 | Result Date: Jan. 23, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:12-cv-10714-SJO-SH Summary Judgment –  Defense

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Eric B. Seuthe


Defendant

Peter H. Klee
(Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP)

Suzanne Y. Badawi
(Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP)


Facts

Michael and Katherine Neumann sued Allstate Insurance Co. in connection with a motor vehicle accident.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Allstate issued an automobile insurance policy for the Neumanns' 2010 Bentley Speed Convertible. On March 5, 2012, the couple was involved in an automobile accident, causing plaintiffs injury and damage to the car. The Neumanns were also injured as a result thereof. The Neumanns notified Allstate of the damage to their car, and sought payment what they claimed was a total loss of their vehicle pursuant to the insurance policy. However, the Neumanns contended that Allstate failed to, and refused to, select an appraiser pursuant to the insurance policy. In turn, this precluded the Neumanns from resolving their insurance claim. As such, the Neumanns sued Allstate for breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Allstate contended that its adjuster estimated the cost of repairs to be over $80,000. On the other hand, the Neumanns's mechanic estimated the repairs at over $150,000. Allstate contended that the Neumanns' estimate contained duplicate charges. Nevertheless, Allstate issued several checks to the Neumanns for the repair of their vehicle totaling $95,048. Meanwhile, the Neumanns maintained that their car was a total loss and demanded an appraisal. However, Allstate contended that the Naumans refused to engage in the appraisal process.

Eventually, the court had to appoint an umpire to appraise the amount of loss because Allstate and the Neumanns could not agree on an appraiser. In the end, Allstate issued a final check for $117,518, which represented the umpire's award minus the Neumanns' deductible. Then, Allstate filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that the matter had been resolved.

Result

The court ultimately granted Allstate's motion for summary judgment.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Sept. 24, 2012.


#101800

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390