This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Consumer Protection
Fraud

Federal Trade Commission v. In Deep Services Inc., a California corporation, also dba Grants For You Now, Grant One Day, and Easy Grant Access, Ryan Champion, individually and as an officer of In Deep Services Inc., and Joseph C. Fleming IV, individually and as an officer of In Deep Services Inc.

Published: Dec. 24, 2010 | Result Date: Oct. 26, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 5:09-cv-01193-DEW-PJWx Settlement –  $9,000,000

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

David C. Fix

Ruth Yodaiken

Barbara Y.K. Chun
(Federal Trade Commission)


Defendant

Theodore F. Monroe
(Law Offices of Theodore F. Monroe)

William Rothbard


Facts

In Deep Services Inc., doing business as Grant$ For You Now, operated a website asking for consumers' credit or debit account information to process a $1.99 fee for government grant information to pay personal expenses or debt, and debited bank accounts without approval.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The Federal Trade Commission alleged that In Deep Services deceptively advertised free government grants despite the fact that the federal government does not provide such grants for personal expenses or debt payment. The FTC further contended that the business failed to disclose to consumers that they would be charged monthly and falsely offered 100 percent no hassle money back guarantee.

Damages

The FTC initially sought consumer redress equal to the entire amount of the company's sales.

Result

The parties reached a settlement for $9 million. The $9 million settlement is suspended as long as defendants have not misrepresented their financial condition. Instead, they owe approximately $500,000, but this amount is also not due to the FTC as long as the funds are used to pay defendants' current and back taxes. Defendants are allowed to continue to market products over the Internet.

Other Information

FILING DATE: June 23, 2009.


#102318

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390