This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
FLSA
Wage and Hour

Ahmed Higazi, on behalf of himself and a class of those similarly situated v. Cadence Design Systems Inc.

Published: Sep. 20, 2008 | Result Date: Jul. 7, 2008 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: C-07-2813-JW Settlement –  $7,664,860

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

James M. Finberg
(Altshuler Berzon LLP)

Jahan C. Sagafi
(Outten & Golden LLP)

Peter E. Leckman

Kelly M. Dermody
(Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein LLP)


Defendant

Molly A. Harcos

Jeffrey D. Wohl
(Paul, Hastings LLP)

M. Kirby C. Wilcox


Facts

Ahmed Higazi was the lead plaintiff of 207 technical support workers. The class members were employed by Cadence Design Systems Inc. in the United States between May 2003 and July 2008. The majority of the class members worked in California.

The plaintiffs sued under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the California Labor Code.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiffs contended that they were not paid overtime and that they were misclassified as exempt from laws governing overtime pay.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant countered that the employees were properly classified as exempt employees in adherence to federal and state law.

Damages

The plaintiffs sought an unspecified amount in compensation for overtime work performed. The defendant alleged that the overtime hours claimed was in excess of hours actually worked.

Result

The plaintiffs settled for $7,664,856.61, which was distributed to the class members based on the number of weeks worked and whether the employee worked in California. Due to California's greater remedies for workers, plaintiffs who had worked in California would be entitled to more compensation. Slightly less than twenty-five percent of the recovery went toward attorney fees and costs.


#101932

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390