Christopher J. Anthony v. Cellco Partnership dba Verizon, Wireless
Published: Dec. 24, 2010 | Result Date: Aug. 27, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 2:09-cv-01024-GEB-KJM Summary Judgment – Defense
Court
USDC Eastern
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Defendant
Catherine S. Nasser
(Jones Day)
Aaron L. Agenbroad
(Jones Day)
Facts
Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless employed Christopher Anthony as an operations manager. He went to a company dinner on Dec. 14, 2007, before which he had consumed two beers, and drank a martini and a beer at the dinner. Anthony threw food that had been in his mouth at others, made inappropriate noises and remarks, improperly touched his female supervisor, fell off of a chair, and urinated on a supervisor while in the parking lot. Anthony did not remember the events of the evening.
In a Dec. 17 email to his coworkers, Anthony apologized for his behavior at the dinner and said that he was at a loss for why he acted that way and that he went to Kaiser over the weekend. Anthony subsequently made four doctor visits and requested Family Medical Leave on Jan. 9.
Anthony was sent home on Jan. 10 and on Jan. 15, Verizon officially terminated Anthony's employment stating that his behavior had violated Verizon's code of conduct.
Anthony later sued Verizon for disability discrimination in violation of California Government Code Section 12940(a), failure to reasonably accommodate, retaliation, violation of the California Family Rights Act, and wrongful termination.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff argued that defendant wrongfully terminated his employment due to his disability, and retaliated against him after he filed a claim under the California Family Rights Act.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant argued that he was not drunk, but rather suffering from anxiety, depression, and possibly bipolar disorder, which manifested itself that evening after three and a half drinks. Defendant contended that plaintiff was fired because he engaged in inappropriate conduct at a company party. Further, defendant argued that plaintiff could not prove disability, failure to accommodate, or that his termination was based on disability.
Result
The court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390